Multimodal large reasoning models often rely on long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) traces in which a substantial fraction of tokens, such as repeated visual descriptions, self-reflection, and other visually-disengaged filler, inflate inference cost without contributing to the answer. Existing CoT compression methods optimize output length but never measure whether a reasoning token is actually grounded in the image. We propose VIG (Visual Information Gain), an information-theoretic GRPO reward that scores each reasoning token by how much the image reduces its predictive uncertainty. VIG is computed online from two forward passes of the same policy, one with and one without the image, so no reference chains, external annotations, or auxiliary reward models are needed. Across six main multimodal reasoning benchmarks and three Qwen3-VL-Thinking model sizes (2B/4B/8B), plus an additional R1-Onevision-Bench evaluation on 8B, VIG consistently improves the accuracy--efficiency trade-off, supporting our central claim: efficient multimodal reasoning emerges from raising visual information density, where every reasoning token earns its place by anchoring to the image, rather than from imposing a length budget. Our source code is available at https://github.com/chaser682/vig.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Accuracy–efficiency Pareto frontier on Qwen3-VL-8B-Thinking. Each point reports the average accuracy (AvgACC, %) and efficiency (AvgEff, ACC per 1k tokens) of one method across the six multimodal benchmarks in Table 1 . VIG ( ★ ) Pareto-dominates the evaluated baselines (Base, GRPO, L1, ThinkPrune, TALE) on both axes, defining a new accuracy–efficiency Pareto frontier (red dashed lines).
Figure 2: Length penalties trim the chain; only visually grounded reasoning removes the redundancy at its source. Token counts and final answers from Base, L1, and our VIG model on the same geometry question (gold answer A, 2cm ).
Figure 3: VIG framework overview. Two forward passes over the generated reasoning chain—one with the image and one with visual tokens removed—yield a token-level entropy difference, which is aggregated into RVIG and used as a GRPO reward.
Method
WeMath
MMMU
MathVision
DynaMath
MMK12
Geo3K
Summary
ACC
TLen
ACC
TLen
ACC
TLen
ACC
TLen
ACC
TLen
ACC
TLen
AvgACC
AvgTLen
AvgEff
Qwen3-VL-2B-Thinking
51.72
3120
36.78
2855
15.39
3928
51.60
2252
33.25
3683
33.78
3087
37.09
3154.2
12.71
GRPO
57.36
2850
45.00
2614
17.17
3825
54.27
2046
36.70
3592
38.60
2929
41.52
2975.9
15.29
L1
61.67
2241
43.33
2561
17.14
3668
53.65
1926
34.30
3429
35.94
2670
41.01
2749.0
16.74
TALE
53.39
3033
40.00
2667
17.24
3872
54.01
2096
35.20
3595
36.11
3040
39.32
3050.5
14.08
ThinkPrune
60.80
2438
42.56
2372
17.53
3708
55.53
1863
39.70
3413
37.44
2679
42.26
2745.5
17.17
Table 1: Main results on six benchmarks. Bold and underline denote the best and second-best results within each model block; tied values share the same marking.
Method
Physics (278)
Mathematics (327)
Biology (134)
Chemistry (105)
Deduction (98)
Overall
ACC
TLen
ACC
TLen
ACC
TLen
ACC
TLen
ACC
TLen
AvgACC
AvgTLen
AvgEff
Qwen3-VL-8B-Thinking
53.96
2793
45.26
2894
56.72
2121
60.95
2315
17.35
3953
48.30
2799.8
18.48
GRPO
61.87
2444
47.09
2775
62.69
1845
64.76
2125
24.49
3836
53.29
2583.1
22.62
L1
61.51
2338
48.32
2708
59.70
1844
68.57
2101
21.43
3676
53.29
2508.9
23.00
TALE
56.83
2149
48.62
2565
61.94
1621
68.57
1647
23.47
3444
52.55
2297.1
26.41
ThinkPrune
59.35
2416
46.48
2808
58.21
1671
63.81
1993
26.53
3797
51.80
2542.8
22.99
Table 2: Performance comparison on R1-Onevision-Bench. Bold and underline denote the best and second-best results.
