Dementia is a major and growing global health burden, with Alzheimer's disease (AD) accounting for most cases. Timely and accurate diagnosis is central to managing this burden and increasingly depends on integrating complementary clinical and imaging information. Multimodal deep learning can combine these modalities for AD diagnosis, but how its explanations behave across modalities, fusion strategies, and cohorts remains unclear. We developed an explainable multimodal framework pairing a 3D CNN encoder for T1-weighted MRI with a feedforward network for harmonized clinical and demographic data, comparing varied model setups on three-way and pairwise diagnostic tasks using 6,479 internal records from the ADNI and 1,703 independent records from the OASIS-3. On ADNI, the tabular-only model achieved the highest three-class AUC-ROC of 0.879 and best discriminated cognitively normal (CN) versus mild cognitive impairment (MCI; 0.903), while cross-attention performed best for MCI versus AD (0.861); CN versus AD was highly discriminative overall. On OASIS-3, the vision-only model performed best (three-class AUC-ROC 0.910); CN versus MCI remained difficult, and no fusion strategy consistently outperformed single modalities across tasks and cohorts. SHAP and Integrated Gradients identified the MMSE as the dominant tabular feature in both cohorts, with global feature rankings agreeing strongly in ADNI (ρ=0.94) and OASIS-3 (ρ=0.96); CAM-based explanations, however, changed with model configuration and cohort. These findings show that multimodal performance and explanations are task, modality, fusion, and cohort-dependent: a dominant cognitive signal persisted across cohorts, but feature contributions and CAM explanations did not, underscoring the need to evaluate explainability under cohort shift rather than as a stable, intrinsic property.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is an irreversible neurodegenerative disorder and a leading cause of death worldwide. Early diagnosis plays an important part especially at the Mild Cognitive Impairment stage, where timely intervention can help slow its progression before it advances to AD. Neuroimaging data, like Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scans, can help detect brain changes early by providing structural and functional brain changes related to the disease. Yet, many multimodal models still fuse MRI and PET with static concatenation and apply identical computation to all subjects, which limits robustness to patient/site heterogeneity and can waste computation. To address these limitations, we present the first study of combining 3D convolutional feature extractors with three fusion strategies - concatenation, Gated Multimodal Unit (GMU), and gated self-attention - and a sparsely gated Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) classifier that performs input-adaptive routing, activating only the most informative experts per case. Finally, we utilize Grad-CAM to visualize disease-related regions, ensuring model interpretability. Experiments are performed across three binary classification tasks (NC vs. MCI, MCI vs. AD, and NC vs. AD). Results show that GMU achieves accuracies of 80.46 % (NC vs. MCI) and 95.47 % (NC vs. AD), while gated self-attention attains 82.08 % on MCI vs. AD. Ablations show that removing the MoE consistently degrades accuracy across all tasks. These findings underscore the value of input-adaptive, multimodal modeling for AD diagnosis by leveraging the complementary nature of MRI and PET.
In longitudinal Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis support, clinical and imaging information is often collected at irregular visits. Integrating these multimodal observations may improve diagnostic assessment, but naive fusion can degrade performance when MRI is noisy or intermittently unavailable. We propose AT-Attn, a temporal-aware multimodal framework that combines Change-and-Time encoding, time-biased asymmetric cross-attention, and gated fusion to integrate MRI with longitudinal clinical information. We evaluate AT-Attn on an MRI-retained ADNI cohort of 1,520 patients using structural MRI, six cognitive-scale trajectories, and seven static clinical variables under patient-level five-fold cross-validation. The main asymmetric AT-Attn model achieves accuracy 0.719+/-0.024, macro F1 0.721+/-0.023, ROC-AUC 0.873+/-0.013, and PR-AUC 0.783+/-0.018, outperforming unimodal and naive multimodal fusion baselines while remaining competitive with strong tabular baselines. These results suggest that a temporal-aware and constrained fusion strategy can help structural MRI contribute clinically relevant complementary information for patient-level AD diagnosis support.
Deep networks trained on structural MRI for Alzheimer's disease (AD) staging often reach reasonable accuracy while attending to anatomically irrelevant regions, and multimodal models that add clinical tables frequently rely on variables that were used to assign the diagnostic label in the first place. We study both issues with a deliberately lightweight slice-based encoder (ResNet18 with a one-layer Transformer over slices) on 1,075 baseline T1-weighted scans from ADNI-1. First, we use FastSurfer segmentations as an anatomical reference: YOLOv8 models trained on segmentation-derived labels localize Alzheimer-relevant structures with mAP_50 above 0.96, and a Grad-CAM comparison shows that the image-only classifier frequently attends to the skull, orbits and background. Second, we adapt a CLIP-style image - tabular contrastive framework and organize ADNIMERGE variables along a label-leakage spectrum. Fusion with cognitive scores yields 87.3% three-way accuracy, which we treat as a leakage-driven upper bound rather than an imaging result; fusion with regional volumes yields 73.0%. We observe that the choice of contrastive target changes what the image encoder learns: on MCI vs. CN, the image-only head reaches 52.4% when the encoder is aligned to cognitive scores and 73.8% when aligned to volumes, although no tabular input is used at inference. Third, restricting the input to a per-subject crop of the medial temporal lobe raises image-only three-way accuracy from 58.7% to 65.1%. All results come from single runs on a small balanced test set, and we report confidence intervals and the protocol differences that prevent direct comparison with published numbers.