Beyond Natural-Image Foundation Models: Benchmarking Satellite Pretraining for Ophthalmic Image Analysis
Authors: Lovre Antonio Budimir, Mingya Alexa Gong, Alyssa Foong Quinney, Ivana Matovinović, Yukun Zhou, Pearse A. Keane, Sven Lončarić, Marinko V. Šarunić
Organizations: Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, HR · Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, UK · Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, UK · Department of Computer Science, University College London, UK · NIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK · Hawkes Institute, University College London, UK · Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
Vision Foundation Models (VFMs) have emerged as a promising approach in medical imaging, producing broadly applicable systems that can be efficiently adapted across diverse imaging modalities, anatomical regions, and clinical tasks. However, VFMs require extensive training data, and their progress in medical image analysis is constrained by limited data availability, privacy concerns, and high development costs. To alleviate these constraints, medical VFMs (MedVFMs) are often built upon weights from generalist models pretrained on vast amounts of publicly available natural images, introducing a substantial distribution shift for medical task adaptation. To address this, we propose satellite imagery as a novel pretraining domain for MedVFM development and benchmarking, motivated by its closer visual alignment with medical data and its freedom from the privacy constraints that limit medical datasets. Across multiple ophthalmic imaging modalities, we compare DINOv3-SAT493m pretrained on 493 million satellite images against DINOv3-LVD1689m pretrained on 1.7 billion natural images, together with two medical specialist baselines: DINOv3-RETFound and MAE-RETFound. Our experiments show that satellite imagery is a stronger pretraining source than natural images for ophthalmic tasks, particularly on en face vascular-rich modalities. On several tasks, satellite pretraining matches or exceeds the medical specialists on high-resolution en face inputs, despite using no medical data.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Motivation. Satellite image of the Lena River Delta in Russia (left; source: NASA, public domain) and an OCT angiography image (right; OCTA-500 dataset [ 16 ] ). Zoomed-in regions in the middle highlight the structural similarities between branching river networks and retinal vascular patterns observed in OCTA.
Figure 2: Visualization of dense features extracted from DINOv3-LVD1689m (middle) and DINOv3-SAT493m (bottom) across five ophthalmic imaging modalities: OCTA, UWF, CFP, OCT, and AOSLO. The first three principal components of a PCA computed over the feature space are mapped to RGB for visualization.
Figure 3: Cosine similarity scores computed between the dense feature at the red query patch and all other patch features for DINOv3-LVD1689m and DINOv3-SAT493m. DINOv3-SAT493m results in more consistent similarity scores along OCTA vessels (top) and UWF hemorrhagic regions (bottom), better matching the corresponding ground truth masks.
Dataset
Modality
Task
# Images
Resolution
Segmentation
OCTA-500 (3M) [ 16 ]
OCTA
Large Vessels, Artery, Vein, FAZ
200
304×304
OCTA-500 (6M) [ 16 ]
OCTA
Large Vessels, Artery, Vein, FAZ
300
400×400
IDRiD [ 25 ]
CFP
4 lesion types, optic disc
81
4288×2848
FIVES [ 14 ]
CFP
Vessels
800
2048×2048
UWF-RHS [ 33 ]
UWF
Hemorrhages
215
3900×3072
Table 1: Overview of retinal imaging datasets used in the benchmark setup.
OCTA-500 (3M) [ 16 ]
OCTA-500 (6M) [ 16 ]
OCTA
Vessel
Artery
Vein
FAZ
Vessel
Artery
Vein
FAZ
DINOv3-LVD1689m [ 27 ]
68.2
58.3
54.7
94.7
61.6
47.8
51.8
86.1
DINOv3-SAT493m [ 27 ]
71.8
62.7
60.4
94.1
64.4
52.1
55.3
87.9
Table 2: Quantitative comparison on OCTA segmentation task using OCTA-500 [ 16 ] dataset. Results are reported as Dice scores (%). The best result is shown in bold.
