LLM-Guided Graph Generation for Structure-Based Local Improvement Methods

Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle to solve complex combinatorial problems through direct reasoning, so recent neuro-symbolic systems increasingly use them to synthesize executable solvers. A central design question is how the LLM should represent the solver, and whether it should also attempt to optimize search. We introduce CP-SynC-XL, a benchmark of 100 combinatorial problems (4,577 instances), and evaluate three solver-construction paradigms: native algorithmic search (Python), constraint modeling through a Python solver API (Python + OR-Tools), and declarative constraint modeling (MiniZinc + OR-Tools). We find a consistent representational divergence: Python + OR-Tools attains the highest correctness across LLMs, while MiniZinc + OR-Tools has lower absolute coverage despite using the same OR-Tools back-end. Native Python is the most likely to return a schema-valid solution that fails verification, whereas solver-backed paths preserve higher conditional fidelity. On the heuristic axis, prompting for search optimization yields only small median speed-ups (1.03-1.12x) and a strongly bimodal effect: many instances slow down, and correctness drops sharply on a long tail of problems. A paired code-level audit traces these regressions to a recurring heuristic trap. Under an efficiency-oriented prompt, the LLM may replace complete search with local approximations (Python), inject unverified bounds (Python + OR-Tools), or add redundant declarative machinery that overwhelms or over-constrains the model (MiniZinc + OR-Tools). These findings support a conservative design principle for LLM-generated combinatorial solvers: use the LLM primarily to formalize variables, constraints, and objectives for verified solvers, and separately check any LLM-authored search optimization before use.

Automating optimization modeling from natural language with large language models (LLMs) faces two key challenges. First, training corpora lack structural diversity. Second, data generation pipelines remain static and decoupled from model learning. To address these challenges, we propose EvoOptiGraph, a novel framework where data and model co-evolve, driven by model weaknesses. EvoOptiGraph represents each mixed-integer linear program (MILP) as an attributed bipartite graph and applies validity-preserving evolutionary operators to generate structurally diverse instances. The evolved graphs are converted into solver code and natural language via deterministic compilation and verified back-translation. Training proceeds in two stages: supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on an initial dataset, followed by reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), where graph-derived weakness signals guide the generation of new instances targeting the model's failures. This forms a closed loop that continuously updates the training distribution. Empirical results on six public datasets show that EvoOptiGraph significantly outperforms larger generalist models, agentic methods, and specialized baselines in accuracy, executability, and generalization. These results demonstrate that targeted data-model coevolution is an effective strategy for improving LLMs on optimization modeling tasks.

Combinatorial optimization (CO) underlies decision-making from logistics to chip design, where infeasible solutions are operationally unusable and small quality gains translate into substantial economic value. Recent work uses large language models (LLMs) to automate solver synthesis: generating executable solver programs from natural-language specifications. However, existing tree-search and evolutionary agents refine candidate trajectories in parallel without explicit knowledge transfer, reintroducing the same constraint violations and converging on similar algorithm families. We introduce MEMOIR, a memory-guided tree-search framework with a two-level memory hierarchy: branch-local memory preserves execution-grounded refinement details within a branch as it iterates on a single algorithmic design, while global memory stores compressed algorithmic and failure-mode summaries across branches. A reflection step at branch termination distills these summaries, enabling cross-branch transfer without polluting future contexts with low-level debugging traces. Across seven CO problems spanning scheduling, routing, packing, and geometric design, MEMOIR achieves 96.7% solution validity (a 9.2 point gap over the strongest baseline) and improves the average normalized score by 7.3 points at matched per-method execution budget. Over three independent runs on four problems, MEMOIR's run-to-run validity standard deviation is more than an order of magnitude below that of every baseline we evaluated in this setting, suggesting that memory-guided exploration yields consistent improvements rather than reflecting sampling variance.