cs.LGSep 14, 2026

Quantile-based Loss Filtering for Outlier-Robust Stochastic Gradient Descent

Authors: Jamie HaddockAnna MaElizaveta Rebrova

Abstract

We study loss-based filtering for finite-sum optimization with a subset of corrupted component functions whose gradients may be highly unreliable. Motivated by minimum-loss-based SGD (min-kk-loss) and quantile-based methods for corrupted linear systems, we propose and analyze a general loss-filtering framework -- Quantile-kk-Loss SGD (QkkL-SGD) -- that samples kk component losses at each iteration and updates using an index chosen uniformly from the lower empirical qq-quantile. We prove linear convergence of this family of methods under standard convexity assumptions, requiring the sample size to scale with the number of corruptions and a subset strong-convexity threshold. For the cases when large enough sampling is impossible or undesirable, we give a complementary small-sample probabilistic analysis that covers any sample size kk and the convergence behavior depends on the probability of selecting an outlier and on the curvature of the selected good step. Experiments on polynomial regression, regularized logistic regression, and regularized hinge loss show that intermediate quantiles often outperform both standard SGD and min-kk-loss SGD. In particular, min-kk often stalls by repeatedly selecting nearly solved components, while intermediate quantiles retain robustness and produce more informative updates.

Explore similar work

Jun 20, 2026cs.LG

Alternate loss functions and regression models that achieve robustness to outliers by modulating the learning rate

Most real-world datasets used for training supervised learning models are contaminated with noisy data and outliers leading to large prediction errors. This paper proposes a new approach for achieving robustness where the learning rate is modulated by a factor that is sensitive to outliers. In this approach a reduction of the learning rate is shown to be achieved by using alternate loss functions that are infinitely differentiable, strictly convex or quasiconvex and more closely approximate the absolute error than Huber and log-cosh losses. A comparison of the performance of regression models trained with different loss functions on a wide variety of benchmarks and datasets is presented to demonstrate the superior performance of the Square Root Loss (SRL) and Smooth Mean Absolute Error (SMAE) losses proposed in this paper. Two new robust linear regression models are presented. Highly vectorized robust parameter update formulae that take advantage of modern GPUs for both stochastic and batch gradient descent are presented.
Mathew Mithra Noel, Arindam Banerjee, Yug D. Oswal +2
May 8, 2026math.OC

Robust stochastic first order methods in heavy-tailed noise via medoid mini-batch gradient sampling

We consider a first order stochastic optimization framework where, at each iteration, KK independent identically distributed (i.i.d.) data point samples are drawn, based on which stochastic gradients can be queried. We allow gradient noise to be heavy-tailed, with possibly infinite variances. For the considered heavy-tailed setting, many algorithmic variants have recently been proposed based on gradient clipping or other nonlinear operators (e.g., normalization) applied over noisy gradients. In this paper, we take an alternative approach and propose a novel stochastic first order method dubbed Robust Stochastic Gradient Descent with medoid mini-batch gradient sampling, R-SGD-Mini for short. The core idea of R-SGD-Mini is to split the KK-sized data batch into MM distinct data chunks, form for each chunk the stochastic gradient, and update the solution estimate with respect to the stochastic gradient direction of the chunk that is medoid of gradients of all data-chunks. Under a general class of symmetric heavy-tailed gradient noises and a standard non-convex setting, we establish explicit bounds on the expected time-averaged squared gradient norm. More precisely, we show that the latter quantity converges at rate O(T1)\mathcal{O}(T^{-1}) to a small neighborhood of zero; we explicitly characterize this neighborhood in terms of noise and algorithm's parameters. Moreover, if the time horizon is known in advance, we establish the rate of O(T12).\mathcal{O}(T^{-\frac{1}{2}}). Furthermore, when clipping is incorporated, we obtain convergence guaranties in the high-probability sense and recover the same rate. Experimental results indicate that R-SGD-Mini and its clipped variant consistently perform favorably compared to SGD, clipped SGD and Median-of-Means based methods.
Manojlo Vukovic, Dusan Jakovetic
May 19, 2025stat.ML

Online simultaneous inference for quantiles via smoothed stochastic gradient descent

This paper considers the estimation of quantiles via a smoothed version of the stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithm. By smoothing the score function with a bandwidth tied to the learning rate, we obtain estimates that are monotone in the quantile level at every iteration, while retaining the memory and computational efficiency required for streaming data. We establish non-asymptotic tail probability bounds for the smoothed estimate with and without Polyak-Ruppert averaging, which are sub-exponential with a multi-regime structure. For the averaged estimate we further derive a Bahadur representation that is uniform in the quantile level and across coordinates, and a resulting Gaussian approximation by the maximum of Brownian bridges, with the dimension pp allowed to grow exponentially in the sample size. This yields simultaneous inference across coordinates and quantile levels. As an alternative that avoids estimating the sparsity function, we propose an online multiplier bootstrap that preserves monotonicity, runs in a single pass and is asymptotically valid. Extending the theory to a localized recursion, we obtain online nonparametric conditional quantile estimates with uniform bands over design points and quantile levels. Simulations confirm accurate finite-sample coverage, and we illustrate the method on conditional value-at-risk curves.
Likai Chen, Georg Keilbar, Wei Biao Wu