Overview

Pairwise comparison studies how judgments between two items can reveal preferences, rankings, or relative quality when absolute scores are difficult to assign. Common approaches include Bradley–Terry and Elo models, low-rank statistical models, active learning to choose informative pairs, and reward models trained on preference data. These methods are used in LLM leaderboards and preference alignment, as well as recommender systems and image, audio, and video quality assessment. A central challenge is that rankings can be sensitive to judge bias, sampling noise, and non-transitive preferences, and a preferred result is not necessarily safer or objectively better.

Latest papers

CardsList

79 papers1 paper in the last four weeks, against 1 the four weeks before. 0.0% of all new papers.

  1. Rarity Determines Minimax Rates of Semantic Entropy From Weak Pairwise Judgments With a Known Channel

    Oct 13, 2026Xiaoli Yu, Jiamiao LiuSemantic EntropyMinimax Estimation

  2. Stability of Ranking-dependent Pair-wise Comparison Patterns in the Analytic Hierarchy Process

    Aug 6, 2026Vitaliy Tsyganok, Sergii Kadenko, Oleh AndriichukPairwise ComparisonPairwise Preference Evaluation

  3. string2string Studio: An Interactive, In-Browser Platform for String-to-String Algorithms

    Aug 4, 2026Mirac Suzgun, James Zou, Stuart M. Shieber +1Pairwise ComparisonSequence Alignment

  4. ParEvalLayer: When Partial LLM-Agent Evaluations Support a Decision

    Aug 3, 2026Wei-Jung Huang, Bonan ShenPairwise ComparisonLLM Agent Evaluation

  5. Isotonic Bradley-Terry Model for Paired Comparison Data

    Aug 3, 2026Ryoya YamasakiPairwise Preference LearningPairwise Comparison

  6. Ranking Infrared-Visible Fusion the Way Humans Do: A Learned Pairwise Preference Measure

    Aug 2, 2026Haoran Liu, Mingzhe Liu, Peng Li +1Pairwise Preference LearningMulti-Source Image Fusion

  7. ModelEquivBench: Certifying Multi-Relational Evaluation of LLM-Generated Optimization Models

    Jul 31, 2026Penglin Zhu, Jungang XuLLM EvaluationPairwise Comparison

  8. Contrastive Concept Importance: Explaining Pairwise Class Decisions Through Automatically Extracted Concept Representations

    Jul 30, 2026Roel Visser, Isaac Roberts, Barbara HammerFeature AttributionPairwise Comparison

  9. On Generalizing Preference-based Reinforcement Learning to Multi-Objective Problems

    Jul 13, 2026Simone Drago, Marco Mussi, Leonardo Bianconi +1Pairwise Preference LearningPairwise Comparison

  10. Geometric mean-based pairwise comparison method with the reference values -- statistical approach

    Jul 10, 2026Konrad Kułakowski, Jacek SzybowskiPairwise ComparisonPairwise Preference Evaluation

  11. Optimal Top-kk Identification from Pairwise Comparisons

    Jul 9, 2026Motti Goldberger, Nils RudiPairwise Preference LearningMulti-Armed Bandits

  12. Attention Limited Reward Learning

    Jul 6, 2026Wenqian XingPairwise Preference LearningReward Modeling

  13. On Pairwise Quantile Regression -- Statistical Guarantees and Applications

    Jul 5, 2026Romain Thérézien, Stephan Clémençon, Fantin Girard +1Pairwise ComparisonQuantile Regression

  14. Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation

    Jul 3, 2026Saeed Mahmoudpour, Mylene C. Q. Farias, Gi-Mun Um +6Pairwise ComparisonBenchmark Validity

  15. Ask the Right Comparison:Bias-Aware Bayesian Active Top-kk Ranking with LLM Judges

    Jul 2, 2026Jian Xu, Delu Zeng, John Paisley +1Pairwise ComparisonLLM-as-a-Judge

  16. Can LLMs Rank? A Tale of Triads and Triage

    Jun 29, 2026Gaurab Pokharel, Shafkat Farabi, Patrick J. Fowler +1Pairwise ComparisonSocial Choice Theory

  17. What a Pooled Leaderboard Does Not Say: Auditing the Scope and Provenance of Method Comparisons in Microservice RCA Benchmarks

    Jun 28, 2026Lining Hu, Ting Liu, Yuzhuo FuPairwise ComparisonAlgorithmic Auditing

  18. ParaPairAudioBench: Paralinguistic Pairwise Audio Benchmark for LALM-as-a-Judge

    Jun 23, 2026Jisu Jeon, Seungyeon Jwa, Joosung Lee +6Audio-Language Model EvaluationPairwise Comparison

  19. To Compare, or Not to Compare: On Methodological Practices in Evaluating Social Bias

    Jun 23, 2026Federico Marcuzzi, Xuefei Ning, Roy Schwartz +1Pairwise ComparisonLLM Auditing

  20. Comparative Reasoning: Making an Audio Language Model Better at Comparing Emotions

    Jun 23, 2026Abinay Reddy Naini, Jaeyeon Kim, Chao-Han Huck Yang +2Audio-Language Model EvaluationPairwise Comparison

  21. A Markov Chain Approach to Preference Alignment

    Jun 21, 2026Takuya Koriyama, Tengyuan LiangPairwise Preference LearningPairwise Comparison

  22. Which Pairs to Compare for LLM Post-Training?

    Jun 17, 2026Jiangze Han, Vineet Goyal, Will MaPairwise Preference LearningPairwise Comparison

  23. Prompt Perturbation for Reliable LLM Evaluation over Comparison Graphs

    Jun 16, 2026Dong Huang, Jianbo Sun, Pengkun YangLLM EvaluationPairwise Comparison

  24. TuneJury: An Open Metric for Improving Music Generation Preference Alignment

    Jun 15, 2026Yonghyun Kim, Junwon Lee, Haiwen Xia +5Text-to-Music GenerationMusic Generation Evaluation