LUTSeg: A Longitudinal Multi-Expert Dataset for Ulcer Tissue Segmentation
Authors: Karen Sanchez, Carlos Hinojosa, Albert A. Ávila, Andrea C. Riano-Rojas, Diego H. Romero, Jenny C. Páez, Martina Llinás, Bernard Ghanem
Organizations: King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Saudi Arabia · Subred Norte E.S.E, Hospital Simón Bolívar, Colombia · Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia
Quantifying wound tissue composition is essential for monitoring chronic ulcer progression and guiding treatment decisions. However, pixel-level annotations are costly, and multi-tissue wound datasets remain scarce, particularly for neglected diseases such as leprosy. We introduce LUTSeg, a longitudinal chronic ulcer dataset comprising 141 images from 39 patients with wound masks and five tissue categories annotated by five expert clinicians, including a multi-expert gold-standard subset for inter-rater agreement analysis. To establish an initial benchmark for LUTSeg, we further propose TiSage, a semi-supervised tissue segmentation framework that integrates multi-scale semantic priors from a frozen medical vision-language model within a teacher-student architecture. We evaluate TiSage on LUTSeg and DFUTissue, showing improvements over supervised and semi-supervised baselines in most low-label settings. Code & data: https://github.com/carlosh93/TiSage
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Samples of the LUTSeg dataset. First-visit image, its binary wound mask, and pixel-level segmentation into five tissue categories for each visit image.
Figure 2: (Left) ICC(3,1) for tissue proportion agreement across annotators. (Right) Pairwise Dice scores on 46 images annotated by 5 clinicians (gold-standard subset).
Figure 3: (A) Multi-scale semantic prior construction: coarse and fine SLIC superpixels are encoded with a frozen MedSigLIP encoder, classified, and fused in log space to produce a multi-scale prior q(x) . (B) EMA teacher predictions p(x) from weakly augmented images. (C) Pixel-adaptive fusion of teacher and prior based on teacher confidence, yielding calibrated pseudo-labels p~(x) .
DFUTissue
LUTSeg
Fixed
1/4
1/8
1/16
1/4
1/8
1/16
Method
mIoU
F1
mIoU
Dice
mIoU
Dice
mIoU
Dice
mIoU
Dice
mIoU
Dice
mIoU
Dice
Supervised methods
DeepLabV3+–R50
70.02
81.12
65.22
77.14
58.32
70.52
48.38
58.87
19.89
23.17
20.79
24.18
21.25
25.34
DINOv2–DPT
68.71
80.21
66.23
78.03
64.68
76.57
52.83
65.02
28.38
35.19
20.47
23.55
24.47
30.15
Semi-supervised methods
Table 1: Comparison of supervised and semi-supervised segmentation methods. In DFUTissue, Fixed denotes the official predefined SSL split. Supervised methods use only the labeled portion of each split, whereas semi-supervised methods additionally use the corresponding unlabeled images. DeepLabV3+ uses an ImageNet-pretrained ResNet-50 encoder; DINOv2-DPT and all SSL methods use DINOv2-Base. For LUTSeg, the fully supervised references using all 111 labeled training images are 31.37/39.19 mIoU/Dice for DINOv2–DPT and 22.06/25.61 for DeepLabV3+.
Method
DFUTissue
LUTSeg
Bg
Fibrin
Gran.
Callus
mIoU
Bg
Epi
Slough
Gran.
Necr.
Other
mIoU
UniMatch-V2
88.3
47.3
86.9
57.2
69.94
94.8
25.4
5.6
39.7
0.0
0.0
27.60
TiSage (Ours)
88.3
57.6
86.9
56.6
72.36
95.7
26.5
15.4
52.4
0.1
0.0
31.70
Table 2: Per-class IoU (%) results on the DFUTissue and LUTSeg for 1/8 label regime.
Prior setup
DFUTissue
LUTSeg
Pixel Acc (%)
mIoU (%)
Pixel Acc (%)
mIoU (%)
Zero-shot (single-scale SLIC)
76.24
34.70
67.94
16.39
Classifier (single-scale SLIC)
79.40
45.67
80.06
24.02
Classifier (coarse only)
74.71
44.70
77.48
23.38
Classifier (fine only)
81.55
48.05
81.00
25.44
Classifier (fused)
80.92
52.11
81.77
26.28
Table 3: MedSigLIP prior-only performance on DFUTissue and LUTSeg on val split.
