A Comprehensive Review of Large Language Models for Nanophotonics: From Surrogate Modeling to Autonomous Design
Organizations: The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Electrical Engineering, University Park, PA 16802, USA · University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Chattanooga, TN 37403, USA
Abstract
Metasurfaces have revolutionized the development of photonic devices by enabling unprecedented precision in light manipulation. However, their design processes are often constrained by computationally expensive simulations and complex high-dimensional design spaces. Although deep learning has accelerated the design process by serving as a surrogate model, it remains constrained by task-specific architectures and lacks universal reasoning capabilities. This review surveys how Large Language Models (LLMs) are adding semantic interfaces, code generation, and tool orchestration to established numerical nanophotonic workflows. We first outline the development from classical neural networks to transformer-based models and their applications in nanophotonic design. We then review the emergence of LLM-related methods in nanophotonics and organize them into two operational modes: surrogate models that treat structure-spectrum mapping as a language task, and agentic systems that have been demonstrated to generate code, orchestrate selected simulation steps, and support closed-loop optimization. Furthermore, to identify future cross-disciplinary opportunities, we briefly explore applications of LLMs in research fields such as materials science and wireless communications. This review concludes by looking ahead to the next generation of multimodal foundation models with physical perception capabilities. In this vision, artificial intelligence is evolving from passive tools into active collaborators, participating in autonomous scientific discovery.
Figures & tables
| Review | Primary scope |
| 41 | Broad two-way interaction: classical DNNs for photonic design, imaging, communication, and materials |
| 42 | Classical DNNs for metasurface prediction/design and adaptive metadevices |
| 47 | Optimization, adjoint methods, discriminative/generative DL, devices, tools, and foundries |
| 48 | Classical AI methods across metasurface elements and optical systems |
| 45 | Model-centric AI-enabled metadevice design, high-DoF geometry, robustness, fabrication limitations, and transformers |
| 49 | AI across accelerated electromagnetic modeling and inverse design, optical-data characterization, end-to-end imaging, and autonomous metasurface systems |