Method
RealWorldQA
OCRBench
ACC
TLen
ACC
TLen
Qwen3-VL-4B-Thinking
67.84
784
77.70
587
GRPO
68.10
635
77.30
483
L1
67.19
1116
76.00
779
ThinkPrune
68.10
453
77.50
367
VIG (Ours)
68.63
374
78.30
201
Table 3: Evaluation results on non-mathematical visual tasks with Qwen3-VL-4B-Thinking. All models use the same checkpoints as the 4B block of Table 1 . Bold and underline denote the best and second-best results.
Factor
Variant
AvgACC
AvgTLen
AvgEff
Reward
w/o VIG
62.88
1975.4
36.44
w/ VIG
64.92
1524.3
52.42
Vision pass
masked image
62.98
1885.0
38.70
no image
64.92
1524.3
52.42
wv
0.5
63.06
1676.1
45.04
1.0
64.92
1524.3
52.42
Table 4: Ablation results on Qwen3-VL-8B-Thinking. All values are averaged over the six benchmarks of Table 1 .
Figure 4: Average per-token VIG decreases as reasoning chains lengthen ( r=−0.569 , p<0.001 ): long chains are dominated by visually-disengaged tokens, exactly the redundancy VIG suppresses.
Figure 5: Accuracy and mean chain length stratified by per-sample average VIG (WeMath, n=1,740 ): higher visual density co-occurs with both higher accuracy and shorter chains. This association is descriptive; it is partly mediated by chain length and item difficulty (§ 4.4 ).
Appendix figures & tables7 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
(a) Reward ablation
Reward
AvgACC
AvgTLen
GRPO (no visual term)
69.33
1751
Confidence-only ( −Hvis )
68.21
1441
VIG (ours)
71.37
1297
Appendix
Table 5: Signal-integrity controls on Qwen3-VL-8B-Thinking. All arms share identical data, seed, and step count. (a) Reward ablation, 5-benchmark macro-average. (b) VIG vs. GRPO split by whether the base model solves the item without the image, 6-benchmark macro-average.
(a) VIG-8B chains
Deleted
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
lowest-VIG
80.92
79.94
78.22
75.17
72.36
random
81.84
80.92
80.06
79.25
77.41
highest-VIG
82.07
81.95
81.78
81.32
80.75
Appendix
Table 6: Quantile-deletion probe (WeMath, n=1,740 ). Sentences are ranked by VIG, a fraction is deleted, and the answer is re-decoded from the surviving prefix with the image still in context. Bold marks the most damaging condition per block.
Figure 6: Sentence-level VIG within complete VIG-8B chains, shown beside the input image. Sentences that read a quantity off the figure score highest ( +1.16 , +0.73 ), while symbolic manipulation scores near zero even when answer-bearing (“Divide both sides by 2”, +0.01 ).
Method
s/it
Wall-clock
GPU-h
Rel.
GRPO
31.8
4h 25m
35.3
1.00×
L1
33.5
4h 39m
37.2
1.05×
ThinkPrune
32.3
4h 29m
35.8
1.01×
VIG (Ours)
37.2
5h 10m
41.3
1.17×
Appendix
Table 7: Training cost on Qwen3-VL-8B-Thinking (8 × H20, 500 GRPO steps). Rel. is the relative wall-clock cost vs. plain GRPO.
Figure 7: Additional cases ( ⋮ : omitted sentences). (a) Reading the ruler scores +0.90 , the answer-bearing arithmetic +0.004 . (b) A failure case: every sentence is visually dependent, yet the model misreads the protractor as 50∘ instead of 40∘ . High VIG certifies image-driven generation, not a correct reading.
Figure 8: An additional qualitative comparison between Base, L1, and VIG. VIG produces a shorter reasoning chain while preserving the key visual evidence needed for the final answer.
Figure 9: A second qualitative example comparing Base, L1, and VIG. Compared with the baseline methods, VIG better concentrates its reasoning on the visually relevant information and avoids unnecessary self-reflection.
Multimodal chain-of-thought reasoning studies how AI models combine visual, audio, and textual evidence through intermediate reasoning to solve complex tasks.
