math.HOAug 29, 2026

Explanations, Prompts, and Formalizations: Arguments for New Norms in LLM-Enabled Mathematical Research

Authors: Axel Boldt

Abstract

As several mathematical conjectures have recently been settled using large language models (LLMs), the mathematical community has formulated norms and recommendations regarding the publishing of such results. These norms do not cover the disclosure of the prompts and precise software setup used to obtain those results, nor do they require that results be formalized in a manner that allows for machine verification. I argue that both of these are essential. In addition, since LLM-obtained results may be hard to understand, human authors have the responsibility to invent intuitive explanations.

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. LemmaBench: A Live, Research-Level Benchmark to Evaluate LLM Capabilities in Mathematics

    Feb 27, 2026Antoine Peyronnet, Fabian Gloeckle, Amaury HayatMathematical Reasoning BenchmarksAutomated Theorem Proving

  2. Evaluation of LLMs for Mathematical Formalization in Lean

    Jun 4, 2026Tyson Klingner, Drew Bladek, Escher Crawford +6LLM EvaluationLean Theorem Proving

  3. Magenta: Closing the Loop Between Mathematical Reasoning and Lean Verification

    Sep 10, 2026Joshua Ong Jun Leang, Haonan Li, Zheng Zhao +6Automated Theorem ProvingAgentic Reasoning