Evaluating Multimodal Narrative Understanding of Popular Hollywood Films
Organizations: School of Information, UC Berkeley · Cinema Studies, Bowdoin College · UC Berkeley · Scholarly Communication and Information Policy, UC Berkeley
Abstract
Multimodal language models increasingly show promise for enabling the large-scale computational analysis of film, opening up new avenues for learning about film history and the evolution of narrative techniques. But the creation of stable benchmarks built around Hollywood films is complicated by copyright protections. In this work, we address these concerns directly, by building a new collection of Hollywood films defined by two criteria: box office popularity (where we publish the first large-scale, open collection of weekly box office earnings reported by Variety magazine from 1922-1979); and likely public domain status (by researching copyright registrations and renewals in the US Catalog of Copyright Entries). We build a new multimodal MCQ benchmark on top of this collection that focuses on narrative elements that directly evaluate the abilities of models to inform meaningful research on film narrative; we find that many vision-language models struggle on this task (with many performing at near-chance levels of accuracy), while audio-visual models (including those that use audio in captioning scenes) reach a maximum accuracy of 61.1%, well below human-level performance.
Figures & tables
| Model Compute Acc. Closed-book (question only) Qwen3-VL-8B 0h 07m 21.5 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 2h 46m 20.4 GPT-5-mini 0h 03m 25.2 Claude Haiku 4.5 0h 09m 22.1 Gemini 3 Flash 2h 47m 26.6 Subtitles only Qwen3-VL-8B 0h 20m 32.2 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 31h 21m 27.7 GPT-5-mini 9h 22m 39.2 Claude Haiku 4.5 0h 08m 36.9 Gemini 3 Flash 2h 04m 48.1 End-to-end long-video (64 frames) VAMBA-Qwen2-VL-7B 1h 47m 23.7 VideoChat-Flash 1h 04m 27.2 HourLLaVA 1h 02m 23.4 LLaVA-NeXT-Video-7B-DPO 0h 15m 25.0 vision–language (256 frames) Qwen3-VL-8B 4h 43m 29.1 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 6h 54m 24.2 GPT-5-mini 7h 52m 34.2 Gemini 3 Flash 6h 22m 39.3 audio-visual (full video) Gemini 3 Flash 37h 24m 61.1 | Model Compute Acc. Socratic frame-based Qwen3-VL-8B 1h 36m 30.3 GPT-5-mini 4h 42m 36.8 Claude Haiku 4.5 0h 58m 35.0 Gemini 3 Flash 7h 15m 46.0 clip-based Qwen3-VL-8B 1h 44m 32.8 GPT-5-mini 3h 30m 48.1 Claude Haiku 4.5 1h 02m 45.9 Gemini 3 Flash 2h 53m 58.9 Agentic retrieval frame image (VideoAgent) Qwen3-VL-8B 16h 00m 22.9 GPT-5-mini 9h 22m 24.8 Claude Haiku 4.5 1h 53m 26.1 Gemini 3 Flash 2h 04m 28.8 frame caption (Letta) Qwen3-VL-8B 1h 31m 26.1 GPT-5-mini 1h 57m 33.6 Claude Haiku 4.5 3h 27m 39.8 Gemini 3 Flash 4h 48m 26.6 clip caption (Letta) Qwen3-VL-8B 1h 50m 26.8 GPT-5-mini 2h 13m 26.0 Claude Haiku 4.5 1h 51m 41.2 Gemini 3 Flash 6h 51m 30.3 |
Appendix figures & tables6 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Model | Movie F1 | Tuple F1 | |
| Gemini 3 Pro | 0.966 [0.953-0.977] | 0.921 [0.909-0.934] | 0.825 [0.800-0.851] |
| - (high low thinking level) | 0.934 [0.912-0.950] | 0.858 [0.802-0.896] | 0.711 [0.636-0.770] |
| - (ultrahigh high res) | 0.916 [0.887-0.938] | 0.847 [0.800-0.886] | 0.609 [0.533-0.680] |
| - (pro flash) | 0.930 [0.903-0.951] | 0.858 [0.826-0.886] | 0.675 [0.633-0.728] |
| GPT 5.4 (original res) | 0.916 [0.893-0.937] | 0.809 [0.774-0.845] | 0.684 [0.645-0.725] |
| - (mini) | 0.605 [0.493-0.699] | 0.388 [0.329-0.451] | 0.083 [0.048-0.128] |
| Category | Exclusion rate | count | count |
| Representation | 0.389 | 22 | 36 |
| Symbolism | 0.241 | 22 | 29 |
| Temporality | 0.221 | 53 | 68 |
| Plot | 0.209 | 155 | 196 |
| Object Identification | 0.200 | 92 | 115 |
| Character | 0.167 | 135 | 162 |
| Backbone | |||
| End-to-end vision-language models | |||
| GPT-5-mini | 30.6 [27.2–33.9] | 32.8 [29.3–36.3] | 34.2 [30.7–37.7] |
| Qwen3-VL-8B | 25.3 [22.0–28.5] | 29.8 [26.4–33.1] | 28.8 [25.5–32.2] |
| GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 25.8 [22.6–29.0] | 25.6 [22.5–28.8] | 24.2 [21.2–27.4] |
| End-to-end long-video models | |||
| HourLLaVA | 23.6 [20.4–26.8] | 24.7 [21.5–27.9] | 26.3 [23.1–29.5] |
| Title | Year | IMDB Genres | Director | Production Company |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| McLintock! | 1963 | Comedy, Western | Andrew V. McLaglen | Batjac Productions |
| Beneath the 12-Mile Reef | 1953 | Adventure, Drama, Romance | Robert D. Webb | 20th Century Fox |
| Cyrano de Bergerac | 1951 | Adventure, Drama, Romance | Michael Gordon | Stanley Kramer Productions |
| Go for Broke! | 1951 | Drama, History, War | Robert Pirosh | Loew’s |
| Royal Wedding | 1951 | Comedy, Musical, Romance | Stanley Donen | Loew’s |
| Three Guys Named Mike | 1951 | Comedy, Romance | Charles Walters | Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) |
Video-Language Model Evaluation
Video-language model evaluation measures whether multimodal systems understand, ground, and reliably use visual and audio evidence over time.
See all 99 papers