A Benchmark for Vehicle Attribute Classification in Cross-Domain Surveillance Scenarios

Vehicle attribute recognition is an important task in intelligent transportation systems, particularly when Automatic License Plate Recognition (ALPR) is unavailable or unreliable. Although vision foundation models have shown strong transferability across domains, their effectiveness for fine-grained vehicle classification remains underexplored. Moreover, given the inherently three-dimensional structure of vehicles, it is unclear whether emerging 3D-aware foundation models offer advantages over standard 2D architectures. This paper presents an empirical benchmark of 14 state-of-the-art 2D and 3D-aware vision foundation models. Using the challenging real-world UFPR-VeSV dataset, we evaluate these models as frozen feature extractors via linear probing for vehicle type, make, and model recognition. We further stress-test the best-performing models under few-shot learning and Out-of-Distribution (OOD) domain shifts. Our results show that standard 2D self-supervised models, particularly DINOv3, substantially outperform 3D-aware models in fine-grained tasks, achieving over 93% Macro-Accuracy for make and model recognition. However, the 3D-aware Depth Anything v2 exhibits stronger invariance to viewing angles in vehicle type classification. These findings motivate hybrid approaches that combine 2D and 3D priors for robust vehicle recognition. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/UFPR-IPASPPR/3D-Vision-Benchmark/.

Robust vehicle detection from fixed CCTV cameras is critical for Intelligent Transportation Systems. Yet existing benchmarks predominantly feature relatively homogeneous, highly organized traffic patterns captured from ego-centric driving perspectives or controlled aerial views. This regional and sensor view bias creates a significant gap. Models trained on datasets such as UA-DETRAC and COCO struggle to generalize to the dense, heterogeneous, disorganized traffic conditions observed in rapidly developing urban centers in emerging economies. To address this limitation, we introduce BMD-45, a large-scale dataset comprising 480K bounding boxes annotated over 45K images captured from over 3.6K operational Safe City CCTV cameras. BMD-45 contains 14 fine-grained vehicle categories, including region-specific modes such as auto-rickshaws and tempo travellers, which are not present in existing benchmarks. The dataset captures real-world deployment challenges, including extreme viewpoint variation, occlusion, and vehicle density . We establish comprehensive baselines using state-of-the-art detectors and reveal a striking domain gap: models fine-tuned on UA-DETRAC achieve only 33.6% mAP@0.50:0.95, compared to 83.8% when trained in-domain on BMD-45, representing a 2.5x improvement that persists even when accounting for novel vehicle classes. This performance gap underscores the critical need for geographically diverse traffic benchmarks and establishes BMD-45 as a baseline for developing robust perception systems in underrepresented urban environments worldwide. The dataset is available at: https://huggingface.co/datasets/iisc-aim/BMD-45.

Vehicle re-identification focuses on retrieving images of the same vehicle from a gallery given a query image. Upon closer inspection of commonly used datasets, we observe that vehicles with few visual differences-e.g., the same make, model, and color-appear in both the training and test sets. As a result, methods that effectively memorize the training data tend to perform well on these test sets but struggle to generalize to other datasets. In this paper, we address this issue by proposing a novel evaluation approach that more effectively measures generalization capability to unseen vehicle types. To further study generalization performance, we also propose splitting the evaluation based on view, allowing us to differentiate the effect of viewpoint robustness from that of same-view re-identification. Our findings reveal that most state-of-the-art methods struggle with unseen vehicle types, and that their robustness to viewpoint changes and attention to detail are limited to vehicle types seen during training.