cs.LGAug 26, 2026

Two Dimensions Govern Agnostic Multiclass Transductive Learning

Authors: Pahan Dewasurendra

Organizations: Johns Hopkins University

Abstract

In transductive classification, an adversary fixes a labeled population, one label is hidden uniformly, and the learner sees all remaining labels. For binary classes, agnostic transductive and PAC learning have the same minimax rate. Whether this extends to multiclass learning was open, especially for unbounded label spaces where uniform convergence can fail. We resolve the question up to logarithmic factors. For every multiclass class H\mathcal H with DS dimension dDSd_{DS} and Natarajan dimension dNd_{\mathrm N}, the optimal agnostic transductive excess error satisfies Θ~(dDSn+dNn).\widetildeΘ\left(\frac{d_{DS}}{n}+\sqrt{\frac{d_{\mathrm N}}{n}}\right). The result holds for arbitrary label spaces. The two terms are both necessary. A DS pseudo-cube gives the realizable dDS/nd_{DS}/n obstruction, while a Natarajan cube with repeated points and fair labels gives the agnostic dN/n\sqrt{d_{\mathrm N}/n} obstruction. The upper bound uses a random-reservation principle. The learner deliberately ignores a constant fraction of the visible labels, which makes the true test point uniform in a large unseen block. We combine realizable compression, a label-space reduction, and inside-menu agnostic compression across this finite-population split. A new without-replacement multiplicative-weights lemma preserves the fast dDS/nd_{DS}/n term. Consequently, agnostic multiclass PAC and transductive learning obey the same two-dimension law up to logarithmic factors.

Explore similar work

May 28, 2026cs.LG

Universal Multiclass Transductive Online Learning

We consider the problem of universal transductive online classification with a possibly unbounded label space. This setting considers online learning, with the sequence of instances (without labels) known to the learner in advance. We say a concept class H\mathcal{H} is learnable if there is a learning algorithm A\mathcal{A}, such that for every realizable sequence, the number of mistakes made by A\mathcal{A} grows at most sublinearly with the number of predictions. We characterize the learnability of this setting and show that there are only two possible optimal rates for the learnable classes: either bounded or increasing logarithmically. We introduce a new combinatorial structure, called ``Level-Constrained-Littlestone-Littlestone (LCLL) tree'', which, along with the indifference property, characterizes the learnability. We also extend the learnability result to the agnostic case and the case where only the stochastic process that generates the instance sequence is known.
Aug 11, 2026cs.LG

Optimistic Rates for Multiclass PAC Learning

Worst-case multiclass bounds do not become smaller when the best classifier is already nearly correct: what is missing is an optimistic rate, a guarantee whose fluctuation scales with the oracle risk itself. For a class of Natarajan dimension dNd_N and Daniely-Shalev-Shwartz dimension dDSd_{DS}, the optimal excess risk is known at the two endpoints (dDS/nd_{DS}/n realizable, dN/n+dDS/n\sqrt{d_N/n}+d_{DS}/n agnostic [HMZ24, CEH+26, Pab26]) and open in between. We close the gap: at every fixed oracle risk L⋆L^\star, the optimal excess risk is Θ~(L⋆dN/n+dDS/n)\widetildeΘ(\sqrt{L^\star d_N/n}+d_{DS}/n), uniformly in the alphabet size, attained by a learner that knows neither L⋆L^\star nor the confidence level. The upper bound composes the cover-menu-compression architecture of [CEH+26], at the realizable rate of [Pab26], with a new comparator-facing relative compression theorem: a size-kk compression rule that empirically dominates a comparator hh has population risk at most L(h)+O(L(h)Γ+Γ)L(h)+O(\sqrt{L(h)Γ}+Γ) with Γ=(klog⁡n+log⁡(1/δ))/nΓ=(k\log n+\log(1/δ))/n, without stability; this transfers the comparison principle of the sharp binary theory [MQZ26] while discarding its Boolean-cube geometry, which does not lift to multiclass labels. The lower bound forces both terms using one class and one distribution at every fixed L⋆L^\star, by a pair-Assouad scheme calibrated to L⋆L^\star and a fiber argument on the pseudo-cubes underlying the Natarajan-versus-DS separation of [BCD+22]. Both theorems extend to list learning: against the best rr-tuple of hypotheses, the same architecture and the same two engines yield an optimistic rate and a lower bound of the same shape, forcing the fluctuation term that [Pab26] expected to be necessary against list comparators, and removing the factor rr from the known realizable list lower bound.
Mar 2, 2026cs.LG

Multiplicative Oracle Inequalities for Transductive Learning via Level-Set Aggregation

We revisit transductive learning where predictions are made with the set of all covariates known in advance. In the leave-one-out (LOO) setting, the prediction is made with labels of the remaining sample points and evaluated by the average error. In particular, we study multiplicative oracle inequalities for agnostic transductive LOO prediction for a variety of tasks, including classification with 0-1 loss, squared loss regression, density estimation, and logistic regression. Specifically, we introduce \emph{Median of Level-Set Aggregation} (MLSA), an aggregation procedure built on near-ERM level sets (i.e., empirical-risk level sets around the ERM). We prove a general multiplicative oracle inequality for the LOO error of the form LOOS(MLSA)  ≤  C(1nmin⁡h∈HLS(h)  +  log⁡∣H∣n),C>1,LOO_S(MLSA) \;\le\; C \left( \frac{1}{n} \min_{h\in H} L_S(h) \;+\; \frac{\log |H|}{n}\right), \qquad C>1, where HH is the hypothesis/function class. This inequality holds for hypothesis classes under a local level-set growth condition together with losses satisfying a mild monotonicity assumption. For classification with VC classes under the 00--11 loss, the log⁡∣H∣\log |H| factor can be improved to be dlog⁡nd\log n, where dd is the VC dimension, recovering Long (1998) up to a log⁡n\log n factor. For logistic regression with bounded covariates and parameters, the log⁡∣H∣\log |H| factor can be improved to be dlog⁡nd\log n up to problem-dependent factors, where dd is the ambient dimension.