IDRiD [ 25 ]
FIVES [ 14 ]
CFP
HE
MA
EX
SE
OD
Overall
Vessel
MAE-RETFound [ 34 ]
32.4
10.2
41.9
37.0
94.5
43.2
57.0
DINOv3-RETFound [ 35 ]
32.6
8.7
40.4
36.0
94.2
42.4
54.6
DINOv3-LVD1689m [ 27 ]
38.1
8.4
40.4
46.9
94.7
45.7
60.6
DINOv3-SAT493m [ 27 ]
37.0
13.2
41.9
54.5
93.5
48.0
60.5
Table 3: Quantitative comparison on CFP segmentation task. Left: performance on five segmentation tasks from the IDRiD dataset [ 25 ] , covering diabetic retinopathy lesions and retinal structures: hemorrhages (HE), microaneurysms (MA), hard exudates (EX), soft exudates (SE), and optic disc (OD). Right: performance on retinal vessel segmentation from the FIVES dataset [ 14 ] . Results are reported as Dice scores (%). The best result is shown in bold and the second-best result is underlined.
UWF-RHS [ 33 ]
PRIME-FP20 [ 6 ]
UWF
Hemorrhages
Vessel
DINOv3-LVD1689m [ 27 ]
37.3
46.4
DINOv3-SAT493m [ 27 ]
42.5
47.9
Table 4: Quantitative comparison on UWF segmentation task. Left: performance on retinal hemorrhage segmentation from the UWF-RHS dataset [ 33 ] . Right: performance on retinal vessel segmentation from the PRIME-FP20 dataset [ 6 ] . Results are reported as Dice scores (%) and the best is shown in bold.
OCT
HCMS [ 11 ]
AMD-SD [ 12 ]
Retinal Layer
Lesions
RNFL
GCL+IPL
INL
OPL
ONL
IS
OS
RPE
SRF
IRF
PED
SHRM
IS/OS
DINOv3-LVD1689m [ 27 ]
85.3
85.7
64.4
72.3
88.3
71.5
74.6
83.3
37.6
28.1
28.9
32.7
46.7
DINOv3-SAT493m [ 27 ]
87.6
88.8
71.2
77.2
90.4
77.2
80.3
86.0
40.3
24.7
28.2
32.5
48.9
Table 5: Quantitative comparison on OCT HCMS [ 11 ] retinal layer segmentation and AMD-SD [ 12 ] lesion segmentation tasks. Results are reported as Dice scores (%). The best is shown in bold.
AOSLO
Capillaries
DINOv3-LVD1689m [ 27 ]
56.1
DINOv3-SAT493m [ 27 ]
60.2
Table 6: Quantitative comparison on AOSLO capillary segmentation task. Results are reported as Dice scores (%) and the best is shown in bold.
Figure 4: Dice score (DS) over training epochs for vasculature segmentation (vessels and capillaries) across four en face modalities: OCTA, CFP, UWF, and AOSLO.
CFP
UWF
OCT
Method
Acc
QWK
wF1
Acc
QWK
wF1
Acc
QWK
wF1
MAE-RETFound [ 34 ]
75.3
85.0
81.0
–
–
–
88.9
84.7
88.8
DINOv3-RETFound [ 35 ]
74.3
82.5
73.7
–
–
–
–
–
–
DINOv3-LVD1689m [ 27 ]
78.0
88.4
78.7
66.9
87.8
66.8
86.2
84.2
86.5
DINOv3-SAT493m [ 27 ]
80.6
89.5
81.0
70.0
89.0
69.5
83.9
81.8
85.0
Table 7: Classification performance across retinal imaging modalities on MMRDR [ 29 ] dataset. Results are reported as accuracy (Acc), quadratic weighted kappa (QWK), and weighted F1 score (wF1). Best results are highlighted in bold.
Figure 5: Qualitative results on segmentation tasks across four different modalities.
