Comparative Assessment of Deep Learning Architectures for Underwater Subsurface Kelp Forest Segmentation with The Kelp-o-Tron
Authors: Sundarabalan Balasubramanian, César Borja, Ana C. Murillo, Lexi N. Wilkes, Meredith L. McPherson, Kira A. Krumhansl, Jennifer A. Dijkstra, Jarrett E. K. Byrnes
Organizations: Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA 02125 USA · DIIS-i3A, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain · Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Dartmouth, NS, B3A 2T2 Canada · Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
Submerged kelp forests are vital coastal ecosystems that support marine biodiversity and ecosystem dynamics, yet accurate underwater kelp segmentation remains challenging due to optical degradation, illumination variability, turbidity, overlapping vegetation, and complex benthic backgrounds. We systematically evaluated three deep learning semantic segmentation frameworks, ResNet34-U-Net, ResNet50-DeepLabV3, and a hybrid ResNet50-ASPP-Transformer architecture, for kelp detection using high-resolution underwater RGB imagery collected from northeastern U.S. coastal waters. A dataset of 3,395 SSeg assisted annotated image-mask pairs was developed for model training and validation, while geographically independent sites were used for quantitative and qualitative evaluation. All models used consistent preprocessing, augmentation, and evaluation protocols. On independent test data, ResNet50-DeepLabV3 achieved the highest Dice (0.7120) and Intersection over Union (IoU; 0.6267), followed by ResNet34 U Net (Dice 0.6868; IoU 0.5978). The hybrid ASPP Transformer achieved the highest pixel accuracy (0.8528) but lower Dice (0.6437) and IoU (0.5746). External qualitative evaluation further showed that DeepLabV3 produced more consistent segmentation across varying environmental conditions, image qualities, and benthic habitats. Overall, ResNet50-DeepLabV3, termed Kelp-O-Tron, provided the best balance of segmentation accuracy, robustness, and generalization. The dataset, annotation workflow, and comparative evaluation provide resources for advancing automated underwater habitat mapping and ecological monitoring.
Institute of Artificial Intelligence (TeleAI), China Telecom, China · University of Science and Technology of China, China · Northwestern Polytechnical University, China
Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, China · Columbia University, New York, United States · Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, United States +1