Organizations: School of Computer Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China · School of Software, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China · Shandong Inspur Intelligent Production Technology Co., Ltd, Jinan, 250101, China
Multi-Modal Anomaly Detection (MMAD) detects rare abnormal events from heterogeneous data sources and is increasingly used in safety- and reliability-critical applications such as industrial inspection and cybersecurity. Yet the literature is fragmented across domains and modality combinations, and existing surveys usually group methods by architecture rather than by how abnormality is defined and separated in multi-modal settings. We survey MMAD from an assumption-driven perspective. We formalize the problem, identify five intrinsic characteristics underlying its core challenges, and organize prior work into two complementary paradigms. The first, normality-assumption methods, models regularity via representation learning, cross-modal alignment, and knowledge enhancement. The second, anomaly-assumption methods, sharpens decision boundaries through coarse-grained, structural, and semantic anomaly injection. We also investigate how foundation models are reshaping MMAD through scalable pretraining, flexible cross-modal transfer, and emerging reasoning capabilities. Finally, we compile representative benchmarks and evaluation protocols across domains and highlight open problems and future directions for robust, adaptive, and interpretable MMAD systems.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1 : Conceptual roadmap of multi-modal anomaly detection. The figure illustrates the progression from the intrinsic nature of anomaly detection to multi-modality-induced challenges, the assumption-driven modeling paradigms, and the emerging future opportunities in MMAD.
Fig. 2 : Overview of normality-assumption methods across three groups: a) normal feature learning learns compact normal representations; b) cross-modal representation learning captures inter-modality relations to enrich the normal space; and c) domain knowledge enhancement leverages priors to refine the normal boundary. The right panel shows schematic or qualitative results adapted from Deep SVDD [ 126 ] , WinCLIP [ 64 ] , and VeXKD [ 68 ] .
Fig. 3 : Overview of abnormality-assumption methods that inject pseudo anomalies at three granularities: a) coarse-grained injection corrupts low-level statistics via within-modality perturbations or outlier exposure; b) structural injection breaks relational integrity by disturbing links or temporal order within/across modalities; and c) semantic injection synthesizes high-level logical inconsistencies using external knowledge or generative models. The right panel shows illustrative pseudo-anomaly visualizations adapted from CutPaste [ 78 ] , STEAL Net [ 5 ] , and AnomalyDiffusion [ 60 ] .
Method
Modality
Paradigm
FM
Key Mechanism & Intuition
Representative Benchmark
Performance (Metrics)
Image Anomaly Detection (Industrial, Medical & General Vision - Metrics: Image/Pixel-AUROC)
CutPaste [ 78 ]
I
AA (Coarse)
-
Heuristic patch self-augmentation
MVTec AD
95.2% (I-AUROC)
TaylorOE [ 41 ]
I
AA (Coarse)
-
Polynomial Taylor-expansion OE
CIFAR / ImageNet
99.3%+ (AUROC)
M3DM [ 154 ]
I+3D
NA (Alignment)
✓
Point-to-feature semantic alignment
MVTec 3D-AD
94.5% (I-AUROC)
WinCLIP [ 64 ]
I+L
AA (Semantic)
✓
Compositional prompt ensembling
MVTec AD / VisA (Zero-shot)
91.8% / 78.1% (AUROC)
PromptAD [ 85 ]
I+L
AA (Semantic)
✓
Knowledge-guided text descriptions
MVTec AD (Few-shot)
94.6% (I-AUROC) 95.9% (P-AUROC)
TABLE I : Quantitative performance and theoretical taxonomy of representative MMAD methods across diverse domains.
Dataset
Year
Modality
Target / Highlight
Scale / Size
Anomaly Ratio
Annotation Quality
Dynamics
Industrial & Manufacturing Inspection
MVTec AD [ 10 ]
2019
I
Structural defects (scratches, dents)
5,354 images
∼ 23%
Pixel-level mask
Static
MVTec LOCO [ 9 ]
2022
I
Structural + Logical (rule violations)
3,644 images
∼ 16%
Pixel-level mask
Static
MVTec 3D-AD [ 11 ]
2021
I+3D
Geometric shapes (holes, protrusions)
4,147 scans
∼ 23%
Pixel & Voxel-level
Static
Real3D-AD [ 90 ]
2023
High-res 3D
Largest high-precision 360 ∘ dataset
1,250 3D models
∼ 48%
Voxel-level mask
Static
VisA [ 192 ]
2022
I
Complex surfaces, multiple instances
10,821 images
∼ 11%
Pixel-level mask
Static
TABLE II : Summary of multi-modal and unimodal anomaly detection datasets across diverse application domains.
