Anchored Regularized Direct Least Squares (ARDLS): Integrating Established Prioritization Operators for Priority Elicitation in the Analytic Hierarchy Process
Authors: Kevin Kam Fung Yuen
Organizations: School of Science, Monash University Malaysia, Sunway, Malaysia
Pairwise reciprocal matrices are fundamental to the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP),a decision-making model. While the Direct Least Squares (DLS) method provides an intuitive mechanism for deriving priority vectors without complex transformations, it is susceptible to solution non-uniqueness. Under high levels of inconsistency, such as severe cyclic contradictions, the DLS optimization landscape becomes non-convex, yielding multiple distinct global minima. Consequently, priority rankings become unstable and critically dependent on initial algorithmic guesses. Furthermore, established prioritization operators (POs), including normalization techniques, the Eigenvector method, Singular Value Decomposition, Cosine Maximization, and the Pseudo-Inverse Gram Matrix (the closed-form solution of Weighted Least Squares), frequently generate disparate outcomes. To overcome these structural deficiencies, this paper introduces the Anchored Regularized Direct Least Squares (ARDLS) optimization model as a harmonizing framework. ARDLS integrates uniquely determined established POs as theoretical anchors within a regularization penalty. This integration systematically breaks mathematical symmetries and tilts the optimization landscape to guarantee convergence upon a single, unique global minimum. By minimizing the root mean square variance (RMSV) of the initial baseline vectors, ARDLS effectively unifies these divergent solutions. Comprehensive numerical experiments validate that the framework successfully fine-tune the solution of established POs by reducing RMSV while ensuring strict mathematical uniqueness. The practical utility of the method is further demonstrated through a numerical case study resolving an innovation fund dilemma in FinTech project selection. The proposed ARDLS approach offers a robust alternative to classical AHP across a wide range of decision-making domains.
Pairwise comparison (PC) via pairwise reciprocal matrices (PRMs) is central to the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Although the traditional eigenvector method is widely applied to derive priorities, its theoretical robustness in reflecting true priority vectors remains debated. Building upon a previous iteration of this study, this research develops the revised Least Penalty-Squared Prioritization (LPSP) optimization models, including the revised Least Product of Penalty and Direct Squares (LPPDS) and revised Weighted Squares (LPPWS), to minimize the revised Root Mean Penalty-Squared Variance (RMPSV) and the revised Root Mean Penalty-Weighted Square Variance (RMPSWV). However, solving these non-linear formulations is computationally complex for decision-makers. To overcome these limitations, this study proposes the Parallel Osprey Optimized Least Penalty-Squared Prioritization (POO-LPSP) method. By integrating an improved bio-inspired metaheuristic Parallel Osprey Optimization Algorithm (POOA), this framework efficiently solves complex LPSP models to minimize RMPSV and RMPSWV, thereby enhancing prioritization reliability. The practical utility and computational efficiency of the POO-LPSP method are validated through a numerical application focusing on a Generative AI (GAI) vendor selection problem. To extend, POO-LPSP can serve as a robust alternative to Saaty's Eigen system method for AHP applications.
Kevin Kam Fung Yuen
School of Science, Monash University Malaysia, Sunway, Malaysia
For many years, the pairwise comparison method has been widely used for decision-making involving experts. The best-known example of this method is the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). In this now classic approach, the weights of alternatives are calculated using the principal eigenvector of the comparison matrix. In this paper, we present a statistical view of the pairwise comparison method, using reference values and the geometric mean to calculate alternative priorities. Thanks to this approach, we can simultaneously capture both the phenomenon of inconsistency in pairwise comparisons and the preference distance between alternatives. In this paper, we define indicators that measure the quality of the obtained weight vector, which, thanks to the statistical approach, have a clear and intuitive interpretation.
Konrad Kułakowski, Jacek Szybowski
AGH University of Krakow, WEAiIB, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Poland · AGH University of Krakow, WMS, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Poland
The paper addresses several ranking-dependent decision support methods. Ordinal information on compared objects can be used to improve the quality of expert data during estimation and help reduce the number of comparisons that the experts need to perform. In the paper we compare three incomplete ranking-dependent pair-wise comparison patterns which can be used in the Analytic Hierarchy Process - Best-worst method, Best-Second Best (Top 2) method, and the original maximum difference method. The first two comparison patterns (and respective methods) are incomplete, while the third can be a complete one. We determine conditions under which these three methods can be compared in terms of stability to expert errors. We also present the results of a simulation-type experiment, in which the three methods are compared. The research allows us to define the most stable incomplete ranking-dependent pair-wise comparison pattern and reduce the number of comparisons without loss of credibility of expert session results. The research contributes to algorithmic, cognitive, and applied aspects of decision support in uncertain environments.
Vitaliy Tsyganok, Sergii Kadenko, Oleh Andriichuk
Institute for Information Recording National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Kyiv, Ukraine 03113