We investigate whether AI-generated impulsive sounds can be distinguished from real ones through group delay analysis. Our central finding is that AI-generated impulsive sounds show near-identical onset-region group-delay distributions but exhibit measurably different group-delay behavior in the late decay region: decay-region KL divergence reaches 0.322 compared to near-zero onset divergence (0.022). Cross-band GD variability achieves single-feature AUC~=0.720, and a Random Forest (RF) over nine decay-region features reaches AUC=0.884 under sample-disjoint evaluation. A group delay map used as a standalone 2D input to CNN classifiers achieves 90--94% accuracy, demonstrating that group delay carries substantial discriminative information. Under generator hold-out, CNN and transformer classifiers show highly variable AUC (0.457--0.918). The group delay RF achieves the highest average hold-out accuracy among the evaluated methods (66.7%) and avoids extreme below-random collapse, although its average AUC (0.731) is lower than CNN avg (0.762) and AST (0.772). Parameter sensitivity analysis across 27 STFT configurations confirms that the RF AUC remains stable (0.700--0.847, std=~0.035). These results suggest that decay-region group delay can serve as a physically interpretable forensic cue that complements magnitude-based classifiers, while broader validation remains necessary.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Overall framework for decay-region group delay forensic analysis. The pipeline processes a 3-second audio clip through STFT and phase unwrapping to extract a mel-compressed group delay map Gˉ , which feeds three analysis branches: (A) decay-region scalar features with Random Forest classification, (B) GD-map-based CNN/AST detection, and (C) magnitude comparison. All branches are evaluated under sample-disjoint split, generator hold-out, real-source hold-out, and STFT sensitivity protocols.
Class
Source
Orig.
Final
×
Real
FSD50K
1,122
3,750
3.3
Real
SESA
585
3,750
6.4
Fake
ElevenLabs
1,119
2,500
2.2
Fake
Stable Audio
1,000
2,500
2.5
Fake
AudioLDM2
1,000
2,500
2.5
TABLE I: Dataset construction.
Condition
AUC
Acc (%)
FSD50K → SESA (hold-out)
0.849
76.47
SESA → FSD50K (hold-out)
0.857
77.00
Mixed → Mixed (reference)
0.878
79.33
TABLE II: Real-source hold-out: GD RF performance under real-source shift.
Fig. 2: Group delay CDF: onset region (left, KL = 0.022) shows near-identical real/fake distributions, while the decay region (right, KL = 0.322) reveals measurably different distributions. Shaded area indicates the gap between real and fake CDFs.
Region / Band
KL
Overall
0.2426
Low freq (0–500 Hz)
0.2339
Mid freq (500–2000 Hz)
0.2417
High freq (2000–8000 Hz)
0.2437
Onset (first 30%)
0.022
Decay (last 50%)
0.322
TABLE III: KL divergence: real vs. fake.
Feature
Cohen’s d
Cliff’s δ
AUC
Decay variance
0.588
0.261
0.651
Decay entropy
0.502
0.010
0.521
Decay abs. mean
0.578
0.204
0.628
Decay/onset var. ratio
0.036
0.096
0.573
Decay → onset KL
0.482
0.114
0.570
Decay → onset shift
0.084
0.102
0.530
TABLE IV: Decay-region scalar features ( N=15,000 , all p<0.001 ).
Fig. 3: Generator-wise group delay analysis ( ∗∗∗p<0.001 , ∗p<0.05 , ns = not significant vs. real). The most pronounced separation appears in Decay-to-Onset KL (top-right), where Stable Audio and AudioLDM2 differ significantly ( p<0.001 ) while ElevenLabs shows a weaker, non-significant trend. The compact fake distributions may partly reflect generator-specific homogeneity; these results are interpreted as evidence of a candidate forensic cue rather than a source-independent detector.
TABLE VII: Generator hold-out: Acc (%) and AUC. Bold : best Acc or best AUC per hold-out condition. CNN avg denotes the average over ResNet50, EfficientNet-B2, and CNN14; AST is reported separately as a transformer-based model.
Fig. 4: Phase-Flow CRNN temporal attention (note: y-axis scales differ across panels). Real samples (a,b) show relatively diffuse or transient attention patterns, whereas fake samples (c,d) exhibit concentrated attention in the late decay region. This pattern is consistent with the decay-region group delay findings.