Organizations: National Key Laboratory of Microwave Imaging Technology, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China, and also with the School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) object detection is an important part of remote sensing interpretation. However, because of variations in frequency band, resolution, background clutter, and target scattering responses, the performance of existing detectors often degrades when training and testing data are acquired from different SAR domains. Although domain adaptation methods offer a promising paradigm for solving this problem, most of them mainly pursue domain-invariant feature alignment and suppress sensor-dependent scattering characteristics that are useful for object detection. This problem becomes more challenging in few-shot scenarios, where only a few fully annotated target-domain SAR images are available. To address this issue, we propose a scattering-aware shared-specific feature decomposition framework for few-shot SAR domain adaptation object detection. We decompose detection features into a shared path and several soft-gated scattering-specific expert paths. The shared path learns transferable object structural information and is used for asymmetric domain alignment, while the scattering-specific experts adaptively compensate heterogeneous SAR responses. In addition, routing-domain auxiliary loss is introduced to encourage specific experts to capture sensor-dependent routing preferences, and an expert balancing loss is used to prevent routing collapse. Extensive experiments on four bidirectional heterogeneous SAR detection tasks between FARAD-X/FARAD-Ka and MiniSAR under different few-shot settings have been conducted and experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves superior performance in both forward and reverse adaptation directions.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Comparison between optical and cross-sensor SAR domain shifts. (a) Cityscapes and Foggy Cityscapes illustrate low-level visual variations caused by fog, which provide limited target-discriminative cues. (b) FARAD and MiniSAR show cross-sensor SAR discrepancies in clutter and target scattering responses. (c) Enlarged vehicle patches highlight shared target structures with green boxes and domain-specific scattering cues with blue dots.
Fig. 2: Overall framework of the proposed method. Source and few-shot target SAR images are fed into a shared feature extractor, followed by an MoE feature learning module composed of an always-on shared path and router-weighted scattering-specific experts. The shared representation is used for asymmetric domain alignment, while the aggregated expert features provide domain-sensitive compensation for object detection.
Fig. 3: Motivating t-SNE visualization of source and target feature distributions under the 1-shot FARAD-Ka → MiniSAR setting. AcroFOD shows limited source–target overlap, while AsyFOD produces a more concentrated target cluster but still leaves many source samples poorly matched.
Fig. 4: Examples of SAR images and corresponding optical scenes from the datasets used in our experiments. (a), (c), and (e) are SAR images from MiniSAR, FARAD-X, and FARAD-Ka, respectively. (b), (d), and (f) show the corresponding optical scenes on Google Earth.
Domain
FARAD-X
FARAD-Ka
MiniSAR
Band
X
Ka
Ku
Time
2015.10
2015.08
2005.05
Bandwidth
3 GHz
5 GHz
3 GHz
Center Freq.
9.6 GHz
35.6 GHz
16.8 GHz
Angle
26∘ – 34∘
26∘ – 34∘
26∘ – 29∘
Resolution
0.1 m
0.1 m
0.1 m
TABLE I: Imaging parameters and domain characteristics of the datasets.
Methods
(a) FARAD-X → MiniSAR
(b) FARAD-Ka → MiniSAR
1-shot
3-shot
5-shot
8-shot
10-shot
1-shot
3-shot
5-shot
8-shot
10-shot
Source-only [ 43 ]
22.46
25.77
FSDet [ 45 ]
19.38
30.42
36.84
41.01
47.69
27.72
37.33
44.07
53.36
45.26
SSDA-YOLO [ 42 ]
23.13
28.48
39.04
40.08
39.45
29.17
39.68
46.67
46.56
50.69
AcroFOD [ 46 ]
27.35
36.20
51.81
61.29
64.53
30.98
41.30
55.56
64.08
66.18
AsyFOD [ 17 ]
29.09
36.67
49.60
56.58
63.37
37.43
36.90
52.78
60.91
58.62
TABLE II: Comparison of different methods on bidirectional few-shot SAR domain adaptation tasks in terms of mAP 50 (%).
