Touchpoint selection in conversion attribution, namely identifying meaningful touchpoints contributing to conversions, is essential for e-commerce recommendation and online advertising. Current selection methods rely heavily on collaborative-filtering-based heuristics, which fail to align with user-perceived semantic intent. Through human annotation, we reveal a significant semantic gap: many implicitly-related, semantically relevant touchpoints remain undetected by existing rules. Therefore, we systematically evaluate the capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) in identifying these hidden associations. Our evaluation shows that while LLMs effectively uncover a substantial portion of implicitly-related touchpoints, significant room for improvement remains in their selection performance. Furthermore, we analyze the impact of different prompting strategies and foundation model choices on identification performance, providing valuable insights into their reasoning patterns and effectiveness. These insights offer a new roadmap for transitioning conversion attribution from mechanical rule-matching to human-aligned semantic reasoning. Moreover, we leverage the LLM-attributed conversion labels for enhancing industrial CVR model training and achieve significant offline performance gains, showing the potential of LLMs in conversion attribution.
Figures & tables
Figure 1. Touchpoint selection and weight allocation in conversion attribution. Overview of conversion attribution with touchpoint selection followed by weight allocation.
Figure 2. Schematic annotation interface for constructing the SILVA benchmark. A schematic annotation interface showing a user profile, a candidate touchpoint, the final conversion, and label choices for irrelevant, explicit, and implicit relevance.
Model
Listwise Prompting
Pairwise Prompting
Exp.
Imp.
Overall
Exp.
Imp.
Overall
P
R
F1
P
R
F1
F1
P
R
F1
P
R
F1
F1
Closed-source large models
GPT-5.5
0.9180
0.9418
0.9070
0.5161
0.4763
0.4732
0.6901
0.8747
0.9751
0.8968
0.6454
0.5567
0.5426
0.7197
Gemini-3.1-Pro
0.9312
0.9275
0.9053
0.5612
0.5201
0.5077
0.7065
0.8953
0.9686
0.9095
0.6246
0.5398
0.5293
0.7194
Claude-Opus-4.7
0.9151
0.9374
0.9002
0.4698
0.4664
0.4491
0.6747
0.9261
0.9147
0.8975
0.5707
0.6210
0.4979
0.6977
Table 1. Main results of LLM-based touchpoint selection on SILVA. Exp. and Imp. denote explicit and implicit touchpoints. Shaded columns mark F1 metrics, with bold and underline indicating the best and second-best values in each F1 column.
Figure 3. Schematic comparison of pairwise and listwise prompting protocols for LLM-based touchpoint selection. A schematic comparison of pairwise and listwise prompting protocols, showing the inputs, LLM calls, output labels, and shared selection criteria.
Figure 4. The performance gap between pairwise and listwise prompting narrows when the listwise overall F1 is higher. A scatter plot showing listwise Overall F1 on the horizontal axis and pairwise gain over listwise prompting on the vertical axis for the evaluated LLMs.
Prompt
Model
Δ Exp.
Δ Imp.
Δ Overall
Listwise
GPT-5.5
+0.0165
+0.0296
+0.0231
Gemini-3.1-Pro
+0.0089
+0.0089
+0.0089
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
+0.0036
+0.0016
+0.0026
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
-0.0012
+0.0063
+0.0025
Qwen3.5-27B
+0.0826
+0.0239
+0.0533
Qwen3.5-30B-A3B
+0.0452
+0.0094
+0.0274
Table 2. Ablation of thinking mode for LLM-based touchpoint selection. We report the F1 gain of think over nothink .
Method
In-Shop
Heuristic
LLM-Based
Δ GAUC(pp)
Base ( 4 )
✓
✗
✗
-
CABB ( 23 )
✓
✓
✗
+0.20
LOTUS (Ours)
✓
✓
✓
+0.35
Table 3. Comparison of different touchpoint selection methods for CVR prediction. Our LLM-based selection captures incremental semantic signals beyond traditional heuristics.