Figure 4: Qualitative comparison of (a) Ground Truth, (b) UniMatch-V2, and (c) TiSage results for two random samples from the LUTSeg proposed dataset.
Medical image segmentation delineates organs, lesions, and other structures in scans to support measurement, diagnosis, treatment planning, and research.
Chronic wounds such as diabetic foot ulcers and pressure injuries require accurate tissue-level assessment to guide treatment planning and monitor healing progression. While deep learning methods have advanced automated wound analysis, most existing approaches focus on binary segmentation and inadequately model heterogeneous tissue composition due to high intra-class variability and limited annotated data. Multi-class wound tissue segmentation, therefore, remains a challenging and clinically relevant problem. We propose WoundFormer, a transformer-based framework that enhances hierarchical spatial feature fusion for multi-class wound tissue segmentation. Specifically, we replace the standard SegFormer decoder with a spatially-preserving multi-scale aggregation head that maintains feature topology during cross-scale integration and strengthens contextual interactions through convolutional fusion. This design improves boundary localization and discrimination between visually similar tissue categories while preserving transformer efficiency. We evaluate WoundFormer on the WoundTissueSeg dataset (147 images, six tissue classes) and a second benchmark (DFUTissue dataset). The proposed method achieves an overall Dice score of 81.9%, outperforming strong CNN- and transformer-based baselines by up to 4.3 Dice points on the WoundTissueSeg benchmark, with consistent improvements across minority tissue classes. These results indicate that explicit modeling of hierarchical spatial interactions enhances transformer representations for heterogeneous wound tissue segmentation and supports more reliable quantitative wound assessment.
Muhammad Ashad Kabir, Rabin Dulal
School of Computing, Mathematics and Engineering, Charles Sturt University, NSW, Australia
Accurate semantic segmentation of foot ulcers is essential for automated wound monitoring, yet boundary delineation remains challenging due to tissue heterogeneity and poor contrast with surrounding skin. To overcome the limitations of standard intensity-based networks, we present LSS-LTCNet:an ante-hoc explainable framework synergizing deterministic structural priors with continuous-time neural dynamics. Our architecture departs from traditional black-box models by employing a Local Self-Similarity (LSS) mechanism that extracts dense, illumination-invariant texture descriptors to explicitly disentangle necrotic tissue from background artifacts. To enforce topological precision, we introduce a Liquid Time-Constant (LTC) refinement module that treats boundary evolution as an ODEgoverned dynamic system, iteratively refining masks over continuous time-steps. Comprehensive evaluation on the MICCAI FUSeg dataset demonstrates that LSS-LTCNet achieves state-of-the-art boundary alignment, securing a peak Dice score of 86.96% and an exceptional 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance (HD95) of 8.91 pixels. Requiring merely 25.70M parameters, the model significantly outperforms heavier U-Net and transformer baselines in efficiency. By providing inherent visual audit trails alongside high-fidelity predictions, LSS-LTCNet offers a robust and transparent solution for computer-aided diagnosis in mobile healthcare (mHealth) settings.
Chronic wound management affects over 8.2 million patients in the United States and imposes substantial clinical and economic burden. Clinical wound assessment commonly involves three coupled tasks: identifying wound type, delineating wound boundaries, and localizing the wound region for measurement and monitoring. Despite this clinical coupling, existing machine learning approaches typically address wound classification, segmentation, and localization using separate models. We present WILLIE, a unified framework and benchmark for wound classification, segmentation and localization that enables systematic evaluation of multi-task wound analysis under a common protocol. WILLIE harmonizes three public wound datasets into a shared benchmark and compares unified models across three scaling configurations against 10 single-task baselines. The best model achieves 91.88% classification accuracy, 91.41% Dice, and 96.23% [email protected] while producing all three outputs in a single forward pass. Beyond aggregate performance, our results show that segmentation-derived localization outperforms dedicated detection baselines in this benchmark, suggesting that box-based localization may be unnecessary for spatially coherent wound targets. Our findings highlight that effective multi-task learning in healthcare imaging depends not only on shared representations, but also on task formulation, compatibility, and benchmark design.
Department of Computer Science University of Houston Houston, Texas, USA · Houston Methodist Academic Institute Houston Methodist Hospital System Houston, Texas, USA