Anomaly detection aims to identify observations that deviate from expected behavior. Because anomalous events are inherently sparse, most frameworks are trained exclusively on normal data to learn a single reference model of normality. This implicitly assumes that normal behavior can be captured by a single, unconditional reference distribution. In practice, however, anomalies are often context-dependent: A specific observation may be normal under one operating condition, yet anomalous under another. As machine learning systems are deployed in dynamic and heterogeneous environments, these fixed-context assumptions introduce structural ambiguity, i.e., the inability to distinguish contextual variation from genuine abnormality under marginal modeling, leading to unstable performance and unreliable anomaly assessments. While modern sensing systems frequently collect multimodal data capturing complementary aspects of both system behavior and operating conditions, existing methods treat all data streams equally, without distinguishing contextual information from anomaly-relevant signals. As a result, abnormality is often evaluated without explicitly conditioning on operating conditions. We argue that multimodal anomaly detection should be reframed as a cross-modal contextual inference problem, in which modalities play asymmetric roles, separating context from observation, to define abnormality conditionally rather than relative to a single global reference. This perspective has implications for model design, evaluation protocols, and benchmark construction, and outline open research challenges toward robust, context-aware multimodal anomaly detection.
Kevin Wilkinghoff, Neelu Madan, Juan Miguel Valverde +6
Aalborg University, Denmark · Pioneer Centre for Artificial Intelligence, Denmark · Technical University of Denmark, Denmark +3
In the progress of industrial anomaly detection, general anomaly detection (GAD) is an emerging trend and also the ultimate goal. Unlike the conventional single- and multi-class AD, general AD aims to train a general AD model that can directly detect anomalies in diverse novel classes without any retraining or fine-tuning on the target data. Recently, Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown great promise in achieving general anomaly detection due to their revolutionary visual understanding and language reasoning capabilities. However, MLLM's general AD ability remains underexplored due to: (1) MLLMs are pretrained on amounts of data sourced from the Web, these data still have significant gaps with the data in AD scenarios. Moreover, the image-text pairs during pretraining are also not specifically for AD tasks. (2) The current mainstream AD datasets are image-based and not yet suitable for post-training MLLMs. To facilitate MLLM-based general AD research, we present MMR-AD, which is a comprehensive benchmark for both training and evaluating MLLM-based AD models. With MMR-AD, we reveal that the AD performance of current SOTA generalist MLLMs still falls far behind the industrial requirements. Based on MMR-AD, we also propose a baseline model, Anomaly-R1, which is a reasoning-based AD model that learns from the CoT data in MMR-AD and is further enhanced by reinforcement learning. Extensive experiments show that our Anomaly-R1 achieves remarkable improvements over generalist MLLMs in both anomaly detection and localization.
Xincheng Yao, Zefeng Qian, Chao Shi +2
School of Information Science and Electronic Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University · MoE Key Lab of Artificial Intelligence, AI Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Current advancements in Multimodal Anomaly Detection (MAD) are largely driven by enhancing multimodal fusion, particularly through the integration of RGB and Depth data for richer anomaly representation. However, less attention was devoted to analyzing the role of cross-modal fusion bias, a well-known challenge in multimodal learning, in MAD. This gap motivates a key question: can we overcome this bias to break the performance bottleneck of current work? In this paper, we first analyze the impact of cross-modal fusion bias in MAD via the Fisher Information Matrix. Then, grounded in these findings, we propose UCFB, a simple yet effective plug-and-play framework designed to mitigate cross-modal fusion bias in MAD. It achieves this by jointly employing Fisher-information-guided dynamic calibration to adjust modality-specific regularization weights and canonical similarity analysis to improve inter-modal interactions. Extensive experiments on the MVTec 3D-AD and Eyecandies datasets demonstrate that UCFB achieves consistent improvements in single-class, multi-class, and few-shot settings.
Kaifang Long, Lianbo Ma, Liming Liu +1
Northeastern University Shenyang, China · CATL Ningde, China