Query-product relevance prediction is fundamental to e-commerce search and has become even more critical in the era of AI-powered shopping, where semantic understanding and complex reasoning directly shape the user experience and business conversion. Large Language Models (LLMs) enable generative, reasoning-based approaches, typically aligned via supervised fine-tuning (SFT) or preference optimization methods like Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). However, the increasing complexity of business rules and user queries exposes the inability of existing methods to endow models with robust reasoning capacity for long-tail and challenging cases. Efforts to address this via reinforcement learning strategies like Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) often suffer from sparse terminal rewards, offering insufficient guidance for multi-step reasoning and slowing convergence. To address these challenges, we propose TaoSR-AGRL, an Adaptive Guided Reinforcement Learning framework for LLM-based relevance prediction in Taobao Search Relevance. TaoSR-AGRL introduces two key innovations: (1) Rule-aware Reward Shaping, which decomposes the final relevance judgment into dense, structured rewards aligned with domain-specific relevance criteria; and (2) Adaptive Guided Replay, which identifies low-accuracy rollouts during training and injects targeted ground-truth guidance to steer the policy away from stagnant, rule-violating reasoning patterns toward compliant trajectories. TaoSR-AGRL was evaluated on large-scale real-world datasets and through online side-by-side human evaluations on Taobao Search. It consistently outperforms DPO and standard GRPO baselines in offline experiments, improving relevance accuracy, rule adherence, and training stability. The model trained with TaoSR-AGRL has been successfully deployed in the main search scenario on Taobao, serving hundreds of millions of users.
Jianhui Yang, Yiming Jin, Pengkun Jiao +6
Tsinghua University Beijing, China · Taobao & Tmall Group of Alibaba Beijing, China · Taobao & Tmall Group of Alibaba Hangzhou, China +1
The generative nature of Large Language Models (LLMs) is reflected in the conditional probabilities they compute to sample each response token given the previous tokens. These probabilities encode the distributional structure that the model learns in training and exploits in inference. In this work, we use these probabilities to situate LLMs within the mathematical theory of stochastic processes. We use this framework to design a model-agnostic probabilistic token attribution measure, using Bayes rule to invert the next-token log-probabilities so as to capture the models internal representation of the distribution over token sequences. The representation is independent of the models computational structure. This representation yields the conditional probability of the response given the prompt, and of the response given the prompt with a token marginalized away. Our attribution score is the log of the ratio of these probabilities. We further compute the entropies of a single prompts token distributions, conditioned on the remaining context. The interplay between entropy and attribution score sheds light on LLM behavior. We evaluate 8 models across 7 prompts and investigate anomalies, token sensitivity, response stability, model stability, and training convergence, thereby improving interpretability and guiding users to focus on uncertain or unstable parts of the generation.
Shilpika Shilpika, Carlo Graziani, Bethany Lusch +2
Argonne Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory Lemont, IL, USA · Mathematics and Computer Science Division Argonne National Laboratory Lemont, IL, USA · Department of Computer Science University of Illinois Chicago Chicago, IL, USA
Conversational Recommender Systems (CRS) powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) enable users to articulate explicit and dynamic preferences, overcoming the limitations of fixed templates. However, despite their superior semantic proficiency, LLMs have not yet achieved corresponding improvements in recommendation accuracy. This discrepancy arises from a fundamental representation gap: while LLMs operate within a semantic space, they lack the behavioral grounding needed to encode user behavioral patterns, such as item co-occurrences, which are crucial for accurate recommendations. To address this, we propose a model-agnostic Variational EM Framework for Bridging Semantics and Behavior in LLM-based Conversational Recommendation (LatentCRS). Based on the observation that dialogue and interactions reflect the same latent intent, LatentCRS uses a variational expectation-maximization (EM) procedure, where user intent connects semantic representations with behavioral patterns. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that LatentCRS effectively bridges the representation gap and outperforms baselines.