Knowledge distillation trains a small student model to reproduce the outputs of a large teacher model, and its progress is typically monitored through the teacher--student discrepancy. The quantity of ultimate interest, however, is the student's error with respect to the true task. We study the relation between these two objectives in a minimal three-party model, a true teacher (generative model), a teacher, and a student, all soft committee machines, in which the true teacher contains a shared latent factor that the teacher cannot represent, with mismatch strength controlled by a single scalar \dmiss. Within an order-parameter description of online distillation, and exploiting closed-form (arcsine-type) expressions for all errors under error-function activations, we prove that the learning dynamics and the distillation error \Ets are exactly invariant to \dmiss, whereas the true error \Etzs and the gap Δ=\Etzs−\Ets are strictly increasing in \dmiss, with a rate that is amplified linearly by the complexity M0 of the true teacher. Numerical phase diagrams over the plane spanned by true-teacher complexity and student capacity confirm the predicted deformation: the contours of \Ets do not move while the landscape of \Etzs rises systematically, and a teacher-miss regime, where mimicry succeeds but the task fails, expands with \dmiss. The results give a quantitative warning against evaluating distillation solely through teacher-mimicry metrics and identify the gap Δ as a minimal diagnostic for distinguishing teacher-miss from capacity-limited failure.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Separation of the error landscapes under the mismatch strength δmiss . The background heat map shows the true error Et0s (color scale shared across panels); the solid contours show the distillation error Ets . Increasing δmiss leaves the Ets contours unchanged (Theorem 6 (i)) while the Et0s landscape rises systematically (Theorem 6 (ii)). Horizontal axis: student capacity Ktot ; vertical axis: true-teacher complexity M0 .
Figure 2: Phase diagram of the gap Δ=Et0s−Ets . Each panel corresponds to a different δmiss , with a color scale shared across panels for direct comparison. At δmiss=0 the mirror construction gives Δ=0 identically (Remark 8 ); as δmiss increases, the region with Δ>0 expands from the large- M0 side. Horizontal axis: Ktot ; vertical axis: M0 .
Figure 3: Auxiliary regime maps based on threshold classification with (τts,τt0s)=(0.15,0.18) , dividing the plane into good/teacher-miss/capacity-limited (and other). Because the classification depends on the thresholds, the main conclusions are drawn from the continuous quantities ( Ets,Et0s,Δ ) of Figs. 1 – 2 .
Figure 4: (Auxiliary) sensitivity to nsamp . Regime classification (colors) and contours of Δ (dashed) at δmiss=0.15 , compared for nsamp∈{500,2000,8000} (independent seeds). The global structure of the boundaries is preserved for all nsamp .