Processing long visual token sequences from high-resolution images makes multi-step reasoning computationally expensive for multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). Existing one-shot pruning and aggregation methods compress visual tokens into a fixed context before decoding. However, visual evidence needs can shift as reasoning unfolds, making it difficult for a fixed compressed context to retain all the details needed across stages. To address this challenge, we propose ViMoD, a lightweight framework that maintains a compact visual context while preserving access to original fine-grained evidence as reasoning needs evolve. Deformable Aggregation of Region-wise Tokens (DART) learns content-adaptive groups and aggregation capacities, constructing compact Coarse representations linked to recoverable original Fine tokens. Temporal Routing for Adaptive Contextual Evidence (TRACE) integrates decoding history to anticipate upcoming evidence needs and select, retain, or replace active Fine-token groups. Selected Fine tokens augment the persistent Coarse context in the frozen backbone, enabling stage-specific evidence access without continuously attending to all visual tokens. On Qwen3-VL-4B, ViMoD outperforms all evaluated baselines on all eight reasoning benchmarks at a 20% target visual token budget, improving the mean normalized score by 39.0% over the strongest evaluated one-shot baseline. These gains are achieved with only 0.0546% additional trainable parameters relative to the frozen backbone.
Yicheng Xue, Han Wu, Jufeng Yang +4
City University of Hong Kong · Zhejiang University · Peking University +2
Recently, multimodal large-scale reasoning models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in solving complex tasks through long Chains-of-Thought (M-CoT). However, excessively long reasoning trajectories incur substantial computational costs and significant KV-cache pressure. Existing CoT compression and alignment paradigms mainly rely on static rules or single-dimensional preferences, lacking fine-grained cross-modal constraints; as a result, they are prone to inducing visual laziness and hallucinatory reasoning. To address these issues, we propose Modality-Contrastive Preference Optimization (MCPO), a highly sample-efficient two-stage length-compression method that requires fewer than 900 training samples. In the compression stage, we introduce a step-level Normalized Cross-Modal Mutual Information (NCMI) pruning algorithm, which automatically identifies and removes visual-independent reasoning steps by comparing the reasoning discrepancies between with-image and no-image contexts. This significantly reduces redundancy and hallucinatory content in the reasoning chains. In the alignment stage, the model first undergoes supervised fine-tuning to achieve domain-adaptive initialization, followed by optimization using an asymmetric multimodal length-controlled preference loss. This objective adopts a highly nonlinear odds-ratio formulation that provides steep gradients in the with-image context to reinforce length constraints for preferred trajectories, while applying a scaled, flat-gradient linear difference in the no-image context to maintain modality consistency, thereby achieving stable cross-modal preference alignment. Extensive experiments on mainstream base models such as Qwen3-VL-Thinking show that our method can reduce CoT length by up to 69.5% and achieve up to 3.34x end-to-end inference speedup while preserving original accuracy.
Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning has proven effective for enhancing problem-solving in large language models. However, when applied to multimodal LLMs (MLLMs), existing CoT approaches suffer from a fundamental limitation: they perform reasoning entirely in text without accessing visual features during the reasoning process. After initial visual encoding, image information becomes inaccessible, forcing models to reason based solely on whatever was captured in the initial description, which forms a `vision-blind reasoning' paradigm that limits fine-grained visual extraction, error verification, and adaptive attention. We propose Text-Visual Interleaved Chain-of-Thought (TVI-CoT), a framework that enables explicit interleaving of textual reasoning and visual feature access through learnable control tokens <THINK>, <LOOK> and <ANSWER>. These tokens allow dynamic switching between reasoning and visual grounding, attending to relevant image regions conditioned on the evolving reasoning state. Experiments on eight benchmarks demonstrate state-of-the-art results among MLLM-based CoT methods and notable performance boost compared to the baseline: +6.1% on MMMU, +3.8% on MathVerse, +3.4% on MathVista, and +3.4% on ScienceQA. Code is available at https://github.com/hulianyuyy/TVI-CoT.
Lianyu Hu, Xiaoyu Ma, Zeqin Liao +1
College of Computing and Data Science of Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.