Fig. 5: Qualitative comparison on MiniSAR test images under the 5-shot FARAD-X → MiniSAR adaptation task. Each column represents one test scene, while the rows from top to bottom correspond to the ground truth, AcroFOD, AsyFOD † , and the proposed method. Green and red boxes denote ground-truth annotations and detection results, respectively.
Fig. 6: Visualization of P3 shared and expert activation responses on MiniSAR test images under the 5-shot FARAD-X → MiniSAR setting. From left to right: original image, shared path, and Experts 1–4.
Adaptation Task
Level
Expert 1
Expert 2
Expert 3
Expert 4
TVD (%)
Entropy
FARAD-X → MiniSAR
P3
23.01/22.78
28.47/29.02
24.44/24.23
24.08/23.97
0.55
0.9973/0.9966
P4
24.30/24.94
24.30/23.89
26.62/28.08
24.79/23.09
2.10
0.9993/0.9977
FARAD-Ka → MiniSAR
P3
22.97/22.76
26.73/26.87
27.12/27.35
23.18/23.02
0.37
0.9977/0.9973
P4
25.89/25.50
24.92/24.90
25.30/25.16
23.88/24.44
0.56
0.9996/0.9997
TABLE III: Domain-wise router distribution statistics on the source and target image sets. Each expert entry reports the source/target mean routing weights (%). TVD denotes the total variation distance between the source and target mean routing distributions, and entropy denotes the normalized source/target routing entropy.
Fig. 7: t-SNE visualization of source-domain and target-domain shared feature distributions under the 1-shot FARAD-Ka → MiniSAR adaptation task. Blue circles and orange triangles denote source-domain and target-domain samples, respectively. (a) AcroFOD. (b) AsyFOD † . (c) Ours. The proposed method shows a closer source–target distribution in the shared feature space, indicating more effective transferable representation learning for few-shot SAR domain adaptation.
Methods
FARAD-X → MiniSAR
FARAD-Ka → MiniSAR
1-shot
3-shot
5-shot
8-shot
10-shot
Avg.
1-shot
3-shot
5-shot
8-shot
10-shot
Avg.
AsyFOD † baseline
43.39
49.09
66.10
72.07
71.23
60.38
41.30
43.30
66.01
69.72
73.21
58.71
Fused-feature alignment
40.41
46.17
66.73
70.10
66.82
58.05
42.64
47.30
66.58
71.98
71.94
60.09
Shared only
46.16
50.43
58.57
74.19
71.51
60.17
41.67
46.83
61.69
74.15
74.73
59.81
w/o Lalignsh
28.37
40.61
55.59
63.79
59.31
49.53
36.50
42.85
54.19
63.74
64.92
52.44
w/o Lrd
46.32
50.17
63.81
73.92
72.71
61.39
41.05
51.67
68.01
69.55
73.10
60.68
TABLE IV: Ablation results of the proposed components in terms of mAP 50 (%).
Experts E
FARAD-X → MiniSAR
Avg.
1-shot
3-shot
5-shot
8-shot
10-shot
1
44.97
52.21
68.35
70.49
68.77
60.96
2
44.54
53.48
68.41
72.14
75.46
62.81
4
47.19
51.19
68.98
76.06
73.58
63.40
8
43.12
50.04
67.68
73.35
77.48
62.33
TABLE V: Effect of the number of scattering-specific experts on FARAD-X → MiniSAR in terms of mAP 50 (%).
Experts E
FARAD-Ka → MiniSAR
Avg.
1-shot
3-shot
5-shot
8-shot
10-shot
1
44.17
54.18
70.73
76.77
75.52
64.27
2
49.61
46.68
71.06
78.48
76.75
64.52
4
47.26
51.60
69.32
75.72
75.42
63.86
8
43.08
49.85
67.52
77.06
78.07
63.12
TABLE VI: Effect of the number of scattering-specific experts on FARAD-Ka → MiniSAR in terms of mAP 50 (%).
