Existing image editing frameworks predominantly follow the training paradigm of text-to-image diffusion models. However, extending this paradigm to image editing highlights two inherent discrepancies, specifically, the insufficient attention to edit concept granularity and the training inefficiency caused by sparse supervision signals. To address these issues, we establish a comprehensive hierarchical taxonomy featuring over 1,000 fine-grained edit concepts and build ConceptEdit-12M, a massive dataset of 12 million high-quality editing pairs via an improved synthesis framework. This library-driven approach effectively rectifies the distribution collapse of generated data while ensuring high data fidelity. Furthermore, we propose a dense supervision training strategy that synthesizes multiple non-interfering concepts into single image pairs. By providing richer learning signals, this strategy significantly enhances both training efficiency and overall model performance. Training results validate our strategy, significantly outperforming prior works. Finally, we present ConceptEdit-Bench, a granular evaluation suite designed to diagnose model capabilities across a vast array of real-world scenarios.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: (a) Edit Concept Scaling. Left: The previous paradigm is restricted by coarse categories and limited diversity. Right: Our approach scales up to 1,000+ fine-grained concepts to ensure a balanced and rich distribution. (b) Dense Supervision. Left: Conventional training relies on single edit pairs with sparse supervision signals. Right: Our composite edit strategy provides dense supervision, enhancing training efficiency.
Figure 2: Hierarchical taxonomy of 1,000+ fine-grained edit concepts. Top: Overall hierarchical framework. Mid: Specific leaf nodes for detailed edit concepts. Bottom: Visualizations of edit samples.
Figure 3: Overview of the improved synthesis framework. Stage 1: Library Construction leveraging LLM world knowledge. Stage 2: Semantic Matching and Instruction Generation including VQA checklists. Stage 3: Image Synthesis using various editing models. Stage 4: Instance Specific Verification using VQA.
Table 1: Quantitative comparison and ablation study on the ImgEdit benchmark [ Ye et al., 2025b ] . The models are trained on 2M and 5M data scales respectively. Abbreviations: Ext.: Extract, Rm.: Remove, Bg.: Background, Adj.: Adjust, Rep.: Replace, Act.: Action, Comp.: Compose. Δ Comp. Gain indicates the improvement brought by dense supervision (w/ Comp) over ConceptEdit 1000 . Δ Overall Gain highlights the total performance margin of our full framework over previous best-performing baseline (ScaleEdit). Best results per category at each scale are in bold.
Figure 5: Training efficiency for different strategies.
Scale
Method
GEdit-Bench-EN
GEdit-Bench-CN
GSC↑
GPQ↑
GO↑
GSC↑
GPQ↑
GO↑
2M
UnicEdit
4.87
7.03
4.79
4.83
7.00
4.65
ScaleEdit
5.30
6.79
5.38
5.33
6.66
5.25
ConceptEdit 10
5.34
6.76
5.41
5.54
7.03
5.15
ConceptEdit 500
5.90
7.13
5.54
5.51
6.70
5.45
ConceptEdit 1000
5.91
6.76
5.48
5.87
7.00
5.48
Table 2: Quantitative comparison and ablation study on GEdit-Bench [ Liu et al., 2025 ] . The models are evaluated at 2M and 5M training data scales. Δ Comp. Gain indicates the improvement brought by dense supervision (w/ Comp) over the baseline ConceptEdit 1000 . Δ Overall Gain highlights the performance margin of our full framework over the previous best baseline (ScaleEdit). Best results per metric at each scale are in bold.
Filtering Strategy
Precision
Recall
F1-Score
Accuracy
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
Pseudo GT (Gemini)
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Generic Validation
75.0
57.0
65.0
90.0
Instance-Specific (Ours)
84.0
87.0
86.0
95.0
Δ Gain
↑ 9.0
↑ 30.0
↑ 21.0
↑ 5.0
Table 3: Ablation study of our VQA filtering pipeline.
Appendix figures & tables5 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Figure 6: Visualizations of generalized image-to-image translation under various structural control signals.
Metric
Ground Truth
Generic
Ours
Δ Gain
TN
833
802
805
–
FN
0
72
21
–
TP
167
95
146
–
FP
0
31
28
–
Precision (%)
100.0
75.0
84.0
↑ 9.0
Recall (%)
100.0
57.0
87.0
↑ 30.0
Appendix
Table 4: Detailed ablation of our VQA filtering pipeline, including raw confusion matrix counts.
Stage
Generic
Ours
Overhead
Instruction Generation
0.523s
0.567s
+0.044s
Filtering Stage
0.312s
0.337s
+0.025s
Total
0.835s
0.904s
+0.069s
Appendix
Table 5: Per-sample processing latency (seconds) benchmarked on Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.
Dataset
Sub- tasks
Size
Post Verification
Basic Edit
Complex Edit
Dist. Control
Failed Filtration
Inst.-Spec. Filtering
Recaption
MagicBrush [ Zhang et al., 2023 ]
5
∼ 10K
✔
✘
✘
✔
✘
✘
InstructPix2Pix [ Brooks et al., 2023 ]
4
∼ 313K
✘
✘
✘
✔
✘
✘
HQ-Edit [ Hui et al., 2024 ]
6
∼ 197K
✘
✘
✔
✔
✘
✘
SEED-Data-Edit [ Ge et al., 2024 ]
6
∼ 3.7M
✔
✘
✘
✔
✘
✘
UltraEdit [ Zhao et al., 2024 ]
9
∼ 4M
✘
✘
✘
✔
✘
✘
Appendix
Table 6: Comparison of Image Editing datasets.
