cs.ROAug 31, 2026

Not All Agreement Counts as Corroboration: Provenance-Conserving Multi-View Fusion for Typed Action Admission in Human-Robot Collaboration

Authors: Zekai Jin, Hanrong Zhang, Yihong Tang, Fei Hu, Zhen Dong, Yi Shao

Abstract

Better probability scores do not establish that evidence has been counted correctly. Repeated inference over one observation can improve predictions without adding an evidential origin. Source-local numerical attributes alone cannot in general distinguish repeated derivations from separately countable acquisitions. PACT (Provenance-Aware evidence Conservation and Typed action admission) separates evidence magnitude from countability through a supplied provenance partition. Under singleton fidelity and insertion non-amplification, the coordinatewise meet is the unique pointwise greatest admissible within-component rule. Component budgets add under stated commensurability and separate-component additivity assumptions. Matched reassignments hold numerical outputs fixed while varying the counting relation. In four of 12 replicated-source tests on HandWritten, false refinement lowers macro-averaged negative log-likelihood and Brier score while increasing normalized common-support area under the risk-coverage curve (ncsAURC). In the controlled handover benchmark, removing the constructed adversarial-consensus condition leaves a 0.056 reduction in ncsAURC for provenance-partition aggregation relative to singleton aggregation under the same score functional. The corroboration contrast disappears, and method ranking remains selection-score dependent. In offline, reference-based human-robot collaboration with four prompts per camera and all other admission inputs fixed, duplicating each prompt output within its camera from multiplicity one to eight leaves all 720 PACT typed responses per checkpoint unchanged. Probability quality and evidence countability require separate evaluation.

Explore similar work

CardsList
May 23, 2026cs.RO

PACT: Proactive Asking for Continual Task Assistance in Human-Robot Collaboration

Robotic assistants in long-term human-robot collaboration need to assist users under partial observations while leveraging cross-day interaction history. However, human traits and routines are often unknown at the beginning of collaboration, making passive infer-then-act assistance ineffective and inefficient. To address this challenge, we study a cross-day proactive asking setting for continual task assistance and propose PACT (Proactive Asking for Continual Task Assistance), an ask-or-act framework that determines whether clarification should be sought before taking action. PACT leverages current observations together with accumulated interaction history to evaluate contextual sufficiency, enabling the robot to provide more reliable assistance and progressively adapt to the user over time. We implement its primary learned instantiation using reinforcement learning and evaluate alternative instantiations under the same framework. To assess such behavior, we further introduce a clarification utility metric that quantifies the trade-off between assistance accuracy and the frequency of clarification requests. Experiments in multi-day embodied collaboration scenarios demonstrate that, compared with passive inference baselines, PACT consistently improves both assistance accuracy and clarification utility, highlighting the importance of proactive asking in continual human-robot collaboration.
Chengbo He, Sheng Li, Chenyang Ma +6
Human-Robot CollaborationProactiveInteraction History
AskPDF
Sep 15, 2026cs.RO

Exact Fusion and Coordinated Exploration in Multi-Robot Active Inference

Robot teams that learn a common environment model exchange belief summaries and plan by the expected information gain of their actions. Under conjugate exponential-family beliefs the shared belief is counted once per robot at two points: at fusion, the product of local posteriors counts the common prior nn times, and at planning, every robot scores its plan under the same belief and the team converges on the same unknown. Both errors are removed by adding evidence increments to the shared natural parameter, realized increments at fusion and expected increments at planning. The expected increment of a committed teammate gives the next robot its conditional gain; corrected gains sum to the joint gain, the redundancy removed equals the total correlation of the planned observation streams, and sequential commitment keeps the 1/21/2 greedy guarantee. The expected increment is exact for Gaussian beliefs with fixed sampling paths and for Dirichlet beliefs under the novelty approximation of discrete active inference, whose team objective has a closed concave form within an explicit bound of the exact mutual information, and fails for finite hypothesis classes, where a short exact enumeration replaces it. Experiments on cooperative RockSample, foraging, and field monitoring show that fusion correction leaves exploration redundancy unchanged, anticipated evidence removes it, and sequential commitment recovers most of the value of centralized joint planning at cost linear in the team size.
Peng Wu, Mohsen Imani, Amidu Kamara +3
Multi-Robot SystemsBelief-Space PlanningUncertainty-Aware Fusion
AskPDF
Apr 16, 2026cs.RO

Vision-Based Safe Human-Robot Collaboration with Uncertainty Guarantees

We propose a framework for vision-based human pose estimation and motion prediction that gives conformal prediction guarantees for certifiably safe human-robot collaboration. Our framework combines aleatoric uncertainty estimation with OOD detection for high probabilistic confidence. To integrate our pipeline in certifiable safety frameworks, we propose conformal prediction sets for human motion predictions with high, valid confidence. We evaluate our pipeline on recorded human motion data and a real-world human-robot collaboration setting.
Jakob Thumm, Marian Frei, Tianle Ni +2
Human-Robot CollaborationHuman Motion Prediction3D Human Pose EstimationConformal Prediction
AskPDF