Register Shifts Break LLM Safety: A Bengali Benchmark with Culturally Grounded Harms

Bangla large language model (LLM) safety is difficult to evaluate with English-centric or standard-script benchmarks because Bangla users routinely write across scripts, spellings, code-mixed forms, and regional registers. This paper presents BanglaVeilGuard, a compact Bangla-first safety benchmark and lightweight prompt guard for six language forms: standard Bangla, Romanized Bangla, Banglish, code-mixed Bangla--English, noisy Bangla, and dialectal Bangla. The benchmark contains 2,366 quality-filtered prompts and a held-out 354-prompt evaluation split spanning unsafe, safe, and safe-sensitive requests. BanglaVeilGuard uses non-destructive multi-view normalization with a prompt-risk classifier and thresholded pre-generation gate, allowing it to screen prompts for heterogeneous target models without changing their weights. Across target-model families, guarded runs reduce attack success under deterministic response scoring from 93.8--100.0% to 6.3% for Claude Opus 4.8, BanglaLLama, and TituLLM; TigerLLM-1B with BanglaVeilGuard achieves 78.2% accuracy with 8.8% ASR. The prompt guard also attains 88.5% unsafe recall, substantially above the evaluated prompt-only guard baselines. The main remaining cost is over-refusal on dialectal and noisy benign prompts, revealing a concrete safety-helpfulness frontier for Bangla LLM deployment.

Safety classifiers for large language models (LLMs) are typically built and evaluated on standard-script text, yet Bangla, like many lower-resource languages, is routinely written in native script, in Latin-script romanization, and code-mixed with English, Hindi, or Urdu. We introduce BanglaShield, a resource and model for graded prompt-safety classification across these written forms. We consolidate 10,245 Bangla prompts from six sources under a four-level taxonomy (Safe, Offensive, Harmful, Severe) and render each prompt in three aligned forms that share labels and a group-aware split, enabling strictly paired comparisons. Benchmarking six contemporary LLMs, including a Bangla-specialized one, on 36,882 classification queries and 24,318 judged responses, we find that LLM classifiers label 47.0% of unsafe native-script prompts as Safe, rising to 63.4% under romanization, while response-level safety accuracy drops by 10.3 points. Three multilingual guard models also pass 30.3-57.3% of unsafe native-script prompts. Using a model's own classification as an input filter reduces harmful compliance by only about five points. In contrast, BanglaShield, a compact fine-tuned encoder, reaches 87.8 macro-F1 on native-script and 84.4 on romanized prompts, outperforming the best LLM on each form by 42.8-46.1 points with ~130x fewer parameters than Gemma 4 31B. We release the corpus, splits, judgments, and model.

As large language models (LLMs) are deployed in multilingual settings, their safety behavior in culturally diverse, low-resource languages remains poorly understood. We present the first systematic evaluation of LLM safety across 12 Indic languages, spoken by over 1.2 billion people but underrepresented in LLM training data. Using a dataset of 6,000 culturally grounded prompts spanning caste, religion, gender, health, and politics, we assess 10 leading LLMs on translated variants of the prompt. Our analysis reveals significant safety drift: cross-language agreement is just 12.8%, and SAFE rate variance exceeds 17% across languages. Some models over-refuse benign prompts in low-resource scripts, overflag politically sensitive topics, while others fail to flag unsafe generations. We quantify these failures using prompt-level entropy, category bias scores, and multilingual consistency indices. Our findings highlight critical safety generalization gaps in multilingual LLMs and show that safety alignment does not transfer evenly across languages. We release IndicSafe, the first benchmark to enable culturally informed safety evaluation for Indic deployments, and advocate for language-aware alignment strategies grounded in regional harms.