Model
Advanced
Object
Compo.
Global
Portrait
Text
Overall
Open-source Models
BAGEL-7B-MoT [ Deng et al., 2025 ]
42.21
46.12
38.85
44.90
41.10
33.91
41.66
FLUX.1-Kontext-dev [ Labs et al., 2025 ]
50.73
42.88
44.45
49.05
37.36
40.15
43.53
LongCat-Image-Edit [ Team et al., 2025a ]
64.06
61.46
57.51
65.39
51.68
62.08
59.05
Qwen-Image-Edit-2509 [ Wu et al., 2025 ]
67.36
63.83
58.37
64.59
54.27
69.85
61.27
Qwen-Image-Edit-2511 [ Wu et al., 2025 ]
66.78
68.45
60.38
70.39
53.75
73.50
63.29
Appendix
Table 7: Quantitative comparison on ConceptEdit-Bench. The “Overall” column represents the final aggregated performance across our 1,000 fine-grained categories.
Instruction-based image editing has emerged as a key capability for unified multimodal models (UMMs), yet constructing large-scale, diverse, and high-quality editing datasets without costly proprietary APIs remains challenging. Previous image editing datasets either rely on closed-source models for annotation, which prevents cost-effective scaling, or employ fixed synthetic editing pipelines, which suffer from limited quality and generalizability. To address these challenges, we propose ScaleEditor, a fully open-source hierarchical multi-agent framework for end-to-end construction of large-scale, high-quality image editing datasets. Our pipeline consists of three key components: source image expansion with world-knowledge infusion, adaptive multi-agent editing instruction-image synthesis, and a task-aware data quality verification mechanism. Using ScaleEditor, we curate ScaleEdit-12M, the largest open-source image editing dataset to date, spanning 23 task families across diverse real and synthetic domains. Fine-tuning UniWorld-V1 and Bagel on ScaleEdit yields consistent gains, improving performance by up to 10.4% on ImgEdit and 35.1% on GEdit for general editing benchmarks and by up to 150.0% on RISE and 26.5% on KRIS-Bench for knowledge-infused benchmarks. These results demonstrate that open-source, agentic pipelines can approach commercial-grade data quality while retaining cost-effectiveness and scalability. Both the framework and dataset will be open-sourced.
Guanzhou Chen, Erfei Cui, Changyao Tian +6
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · Shanghai AI Laboratory · CUHK MMLab +3
Training-free image editing with diffusion models is highly desirable yet is complex and remains a significant challenge. While recent optimisation-based methods achieve strong zero-shot edits from text, they still struggle to preserve identity and capture intricate details, such as facial structure, surface texture, or object-specific geometry, that exist below the level of linguistic abstraction. To address this fundamental gap, we propose Concept Distillation Sampling (CDS). To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to introduce a unified, training-free framework for target-less, multi-concept image editing. CDS overcomes this linguistic bottleneck of previous methods by anchoring the editing process in the certainty of pretrained LoRA adapters. We integrate a highly stable distillation backbone (featuring ordered timesteps, regularisation, and negative-prompt guidance) with a novel dynamic weighting mechanism. This approach enables the composition and control of multiple visual concepts directly within the diffusion process, utilising spatially-aware priors from pretrained LoRA adapters without causing concept clashing. Our method preserves instance concept identity without requiring reference samples of the desired edit. Extensive quantitative and qualitative evaluations demonstrate that CDS establishes a new state-of-the-art over existing training-free editing and multi-LoRA composition methods on the InstructPix2Pix and ComposLoRA benchmarks. Project Page: https://nickyfot.github.io/cds/.
Niki Foteinopoulou, Ignas Budvytis, Stephan Liwicki
Cambridge Research Laboratory, Toshiba Europe, Cambridge, UK · Independent Researcher, UK
While Diffusion Large Language Models (DLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in multi-modal generation, performing precise, training-free image editing remains an open challenge. Unlike continuous diffusion models, the discrete tokenization inherent in DLLMs hinders the application of standard noise inversion techniques, often leading to structural degradation during editing. In this paper, we introduce GIDE (Grounded Inversion for DLLM Image Editing), a unified framework designed to bridge this gap. GIDE incorporates a novel Discrete Noise Inversion mechanism that accurately captures latent noise patterns within the discrete token space, ensuring high-fidelity reconstruction. We then decompose the editing pipeline into grounding, inversion, and refinement stages. This design enables GIDE supporting various editing instructions (text, point and box) and operations while strictly preserving the unedited background. Furthermore, to overcome the limitations of existing single-step evaluation protocols, we introduce GIDE-Bench, a rigorous benchmark comprising 805 compositional editing scenarios guided by diverse multi-modal inputs. Extensive experiments on GIDE-Bench demonstrate that GIDE significantly outperforms prior training-free methods, improving Semantic Correctness by 51.83% and Perceptual Quality by 50.39%. Additional evaluations on ImgEdit-Bench confirm its broad applicability, demonstrating consistent gains over trained baselines and yielding photorealistic consistency on par with leading models.
Zifeng Zhu, Jiaming Han, Jiaxiang Zhao +2
Xi’an Jiaotong University · MMLab, The Chinese University of Hong Kong