GAINS: Leveraging Inconsistent Human Intervention Signals in Reinforcement Learning

Online reinforcement learning (RL) enables robot policies to improve through physical interaction, but the assistance they require changes as their competence evolves. Existing intervention strategies based on offline estimates or fixed decision rules can therefore become mismatched to the current policy. To address this, we propose UniIntervene++, an adaptive intervention agent that learns to allocate control between autonomous execution and heterogeneous assisted behaviors during online RL. Specifically, UniIntervene++ first formulates the evolving RL policy, trajectory correction, and a task-structured CodePolicy as Options in a unified semi-Markov decision process and learns their relative values online. Building on this, competence-adaptive intervention periodically probes the RL policy through unassisted execution, keeping control allocation responsive to its evolving capability. Finally, coupled experience learning allows assisted behaviors to improve the RL policy, whose evolving outcomes in turn reshape future intervention decisions. In this way, UniIntervene++ jointly determines when to intervene, how to intervene, and when to return control as the RL policy improves. Across five real-world manipulation tasks, UniIntervene++ achieves an average success rate of 89.67%, outperforming all baselines by at least 6 percentage points, while reducing human intervention to 0.77%, a relative reduction of at least 94.6% from the best baseline. Code is available in our GitHub repository.

Human-in-the-loop reinforcement learning (HiL-RL) has emerged as an effective paradigm for real-world robotic manipulation, enabling online policy improvement with human guidance. However, current HiL-RL frameworks remain intervention-intensive, relying on frequent human corrections to redirect the policy out of unproductive exploration, which incurs high labor cost and limits real-world scalability. To address this, we propose UniIntervene, an agentic intervention model that detects unproductive exploration and autonomously recovers the policy toward high-value states, taking over the bulk of interventions from human operators. Specifically, UniIntervene first performs future-conditioned action-value estimation, predicting the latent consequence of the current action and evaluating its induced value, which provides a more stable progress signal. Building on this, a temporal value-risk critic aggregates recent value dynamics and triggers intervention when the estimated value exhibits sustained stagnation or degradation. When intervention is required, UniIntervene retrieves a high-value recovery target from a memory of past intervention episodes and produces executable corrective actions through a goal-conditioned recovery policy. In this way, UniIntervene turns intervention from passive human correction into a value-aware recovery process for efficient real-world RL. Extensive experiments on diverse real-world manipulation tasks demonstrate that UniIntervene improves the average success rate by 8.6% while reducing human interventions by 57% relative to state-of-the-art HiL-RL baselines.

While reinforcement learning (RL) enables robots to acquire skills autonomously, its real-world deployment is severely limited by inefficient and unsafe exploration. Human-in-the-loop interventions offer a practical solution, yet existing methods typically exploit these interventions as auxiliary training signals, without fully capturing the richer information they provide about when and how autonomy should be guided. Human interventions often encode relative preferences over behavior under safety and task constraints, rather than prescribing exact actions to imitate. Motivated by this perspective, we propose Online Human Preference as Guidance in Reinforcement Learning (OHP-RL), a framework that leverages human interventions as preference information to guide policy learning. OHP-RL introduces a state-dependent preference gate that adaptively regulates when and to what extent human interventions should shape policy learning. This design enables the agent to benefit from intermittent and imperfect human feedback while preserving autonomous exploration and stable policy optimization. We evaluate OHP-RL on three challenging real-world contact-rich manipulation tasks on a Franka robot. Across all tasks, OHP-RL consistently achieves strong success rates, faster convergence, and substantially lower human intervention effort than prior approaches. Moreover, the learned policies exhibit more stable and human-aligned behavior throughout training.