Geometry-aware Latent Autoregressive Generative Model for PDEs in Complex Domains

In this study, we introduce latent PDE mapping, a broadly applicable physics-informed learning technique designed to enable efficient geometric generalization with sparse training data. Latent PDE mapping pulls back geometry-specific PDE residuals and boundary conditions to a predefined latent geometry via the deformation gradient, thereby enabling the automated calculation of geometry-consistent shape gradients that are missing in conventional physics-informed machine learning formulations. We demonstrate the utility of latent PDE mapping in solving the anisotropic Aliev-Panfilov PDE of cardiac electrophysiology using both physics-informed neural networks and physics-informed deep operator networks. The Aliev-Panfilov PDE serves as a challenging exemplar: a nonlinear, time-dependent PDE benchmark with sharp gradients that are expensive to capture using traditional numerical solvers. To represent the limited data regime, we train the networks using just fifteen geometric samples drawn from parameterized distributions in two and three spatial dimensions. While modest improvements appear for geometries parameterized by affine and shear deformations, latent PDE mapping demonstrates significant benefits on select geometric families, achieving a factor ~4-6 reduction in mean relative L2 error. Furthermore, our results show that the computational cost of applying latent PDE mapping was modest during network training, and negligible at inference. Taken together, our study highlights how latent PDE mapping facilitates the creation of generalizable physics-informed machine learning models from limited sets of training geometries.

While Transformers have demonstrated remarkable potential in modeling Partial Differential Equations (PDEs), modeling large-scale unstructured meshes with complex geometries remains a significant challenge. Existing efficient architectures often employ feature dimensionality reduction strategies, which inadvertently induces Geometric Aliasing, resulting in the loss of critical physical boundary information. To address this, we propose the Physics-Geometry Operator Transformer (PGOT), designed to reconstruct physical feature learning through explicit geometry awareness. Specifically, we propose Spectrum-Preserving Geometric Attention (SpecGeo-Attention). Utilizing a ``physics slicing-geometry injection" mechanism, this module incorporates multi-scale geometric encodings to explicitly preserve multi-scale geometric features while maintaining linear computational complexity $O(N)$. Furthermore, PGOT dynamically routes computations to low-order linear paths for smooth regions and high-order non-linear paths for shock waves and discontinuities based on spatial coordinates, enabling spatially adaptive and high-precision physical field modeling. PGOT achieves consistent state-of-the-art performance across four standard benchmarks and excels in large-scale industrial tasks including airfoil and car designs.

We study the problem of \emph{architecture selection} for deep learning models trained to solve partial differential equations (PDEs), asking when transformer-based architectures with learned attention outperform Fourier-domain neural operators. We introduce the \textbf{Multi-Scale Attention Transformer} (\msat{}), a deep learning architecture that encodes spatiotemporal solution histories as token sequences and trains end-to-end via a composite supervised objective with optional physics-informed regularization terms. We conduct a comprehensive empirical evaluation against nine baselines -- including physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), neural operators (FNO, DeepONet, GNOT), and state-space models (Mamba-NO) -- across five benchmark problems from the PINNacle suite, using identical train/test splits and reference data for all methods. \msat{} achieves state-of-the-art generalization on complex geometry problems ($L^2_\mathrm{rel} = 0.0101$ on Heat2D-CG, a $3.7\times$ improvement over FNO) at $34\,\mathrm{s}$ total inference vs.\ $120{,}812\,\mathrm{s}$ for Mamba-NO. Ablation studies over the physics regularization component reveal a precise inductive bias tradeoff: physics priors reduce test error on diffusion-dominated problems but degrade generalization on chaotic and recirculating-flow regimes, directly characterizing the prior misspecification boundary. Approximation error bounds as a function of domain boundary complexity $κ$ provide a theoretical basis for these empirical findings and a principled rule for architecture selection.