FloodReasonBench: Benchmarking VLM Reasoning Segmentation for Embodied Flood Response at the Edge

Existing vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in reasoning-based segmentation. However, current benchmarks are primarily constructed from high-quality images captured under idealized conditions. This raises a critical question: when visual cues are severely degraded by adverse weather conditions such as rain, snow, or fog, can VLMs sustain reliable reasoning segmentation capabilities? In response to this challenge, we introduce WeatherReasonSeg, a benchmark designed to evaluate VLM performance in reasoning-based segmentation under adverse weather conditions. It consists of two complementary components. First, we construct a controllable reasoning dataset by applying synthetic weather with varying severity levels to existing segmentation datasets, enabling fine-grained robustness analysis. Second, to capture real-world complexity, we curate a real-world adverse-weather reasoning segmentation dataset with semantically consistent queries generated via mask-guided LLM prompting. We further broaden the evaluation scope across five reasoning dimensions, including functionality, application scenarios, structural attributes, interactions, and requirement matching. Extensive experiments across diverse VLMs reveal two key findings: (1) VLM performance degrades monotonically with increasing weather severity, and (2) different weather types induce distinct vulnerability patterns. We hope WeatherReasonSeg will serve as a foundation for advancing robust, weather-aware reasoning.

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

Geospatial foundation models can provide strong flood-segmentation performance, but their size limits deployment on memory-constrained edge hardware. We distill a 300-million-parameter Prithvi-EO-2.0 teacher, fine-tuned on the 252 manually labeled Sen1Floods11 training scenes, into a 0.7-million-parameter EfficientViT-B0 student. The teacher supervises additional unlabeled Sentinel-2 imagery, allowing the student training set to grow without new manual annotations. At the matched budget of 252 scenes, teacher-supervised training is competitive with direct training and improves STURM-Flood performance across tested configurations; a geometry-matched control shows that label source alone does not explain the difference. Scaling the teacher-supervised pool to 2,500 scenes narrows the remaining student--teacher gap: the float student reaches 0.787 water intersection over union on the Sen1Floods11 test split against 0.822 for the teacher, matches the teacher on STURM-Flood under our evaluation protocol, and remains below it on WorldFloods-v2. After activation replacement and quantization-aware training, the student runs as a 1.5-megabyte 8-bit integer (INT8) TensorRT engine on a Jetson Xavier NX at 5.57 milliseconds of graphics processing unit (GPU) compute per 512-by-512 image, with approximately 14 megabytes of runtime device memory. A fixed modified normalized difference water index (MNDWI) threshold is competitive with both models on the two clean external benchmarks, so we interpret those benchmarks as generalization tests rather than as evidence of learned-model superiority over a spectral rule. The results support the conclusion: foundation-model supervision can amplify a fixed manual annotation budget into a substantially larger training set and yield a compact, deployable edge model.