Explainable Diabetic Retinopathy Classification Using Vision Foundation Models

The quality of diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening relies on the ability to correctly grade severity; however, many deep-learning (DL) classifiers cannot be easily interpreted in the clinical context. This study presents a methodology that combines strong discriminative models with multimodal explanations, converting retinal pixels into clinically interpretable outputs. Using the APTOS 2019 benchmark, we evaluated six representative CNN- and transformer-based backbones under a controlled protocol with stratified five-fold cross-validation. We then compared ensembling strategies (hard voting, weighted soft voting, stacking) and investigated a hybrid class-level fusion variant to exploit grade-specific advantages. For interpretability, we produced Grad-CAM++ visual attribution maps and short textual rationales using vision-language models (VLMs) conditioned on the fundus image and classifier outputs under conservative prompting constraints. Modern CNN backbones (ResNet-50 and ConvNeXt-Tiny) provided the strongest single-model baselines, with cross-validated QWK up to 0.919 and 0.914, respectively. Ensembling improved ordinal agreement, and weighted soft voting was the most consistent across folds (QWK 0.934 +/- 0.017). Hybrid class-level fusion was competitive but did not yield a statistically reliable improvement over standard fusion in paired fold comparisons (Holm-adjusted p >= 1.000). For explanation quality, Grad-CAM++ offered plausible but coarse localization, and VLM rationales were generally grade-consistent. Quantitatively, VLM variants showed a trade-off between clinical completeness and template-level semantic similarity (coverage 0.700 vs. BERTScore 0.072), while image-text alignment was comparable (CLIPScore approximately 0.34).

Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) is an aggressive retinal disease and a leading cause of global blindness, yet its clinical management is currently hindered by the black-box nature of diagnostic AI. While deep learning models achieve high classification accuracy, there is a critical lack of explainability methods capable of detailing the exact anatomical landmarks and lesion distributions that lead to a clinical decision for DR. Therefore, we propose HSQ-VLM, a novel quadrant segmentation pipeline on fundus images that utilizes a Landmark-Anchored Cartesian Cross-Attention mechanism to unify visual feature extraction with structured clinical reasoning. Unlike traditional methods that rely on arbitrary image partitioning, our pipeline implements 4-quadrant Topological Latent Partitioning (TLP) to dynamically align retinal features with a fovea-centered coordinate system. This allows the Vision-Language Model to generate natural language reports that quantify pathology with anatomical precision. On a dataset of 3,500 high-resolution fundus images, this innovative methodology achieved a lesion detection sensitivity of 99.6% for hemorrhages and 96.4% for microaneurysms, while demonstrating a significant reduction in boundary-ambiguity errors compared to standard segmentation baselines.

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of preventable blindness, and automated fundus image grading can play an important role in large-scale screening. In this work, we investigate three CLIP-based approaches for five-class DR severity grading: (1) a zero-shot baseline using prompt engineering, (2) a hybrid FCN-CLIP model augmented with CBAM attention, and (3) a ranking-aware prompting model that encodes the ordinal structure of DR progression. We train and evaluate on a combined dataset of APTOS 2019 and Messidor-2 (n=5,406), addressing class imbalance through resampling and class-specific optimal thresholding. Our experiments show that the ranking-aware model achieves the highest overall accuracy (93.42%, AUROC 0.9845) and strong recall on clinically critical severe cases, while the hybrid FCN-CLIP model (92.49%, AUROC 0.99) excels at detecting proliferative DR. Both substantially outperform the zero-shot baseline (55.17%, AUROC 0.75). We analyze the complementary strengths of each approach and discuss their practical implications for screening contexts.