Current deep learning-based object detection for Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery mainly adopts optical image methods, treating targets as texture patches while ignoring inherent electromagnetic scattering mechanisms. Though scattering points have been studied to boost detection performance, most methods still rely on amplitude-based statistical models. Some approaches introduce frequency-domain information for scattering center extraction, but they suffer from high computation cost and poor compatibility with diverse datasets. Thus, effectively embedding scattering topological information into modern detection frameworks remains challenging. To solve these problems, this paper proposes the Physics-Aware Scattering Topology Embedding Framework (PASTE), a novel closed-loop architecture for comprehensive scattering prior integration. By building the full pipeline from topology generation, injection to joint supervision, PASTE elegantly integrates scattering physics into modern SAR detectors. Specifically, it designs a scattering keypoint generation and automatic annotation scheme based on the Attributed Scattering Center (ASC) model to produce scalable and physically consistent priors. A scattering topology injection module guides multi-scale feature learning, and a scattering prior supervision strategy constrains network optimization by aligning predictions with scattering center distributions. Experiments on real datasets show that PASTE is compatible with various detectors and brings relative mAP gains of 2.9% to 11.3% over baselines with acceptable computation overhead. Visualization of scattering maps verifies that PASTE successfully embeds scattering topological priors into feature space, clearly distinguishing target and background scattering regions, thus providing strong interpretability for results.
Jiacheng Chen, Yuxuan Xiong, Haipeng Wang
Key Laboratory for Information Science of Electromagnetic Waves (MoE), Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
Ship detection in Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery is challenged by coherent speckle noise, complex coastal clutter, and the prevalence of small-scale targets. Conventional detectors, primarily designed for optical imagery, often exhibit limited adaptability to SAR-specific degradation and suffer from the loss of fine-grained ship signatures during spatial downsampling. To address these limitations, we propose SARES-DEIM, a domain-aware detection framework grounded in the DEtection TRansformer (DETR) paradigm. Central to our approach is SARESMoE (SAR-aware Expert Selection Mixture-of-Experts), a module leveraging a sparse gating mechanism to selectively route features toward specialized wavelet, spatial, and frequency-oriented experts. This sparsely activated architecture enhances clutter-aware representation while keeping the active inference cost controlled. Furthermore, we introduce the Space-to-Depth Enhancement Pyramid (SDEP) neck to preserve high-resolution spatial cues from shallow stages and improve the localization of small targets. Experiments on HRSID and SAR-Ship-Dataset show that SARES-DEIM achieves competitive results across both public benchmarks, with more prominent advantages on the challenging HRSID dataset. Specifically, SARES-DEIM achieves 76.4% mAP50:95 and 93.8% mAP50 on HRSID, while keeping the active computation at 72.6 GFLOPs and 136.5 FPS on a single NVIDIA A40 GPU with batch size 8; the batch-size-1 latency is 37.6 ms.
Few-shot object detection (FSOD) is challenging due to unstable optimization and limited generalization arising from the scarcity of training samples. To address these issues, we propose a hybrid ensemble decoder that enhances generalization during fine-tuning. Inspired by ensemble learning, the decoder comprises a shared hierarchical layer followed by multiple parallel decoder branches, where each branch employs denoising queries either inherited from the shared layer or newly initialized to encourage prediction diversity. This design fully exploits pretrained weights without introducing additional parameters, and the resulting diverse predictions can be effectively ensembled to improve generalization. We further leverage a unified progressive fine-tuning framework with a plateau-aware learning rate schedule, which stabilizes optimization and achieves strong few-shot adaptation without complex data augmentations or extensive hyperparameter tuning. Extensive experiments on CD-FSOD, ODinW-13, and RF100-VL validate the effectiveness of our approach. Notably, on RF100-VL, which includes 100 datasets across diverse domains, our method achieves an average performance of 41.9 in the 10-shot setting, significantly outperforming the recent approach SAM3, which obtains 35.7. We further construct a mixed-domain test set from CD-FSOD to evaluate robustness to out-of-distribution (OOD) samples, showing that our proposed modules lead to clear improvement gains. These results highlight the effectiveness, generalization, and robustness of the proposed method. Code is available at: https://github.com/Intellindust-AI-Lab/FT-FSOD.
Xuanlong Yu, Youyang Sha, Longfei Liu +2
Intellindust AI Lab · Suzhou Institute for Advanced Research, USTC