Figure 6: Visualization of dense CFP features extracted from DINOv3-LVD1689m, DINOv3-SAT493m , and DINOv3-RETFound. The first three principal components of a PCA computed over the feature space are mapped to RGB for visualization. Input image size to the DINOv3 model is 1024×1024 .
General vision foundation models (VFMs) have been primarily developed on natural images, and their utility for medical image segmentation is therefore often considered to depend on costly adaptation or domain-specific fine-tuning. In this paper, we revisit this assumption from a different perspective: rather than requiring VFM segmentors to relearn visual regularities, we investigate whether the low-level visual priors necessary for anatomical delineation already lie dormant within general VFMs. We observe that frozen VFMs, despite lacking medical supervision, encode transferable visual regularities. These properties are not exclusive to natural images but are also fundamental to medical image understanding. Motivated by this observation, we propose Latent Universal Medical PriOrs for Segmentation (LUMOS), a novel framework that amplifies general VFM priors to conventional medical segmentors. LUMOS consists of two key components: (1) Pathfinder that distills visual cues from a frozen vision foundation model, and (2) Inspiror that sparks the conventional medical networks with spatial guidance from distilled visual regularities. In this way, the segmentor is relieved from learning complex visual regularities entirely from limited medical annotations and can instead focus on task-specific anatomical delineation. Across diverse medical datasets and token-based VFMs, LUMOS shows that general VFMs can serve as spatial prior generators when their frozen token spaces preserve patch-level pattern relevance. DINO provides stable matched-backbone gains, while SigLIP exposes VFM-specific sensitivity caused by its different token granularity and representation objective.
Zhuonan Liang, Wei Guo, Jie Gan +4
The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. · Biological System & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. · Berkeley Biomedical Data Science Center, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Despite the widespread adoption of foundation models as feature extractors for medical imaging, relatively little is understood about how different pretraining strategies influence the transferability of learned representations to weakly supervised ophthalmic imaging tasks. We investigate this question in ultra-widefield (UWF) retinal imaging by evaluating foundation model representations within a patch-based multiple instance learning (MIL) framework for disease classification on UWF images. We compare Vision Transformer encoders pretrained with supervised, Masked Autoencoder (MAE), and self-distillation objectives, while keeping the downstream aggregation architecture unchanged. Within a controlled comparison of ViT-B encoders pretrained on ImageNet-1k, the choice of pretraining objective substantially influenced frozen representation transfer, with supervised and self-distillation-based models outperforming MAE. A contemporary DINOv3 model pretrained at a larger scale achieved the strongest overall performance, with a quadratic weighted kappa of 0.863 for five-class diabetic retinopathy grading, comparable with DINOv1. Attention analysis further revealed distinct patch-aggregation behaviours associated with the different pretrained representations, while partial fine-tuning substantially reduced the performance gap for MAE. These findings suggest that pretraining strategy influences both representation transferability and the subsequent aggregation of patch-level evidence within MIL, resulting in differences in downstream classification performance.
Mingya Alexa Gong, Da Ma, Lovre Antonio Budimir +7
Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom · Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA · Virginia Tech-Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Blacksburg, VA, USA +5
Artificial intelligence (AI) shows remarkable potential in medical imaging diagnostics, yet most current models require retraining when applied across different clinical settings, limiting their scalability. We developed GlobeReady, a deployment-oriented platform powered by the RetiGlobe foun- dation model and local feature augmentation. RetiGlobe was pretrained in two stages: 1) self-supervised learning using DINOv2 on 38 million synthetic ophthalmic images, and 2) contrastive learning using CLIP on 475,845 real image-text pairs spanning diverse ethnicities, imaging devices, and geographic regions worldwide. We evaluate GlobeReady on 488,448 ophthalmic images, including color fundus photographs (CFPs) and optical coherence tomography scans, from multi-centres in China, Singapore, Vietnam and the UK. Prospective testing included usability assessment with 31 ophthalmologists. Exploratory analyses evaluated domain generalisability, Bayesian uncertainty quantification, out-of-distribution (OOD) detection, and feature-based case retrieval.