Abstract4D: A Large-Scale Dataset and Framework for Understanding the Visual Language of Abstract Art

Recent vision-language models demonstrate impressive general visual understanding, yet their art interpretation remains shallow: they describe surface content but struggle with formal analysis, grounded historical interpretation, or affective characterization. We argue this is not only a model but also a dataset limitation. Existing art datasets are single perspective resources, where no dataset provides narrative, formal, emotional, and historical perspectives simultaneously for the same artworks. We introduce MMArt, a large-scale dataset of 74,234 WikiArt paintings, each annotated with four independently annotated perspectives plus a harmonized unified caption, produced by specialized vision-language models or human annotation and validated through complementary quality evaluations. Two complementarity analyses establish that perspectives encode genuinely distinct information. A generative analysis shows that formal analysis descriptions best preserve compositional style, and historical descriptions carry strong affective signal in reconstructed images. A discriminative retrieval analysis reveals task-asymmetry: narrative descriptions drive retrieval (R@1 = 44.0%), while formal descriptions, strongest for reconstruction, are nearly nondiscriminative at retrieval scale (R@1 = 7.8%). Leave-one-out analysis further confirms that historical descriptions are the least replaceable perspective across both tasks. Together, the two analyses establish that no single perspective suffices for all tasks, directly motivating MMArt multi-perspective design. The dataset, code, and additional information are available at https://shuaiwang97.github.io/MMArt/.

Instance-level artwork recognition requires matching a handheld visitor photograph to a specific work in a large museum collection. This is challenging because painting datasets typically provide clean catalog images for training, while test queries are captured under oblique viewpoints, gallery lighting, reflections, frames, and other scene-level variations. We present SynGallery, a synthetic gallery dataset for artwork retrieval that addresses this gap without collecting additional real photographs. Starting from catalog images of real paintings, we place each artwork into a procedurally generated 3D gallery scene and render it from multiple viewpoints under varied geometric and appearance conditions, while preserving the exact identity of the original work. The resulting dataset contains 24,490 rendered views of 4,898 paintings from the Met benchmark. We show that these synthetic views provide a stronger training signal than the corresponding studio photographs. At the same number of training data points, training only on SynGallery improves art painting recognition from 67.18 to 73.47 GAP$^-$. When added to the full Met training set, SynGallery improves the published benchmark protocol from 35.97 to 38.48 GAP. Ablation experiments show that the gain comes primarily from geometric viewpoint variation rather than photographic realism: blur, sensor noise, and image compression consistently reduce performance.

Analyzing digitized artworks requires both visual interpretation and deep artistic, contextual, and historical knowledge. We introduce ArtSeek, a multimodal framework for art analysis that combines multimodal large language models with retrieval-augmented generation. Unlike prior work, our pipeline relies only on image input, so it applies to artworks without links to Wikidata or Wikipedia, common in most digitized collections. ArtSeek integrates three components: a late-interaction multimodal retrieval module, a contrastive multitask network predicting artist, genre, style, media, and tags, and an agentic reasoning strategy enabled through in-context examples. Central to this approach is WikiFragments, a dataset of image-text fragments extracted from the entire English Wikipedia to support knowledge-grounded multimodal reasoning. Our multimodal query encoding raises retrieval NDCG@5 from 33.9 to 44.9 over encoding the full image-text query, and fixed-budget token pooling keeps late-interaction search practical over millions of fragments at under 7% of the cost of full multi-vector retrieval. ArtSeek sets a new state of the art in artwork attribute classification, with +8.4% F1 in style classification over GraphCLIP, and gains +7.1 BLEU@1 on ArtPedia captioning. On five knowledge-grounded question answering benchmarks graded by an LLM judge from a different model family, retrieval helps where the answer is documented in our index or lies inside the classifier's label space (+0.19 mean correctness on two of them) and is neutral where it is not; what separates the two regimes is how much of a benchmark our knowledge base covers. The gain transfers to two non-Qwen backbones (+0.22 to +0.28). A blind human study and a qualitative analysis of successes and failures corroborate this picture and expose where retrieval still misleads. Data and code: https://cilab.di.uniba.it/artseek/