Evaluation of Phonetic Encoding Algorithms on Transcription Datasets

Fréchet Audio Distance (FAD) is the de facto standard for evaluating text-to-audio generation, yet its scores depend on the underlying encoder's embedding space. An encoder's training task dictates which acoustic features are preserved or discarded, causing FAD to inherit systematic task-induced biases. We decompose evaluation into Recall, Precision, and Alignment (split into semantic and structural dimensions), using log-scale normalization for fair cross-encoder comparison. Controlled experiments on six encoders across two datasets reveal a four-axis trade-off: reconstruction-based AudioMAE leads precision sensitivity; ASR-trained Whisper dominates structural detection but is blind to signal degradation; classification-trained VGGish maximizes semantic detection but penalizes legitimate intra-class variation. Since no single encoder is a universal evaluator, future metrics must shift toward evaluation-native encoders intrinsically aligned with human perception.

Comparing text strings is crucial when evaluating and understanding the performance of various text processing tasks such as document recognition and audio transcription. With an increasingly complex landscape of AI-based handwritten text recognition (HTR), optical character recognition (OCR) and automatic speech recognition (ASR) models, there is a need for tools that facilitate evaluation in a flexible and reproducible way. This paper presents Stringalign, a Python library designed to simplify the evaluation process for automatic transcription projects and facilitate transparent evaluation. Stringalign's tools to examine and visualise both the rate of errors and the types of errors a model makes, give insights into possible improvements and help inform model selection for a particular task. Widely used string comparison metrics, such as the character and word error rates (CER and WER), although useful, can be ambiguous due to varying definitions of what constitutes a character and a word. Stringalign addresses this challenge by ensuring all preprocessing (i.e. normalisation and tokenisation) is transparent and easily replicable, and by providing tools to move beyond summary statistics and analyse common model errors. Moreover, Stringalign adheres to FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) principles for research software while staying lightweight and easy to adapt into researchers existing workflows. In this paper, we discuss challenges with character and word level string comparisons and show through examples that where existing tools can yield opaque and sometimes confusing results, Stringalign provides an easy-to-use and unambiguous alternative.

Speech-to-IPA transcription is useful when the desired output is pronunciation rather than orthographic text, but competitive multilingual systems are often large and evaluation is sensitive to normalization choices. This paper presents BranchShine, a 33M-parameter raw-audio CTC recognizer with a lightweight convolutional front end and a 19-block RoPE E-Branchformer encoder. We find that BranchShine provides a compact and competitive operating point for IPA transcription under matched normalization and scoring. On a 16,660-utterance multilingual test set covering 41 language labels, BranchShine obtains 9.19% whitespace-insensitive IPA character error rate, compared with 9.78% for the 575.00M-parameter PhoneticXEUS baseline. A secondary child speech reading analysis shows a complementary operating profile: BranchShine is more conservative on incorrect readings, while Whisper-Medium is stronger on exact acceptance of correct readings. Overall, the results indicate that a compact raw-audio-to-IPA model can approach much larger baselines on character-level IPA transcription.