Organizations: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc., USA · Qualcomm Auto Ltd Sweden Filial, Sweden · Qualcomm India Private Limited, India · Arriver System Software S.r.l., Romania
Behavior-cloned Vision-Language-Action (VLA) driving policies struggle with rare rule-governed maneuvers at signalized intersections. Braking and launching examples contribute little to averaged trajectory loss, while fused representations lack explicit supervision for the governing traffic-light and stop-line state. We present RedLight-VLA, a training objective that uses expert futures and automatically generated perception targets without additional manual rule annotation. First, trajectory-derived behavioral reweighting (BR) emphasizes rare deceleration and acceleration using rotation-invariant longitudinal dynamics and a scale-preserving reduction that exactly recovers the baseline when disabled. Second, parallel auxiliary (AUX) heads ground traffic-light and stop-line state in continuous post-fusion rule tokens, without autoregressive language generation or changes to the trajectory decoder. We evaluate on a curated set of 20 s sequences with a 5 s prediction horizon. Controlled variants share the same backbone, training data, decoder, and evaluation population. Against an otherwise identical VLA baseline, RedLight-VLA reduces red-light stop-line overshoot from 7.3% to6.8%, reduces stop-line velocity error by 12.7%, and improves 3 s trafficlight-sliced ADE/FDE from 0.274/0.964 m to 0.247/0.897 m. Green-light false stops increase from 3.2% to 3.9%; however, combining BR with AUX supervision mitigates the larger increase observed for AUX alone (4.0%). The combined model also improves non-traffic-light ADE/FDE from 0.268/0.956 m to 0.241/0.876 m and outperforms either mechanism alone on all four sliced displacement measures.
Figures & tables
Split
Sequences
Frames
Any TL (raw)
Ego-rel. TL (raw)
Resolved TL (GT)
Stop-line (GT)
Train
235,985
1,651,895
40.66% ( 671 K)
38.34% ( 633 K)
25.70% ( 425 K)
10.10% ( 167 K)
Val
16,318
114,226
40.62% ( 46,395 )
38.26% ( 43,703 )
25.59% ( 29,236 )
10.01% ( 11,429 )
Test
16,404
114,828
40.69% ( 46,727 )
38.43% ( 44,128 )
25.81% ( 29,640 )
10.19% ( 11,696 )
Table 1: Dataset scale and split composition. Percentages are relative to all frames in each split; parentheses report frame counts, with “K” denoting thousands for the training split. “Resolved TL” is the red/green target used by the auxiliary task, and “Stop-line” is the capped target used by the stop-line head.
Table 2Table 3
TL slice
non-TL slice
Scenario
Base
Full
Δ Full
Base
Full
Δ Full
Stationary
0.3361
0.3377
+0.0016
0.4300
0.3645
-0.0655
Low speed
0.5942
0.5550
-0.0392
0.8185
0.7234
-0.0951
Medium speed
0.8302
0.7318
-0.0984
0.7861
0.6821
-0.1040
High speed
0.7154
0.6667
-0.0487
0.5664
0.5356
-0.0308
Low curvature
0.6397
0.5825
-0.0572
0.6131
0.5598
-0.0533
Table 4: Scenario-bucketed ADE at 5 s on the curated validation extract (m, ↓ ). The TL slice contains frames with an ego-relevant traffic light or stop line; the non-TL slice contains the remaining eligible frames. Full has lower point-estimate ADE than Base in 19 of 20 slice–scenario cells.
Stop for red
Red → green
Figure 4: Qualitative red-to-green sequence. Predictions (green) stop at red (top) and accelerate after green (bottom), compared with reference futures (blue). Insets show speed and TLR GT/PRED; this example is illustrative, not causal evidence.
Autonomous driving develops vehicles that perceive road scenes, predict interactions, and plan and control safe movement with limited or no human input.
Traffic signal control (TSC) is essential for improving urban mobility and reducing congestion. Although roadside cameras are widely deployed at signalized intersections and provide rich visual observations of evolving traffic, existing TSC methods typically rely on manually engineered traffic states or separate perception modules, creating a gap between physical observations and control decisions. We present VLALight, the first vision-language-action (VLA) model for end-to-end traffic signal control from multi-view roadside videos. VLALight directly maps visual observations to coordinated signal actions through multi-target spatiotemporal traffic reasoning and topology-aware cooperative perception across intersections. To establish this capability, we develop a two-stage supervised cold-start training strategy for visual traffic understanding and signal decision-making, followed by cooperative agentic reinforcement learning that jointly optimizes local control and network-wide traffic efficiency. Furthermore, VLALight introduces adaptive fast and slow reasoning modes, enabling the policy to allocate deeper reasoning only when additional deliberation provides sufficient control benefits. Through balanced mode-aware rollouts and relative advantage optimization, VLALight learns to trade off decision quality and inference cost. Extensive experiments on seven real-world traffic-flow datasets across three urban networks demonstrate that VLALight consistently outperforms transportation-based, RL-based, and LLM/VLM-based baselines. Ablation studies validate the effectiveness of cooperative perception, network-level optimization, and adaptive reasoning. These results demonstrate the potential of VLA models for real-world physical traffic control. Our project is available at https://github.com/usail-hkust/VLALight.git.
Pan Zhang, Siqi Lai, Kemu Dong +1
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) · Dalian University of Technology
Traffic signal control (TSC) is essential for mitigating urban congestion. Recent advances in vision-language models (VLMs) enable richer interpretation of intersection scenes, opening new opportunities for visual-context-aware TSC. However, the loose coupling and repeated information conversion between modules can lead to the loss of fine-grained visual details, while sequential inference introduces substantial latency. To address these limitations, we propose VLALight, a lightweight end-to-end vision-language-action framework that directly maps intersection observations and signal-phase information to discrete signal actions. To handle the multi-view nature of TSC, VLALight combines multiple directional camera views into a unified visual input and uses textual instructions to establish their correspondence with traffic movements and signal phases. This design enables direct action prediction with a compact 0.5 B-parameter model, without intermediate image-to-text descriptions or handcrafted traffic-state representations. Experiments show that VLALight delivers the best emergency-vehicle service of all compared methods, reducing pooled emergency waiting time by 21.1% over the cascaded VLMLight while running in real time on local hardware and generalizing to unseen intersection topologies and traffic-flow patterns.
Kemou Jiang, Maonan Wang, Xingchen Zou +6
School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China · The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, China · The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China +2
Vision-language-action (VLA) driving models couple a reasoning stage with a diffusion-based trajectory decoder, but do not give a direct way to redirect attention toward safety-critical actors at inference time without retraining. We studied a bounded additive pre-softmax attention bias on the visual tokens of detector localized traffic actors on Alpamayo-R1's Qwen3-VL backbone. It is applied as a fail open forward pre-hook with no weight changes. On 50 lane-change scenarios from the Physical AI World Model Synthetic dataset. The trajectory decoder shows a monotonic dose response in the bias magnitude, separate from a paired zero bias control at every tested magnitude. It reaches ≈17,cm mean displacement with lateral shifts up to ∼140\ cm at the clamp. A layer ablation places the action-relevant signal in late layers, where the effect increases with the number of hooked layers (2.0cm for the first 8 layers; 67.6cm for all 36). A per call injection audit explains why the Chain-of-Causation text never changes. The mask based bias never reaches the reasoning pathway in this serving stack, so the invariance is verified exposure, not robustness. Steered trajectories tend to shift toward the attended actor, suggesting the bias governs where the model looks rather than encoding a target behavior.
Darshan Nagendra Prasad, Lars Ullrich, Knut Graichen