Learning reshapes power-law anisotropy in internal representations

Biological neural networks are noisy: their dynamics involve difficult-to-predict fluctuations which are likely due not just to chaos, but also to a variety of low-level biophysical processes. Despite the omnipresence of intrinsic noise, its theoretical consequences are incompletely understood, especially in the context of learning. For example, does noise meaningfully shape representation learning, or is it better viewed as a nuisance factor whose presence or absence changes little about what solution is found and when? Here, we argue that intrinsic noise can significantly modulate representation learning in recurrent neural networks (RNNs), since it can strongly break solution-space degeneracies and in some cases control whether a non-degenerate solution exists at all. We show that this is true for an analytically tractable model of noisy RNN learning with a linear activation function and white noise inputs. We find that, in the so-called rich regime (where weights are initialized with small values), noise strongly modulates the directions in which the read-in, readout, and recurrent weights align. Moreover, we find that noise produces a kind of phase transition: for sufficiently high noise, a non-degenerate solution is not even optimal if parameter scales are limited (e.g., via regularization). These results extend recent analytic work on RNN representation learning and show that noise can act as a fundamental determinant of representations.

Power-law learning curves are often treated as fixed properties of a model and its data, although learning-rate and batch-size schedules can change the observed loss. We study this dependence in noisy online SGD with linear random features. Conditional on the representation, an exact Volterra equation separates two response components: a forcing term that propagates unresolved target error and a memory kernel that propagates stochastic-error injections. We prove that either component follows a power law if and only if its cumulative weighted spectral mass has the corresponding low-spectrum scaling; individual eigenvalues and target coefficients need not obey coordinatewise power laws. Under a joint schedule, intrinsic time $T_t=\sum_{s<t}η_s$ controls optimization progress, while $r_t=B_t/η_t$ controls noise injection. Their interaction yields sharp conditions under which a schedule preserves, changes, or destroys the clean power law, together with a memory ceiling on noise reduction. The power-law random-feature model realizes this mechanism in $3+3(+2)$ propagation regimes with phase-dependent compute rates. Controlled nanoGPT experiments show that (1) learning-rate and batch-size schedules with matched $B/η$ paths are nearly equivalent in intrinsic time, (2) a forcing-memory surrogate accurately predicts loss across schedules, and (3) its fitted exponents across real-world datasets identify the regime of LLMs in $3+3(+2)$ map. The source code for reproducing our experiments is available on https://github.com/yichenblue/spectra-to-schedules-in-pretraining.

Representation learning from complex data typically involves models with a large number of parameters, which in turn require large amounts of data samples. In neural network models, model complexity grows with the number of inputs to each neuron, with a trade-off between model expressivity and learning time. A precise characterization of this trade-off would help explain the connectivity and learning times observed in artificial and biological networks. We present a theoretical analysis of how learning time depends on input dimensionality for a Hebbian learning model performing independent component analysis. Based on the geometry of high-dimensional spaces, we show that the learning dynamics reduce to a unidimensional problem, with learning times dependent only on initial conditions. For higher input dimensions, initial parameters have smaller learning gradients and larger learning times. We find that learning times have supralinear scaling, becoming quickly prohibitive for high input dimensions. These results reveal a fundamental limitation for learning in high dimensions and help elucidate how the optimal design of neural networks depends on data complexity. Our approach outlines a new framework for analyzing learning dynamics and model complexity in neural network models.