Eureka: Task-Conditioned Meta-Agent Orchestration for Scientific Discovery

LLM-based agents have shown increasing potential in automating scientific discovery. Given an optimizable metric and an execution environment, they can propose, validate, and iterate scientific solutions, and have produced results that outperform human-designed approaches. As model capabilities continue to improve, we argue that the bottleneck for autonomous scientific discovery is shifting from prescribing agent workflows to designing agent environments: the resources, constraints, and interfaces that shape agent behavior. We frame this as environment engineering: building environments that amplify productive behaviors, such as open-ended exploration, systematic artifact management, and inter-agent collaboration, while suppressing harmful behaviors, such as reward hacking and high-friction human oversight. We present EurekAgent, an environment-engineered agent system for metric-driven autonomous scientific discovery. EurekAgent engineers the environment along four dimensions: permissions engineering for bounded agent execution and isolated evaluation; artifact engineering for filesystem and Git-based collaboration; budget engineering for budget-aware exploration; and human-in-the-loop engineering for easy human supervision and intervention. EurekAgent sets new state-of-the-art results on multiple mathematics, kernel engineering, and machine learning tasks, including new state-of-the-art 26-circle packing results discovered with less than $11 in total API cost. We open-source our code and results, and call for environment engineering as a core research direction for developing reliable autonomous research agents.

AI research agents are increasingly used to search over programs, mathematical constructions, and proofs. However, existing systems typically optimize evaluator feedback without adequately governing how that feedback is interpreted, challenged, and reused. As a result, promising but fragile candidates can be promoted as discoveries, while benchmark improvements, finite certificates, and theorem-level claims are too easily conflated. We introduce EPOCH, an evidence-governed architecture designed to close this gap. EPOCH implements an evidence-governed discovery loop by combining explicit task contracts, typed memory, active falsification, admission checks, and independent replay, so that each candidate is evaluated against the strength and scope of the claim it supports. EPOCH achieves state-of-the-art aggregate performance on AlgoTune, substantially exceeding the strongest baseline in mean normalized score (0.65 vs. 0.53), and attains the highest mean score on the internal Math14 suite (0.57). It further shows favorable held-out behavior under official-test replay and leads the descriptive aggregate on AgentHPO. Across ten discovery problems, EPOCH delivers substantial task-specific advances, including improved executable constructions, optimized algorithms, counterexamples, and proof-supported results. These advances demonstrate its ability to convert search into concrete progress across mathematical and computational domains. Together, the results suggest that evidence governance is a necessary step toward AI research agents that produce not only stronger solutions, but also more trustworthy scientific discoveries.

As agents take on longer and more complex problems, controlling the execution becomes a task in its own right. Each step in the run brings new control choices, like which partial work to build on, whether to start fresh, or when to stop. We introduce agentic meta-reasoning, an inference-time harness that makes these choices an explicit and structured reasoning process. Workers carry out the task-level computation, while a controller consolidates what the run has established, explores next options, assesses what each option is worth under the remaining budget, and dispatches the chosen work with context drawn from persistent memory. Between decisions the controller carries only a compact account of the run rather than replaying its full history. Our baselines span production coding agents and research harnesses, together with a Direct Control Agent using the same workers and compute budget allowance. On ProgramBench, which tests long-horizon agentic capability through program reconstruction, meta-reasoning achieves 71.5% with GPT-5.5 against 58.0% for Codex; with Opus 4.8 it achieves 67.2% against 65.5% for Claude Code. On the other benchmarks, spanning abstract reasoning, multi-domain long-horizon reasoning, and proof generation, it gains between 3.6 and 4.2 points over direct control, averaged across three frontier models. It keeps improving over the tested budget ranges where direct control plateaus, though its overhead can hurt at small budgets. Artifact-graph analysis reveals more reuse of earlier work, higher coverage of correct solutions in most settings, and nonuniform gains in final selection. These results indicate that spending computation on structured control becomes more important as agents scale to longer runs.