cs.ROAug 13, 2026

Manufacturing Complex Airtight Soft Pneumatic Actuators for Soft Robotics: Process Evaluation and Optimization

Authors: Mohammed Abboodi

Abstract

Manufacturing complex soft pneumatic actuators remains challenging because geometric fidelity, compliance, structural integrity, and airtightness must be achieved simultaneously. This study presents a manufacturing-focused evaluation of several fabrication routes for complex pneumatic structures, including heat-shrink forming, silicone casting, powder- and liquid-based additive manufacturing, and fused deposition modeling (FDM). The processes were assessed through process screening, baseline fabrication, failure analysis, and process improvement to distinguish inherent process limitations from correctable manufacturing defects. Heat-shrink forming was limited by geometric conformity, casting by mold accessibility and bonded interfaces, powder-based methods by residual material trapped within enclosed passages, and digital light processing by the material properties and post-processing requirements of the investigated system. FDM provided the most adaptable route because its dominant defects could be progressively reduced through process optimization. The results further showed that airtightness depends not only on nominal wall thickness but also on extrusion-path architecture, while support-free geometry is important when access for internal post-processing is limited. These findings establish a practical design-for-manufacturing approach in which process selection is guided by the compatibility between actuator architecture and manufacturing constraints. The proposed approach provides practical guidance for developing complex, flexible, and airtight soft pneumatic actuators for soft robotic applications

Explore similar work

May 24, 2026cs.RO

Soft Pneumatic Actuators for Soft Robotics: A Motion-Based Review of Actuation Mechanisms and Performance Trade-offs

Soft pneumatic actuators are widely used in soft robotics because they can produce large motions while remaining compliant enough to interact safely with objects, environments, and the human body. However, their performance is not solely determined by pressure. Instead, the response depends on the way the actuator is built, including the shape of its chambers, the placement of reinforcements, the use of folds, material stiffness, and the constraints that guide its deformation. As the literature has expanded, it has become more difficult to determine which mechanism is most suitable for a given application and which reported results can be compared across studies. This review examines soft pneumatic actuators according to the design strategies used to generate four motion classes: linear, bending, twisting, and omnidirectional actuation. For each class, it analyzes the structural features that define the deformation path, including braid angle, fold geometry, fiber orientation, chamber arrangement, structural asymmetry, and internal constraint layers. It then discusses how the design choice affect motion output, force generation, air demand, repeatability, durability, fabrication difficulty, and robotic integration. The review further identifies key conditions that must be considered when selecting or comparing actuators, including pressure, loading condition, actuator size, pneumatic supply, and hysteresis This approach helps explain why actuators with similar motion outputs may differ substantially in design requirements, pneumatic demand, and practical suitability. It also highlights the design priorities needed for compact, efficient, repeatable, and deployable soft pneumatic systems in wearable, biomedical, and mobile robotic applications.
Mohammed Abboodi
May 19, 2026cs.RO

Topology-Optimized Pneumatic Soft Actuator: Design and Experimental Validation

This paper demonstrates the computational design of soft elastomeric pneumatic actuators using nonlinear topology optimization. An existing density- and porohyperelasticity-based topology optimization framework was extended from 2D to 3D and used to generate two manufacturable actuator designs, which were then studied numerically and experimentally. For both designs, the objective was to maximize the bending response for a prescribed actuation pressure under two different allowable strain limits. A key advantage of the employed topology optimization framework is that it can consistently, during the optimization, account for the very large deformations induced upon pressurization. The two optimized 3D designs were fabricated using stereolithography and experimentally tested to validate their performance.
Sumit Mehta, Konstantinos Poulios
Nov 24, 2025cs.RO

Soft Pneumatic Grippers: Topology optimization, 3D-printing and Experimental validation

Typically, heuristic/trial-based approaches are used to design soft pneumatic grippers (SPGs). This paper presents a systematic topology optimization framework for developing SPGs. The design-dependent nature of actuating load is modeled using Darcy's law with an added drainage term. A 2D soft arm unit is then optimized as a compliant mechanism under pneumatic loading. To ensure the design is robust and manufacturable, the problem is formulated as a min-max optimization, where output deformations of blueprint and eroded designs are considered. A volume constraint is imposed on the blueprint part, while a strain-energy constraint is enforced on the eroded part. The Method of Moving Asymptotes is employed to solve optimization problems. The optimized 2D part is extruded suitably to generate a 3D unit. Ten such 3D units are assembled to create a gripper arm. Both the optimized 2D unit and the corresponding gripper arm outperform their conventional rectangular designs under pneumatic loading, demonstrating the efficacy of the proposed approach. The arms are fabricated using the SLA printing technique. Numerical and experimental results are compared at different pneumatic loads. Four 3D-printed arms are integrated with a supporting structure to form the SPG. The gripping action of the SPG is demonstrated on objects with different weights, sizes, structures, stiffnesses, and shapes.
Prabhat Kumar, Chandra Prakash, Josh Pinskier +2