rEDMRec: Distilling Large Language Model Reasoning into an Editable Experience Memory for Recommendation

Personal memory in a language model is two problems: content and reasoning skill. The brain keeps the two apart (a sparse, local engram in the hippocampus for each episode, a slow neocortex for the shared skills that interpret it), so a new fact need not overwrite everything else. Most personalization today keeps a user's facts outside the weights, in a natural-language memory file or a retrieval index. When facts are written into the model instead, the standard recipe is the per-user LoRA adapter, which does the opposite of the brain, folding content and skill into one global weight delta. Writing a user's facts as a LoRA contaminates text unrelated to them; writing the same facts as local Engram rows leaves it mathematically untouched, resulting in a roughly 33,000x smaller memory footprint. We therefore propose User as Engram: store a user's content as surgical edits to the hash-keyed memory table of an Engram model, and carry the reasoning skill in one shared adapter. This layered design matches per-user LoRA's direct recall while delivering 5.6x higher indirect-reasoning accuracy on average, and never makes a single user worse at reasoning than the untouched base. The edit is a glass box: writing a fact switches on its lookup at exactly the trigger, adds the value the answer needs, leaves every other position unchanged to the last bit, and fails if written into the wrong layer. Because different users' facts land in disjoint hash slots, their edits compose: many users live in one shared table at once, stacking additively and losslessly, where a per-user LoRA, a single global weight delta, admits only one. Upon retrieval, a per-user Engram table does not grow with the population the retriever must search, so past ~100 facts it overtakes a retrieval pipeline on a 2.5x larger model.

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong reasoning capabilities, motivating their use as the backbone of foundation recommendation models (FRMs). Existing methods enhance recommendations through explicit Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning under a Think-then-Answer paradigm. However, explicit CoT incurs substantial inference overhead by generating lengthy reasoning traces and relies on manually designed templates that struggle to capture diverse, dynamic user interests. We propose OneLatent, an efficient latent reasoning framework that compresses explicit reasoning traces into several learnable latent tokens, enabling Latent-Reason-then-Answer inference without generating verbose traces. OneLatent first introduces Multi-View Adaptive CoT (MV-ACoT), which creates diverse, high-quality teacher-generated supervision by exploring user interests from multiple perspectives and automatically adapting reasoning complexity to each instance. Building on pretrained FRMs, it then uses a three-stage latent-token alignment paradigm to progressively internalize CoT traces into learnable latent tokens. Finally, a multistage curriculum-based post-training strategy activates latent-token reasoning for downstream recommendation tasks. Experiments on an industrial-scale Kuaishou dataset and the public Kuaishou LLM-Rec benchmark show that OneLatent consistently outperforms explicit CoT-based methods and traditional baselines. Compared with the Think and No-Think variants of FRMs, OneLatent improves SID@64 by 17.44% and 9.33%, respectively, while achieving over 17x higher online inference throughput. We further develop a production serving system for scalable, real-time FRM inference. An online A/B test in Kuaishou's local-services advertising scenario shows that deploying OneLatent with this system yields an estimated 9.6% revenue lift over strong online baselines, including OneRec and OneReason.

Long-term language-model agents accumulate memories across interactions, but their retrievers typically do not accumulate retrieval experience. Semantic retrieval is efficient, but embedding similarity does not always reflect whether a memory contains evidence relevant to the current query. Large language model (LLM) rerankers provide stronger query-conditioned relevance scores, yet stateless reranking repeatedly scores a large candidate pool and discards these scores after each query. We introduce EARM, an experience-amortized reranking framework that treats previously acquired LLM relevance scores as reusable retrieval experience. EARM stores sparse query--memory relevance scores in an online matrix, learns their shared structure through causal matrix completion, and combines a small set of newly observed scores with estimated scores to rerank the remaining candidates. The scoring budget decreases as experience accumulates, changing LLM reranking from a repeated per-query expense into a retrieval capability learned over an agent's lifetime. Experiments on long-term conversational memory show that mixed observed-and-estimated reranking improves answer accuracy over semantic retrieval by up to 6.62% and remains effective when only 17.5% of candidates receive direct LLM relevance scores, thereby substantially reducing the inference overhead of LLM reranking. These results motivate a broader view of agent memory: a long-lived agent should remember not only past content, but also how that content has proved useful for retrieval.