Equilibrium bias and convergence in augmented primal--dual dynamics with sampled constraints
Authors: Kang Liu, Mengxiao Chen, Siqi Xiong, Yi Xia
Organizations: School of Future Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China · School of Automation Science and Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China · Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
This work studies the stability and convergence of augmented primal-dual dynamics when constraint values are estimated from samples. Unbiased constraint observations can produce a biased augmented multiplier signal, shifting the equilibria of the mean dynamics. For componentwise inequalities, we give a necessary and sufficient condition for preserving the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) equilibria and construct a convex example with a locally exponentially stable equilibrium that violates complementarity. To address this bias, constraint values are estimated recursively before forming the augmented multiplier signal. For smooth convex conic problems, a joint energy analysis establishes boundedness of the primal, dual, and estimation states, vanishing estimation error, and almost sure convergence of the primal-dual iterates to a single KKT point under global regularity and bounded conditional second moments. The result allows nonunique solutions and multipliers while keeping the number of samples per iteration fixed. Numerical studies illustrate the predicted equilibrium bias and examine convergence with nonunique KKT points and nonlinear constraints.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Bias and equilibrium displacement. In panel (a), lines show the formulas in Corollary 4.2 ; markers show antithetic estimates, with error bars of 1.96 estimated standard errors computed across independent pairs. In panel (b), points show final means over 32 paths, with error bars of one sample standard deviation. The dotted line shows the prediction in ( 7.1 ).
Figure 2: REC on the problem in ( 7.2 ). Panel (a) shows means and one sample standard deviation over all 24 paths at the indicated checkpoints. Panel (b) shows the free multiplier coordinate (2u1−u2)/5 for the first replicate in each initialization group, without smoothing or averaging. This coordinate is unrestricted in the KKT set ( 7.3 ).
Figure 3: Nonlinear study with noise amplitude σ=2 . Curves show mean current residuals over 48 runs on six test instances. Panel (a) uses a common optimization step formula, indexed by update count, to compare constraint estimation strategies. Panel (b) uses the separately calibrated step parameters of each method. The horizontal budget counts observation tuples, each containing one stochastic gradient vector and one stochastic constraint vector; every sample in a batch is counted.
σ
Method
104R
102Ef
102Vc
0.5
RAW ( B=1 )
14.27±6.34
1.29±0.53
0.29±0.39
RAW ( B=4 )
1.11±0.50
0.22±0.15
0.25±0.20
CG
0.63±0.34
0.25±0.16
0.55±0.21
REC
0.59±0.33
0.23±0.15
0.52±0.21
PPD
0.84±0.40
0.17±0.13
0.45±0.22
SLPMM
12.02±5.09
0.35±0.14
0.62±0.18
Table 1: Nonlinear comparison after 20000 observation tuples using separately calibrated step parameters. Entries are means ± sample standard deviations over 48 runs per noise level. The residual R is evaluated at the current primal–dual state. The errors Ef and Vc are evaluated at the prescribed averaged primal output for SLPMM and APriD and at the current primal state for the other methods. Column headings indicate the numerical scaling.
Appendix figures & tables2 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
σ
Method
102Ef
102Vc
0.5
RAW ( B=1 )
1.17±0.16
0.07±0.11
RAW ( B=4 )
0.11±0.09
0.32±0.16
CG
0.76±0.17
1.25±0.24
REC
0.68±0.18
1.14±0.24
PPD
0.49±0.20
0.95±0.28
SLPMM
0.35±0.14
0.62±0.18
Appendix
Table 2: Averaged primal outputs with separately calibrated step scales. Means ± sample standard deviations cover 48 runs per noise level. APriD uses its prescribed weights; all other averages are arithmetic.
σ
Estimate
104R
102∥y−c(x)∥2
0.5
RAW ( B=1 )
9.82±2.81
—
RAW ( B=4 )
1.41±0.52
—
CG
0.63±0.34
1.82±1.29
REC
0.59±0.33
0.18±0.12
2
RAW ( B=1 )
922.41±231.21
—
RAW ( B=4 )
143.86±35.12
—
Appendix
Table 3: Constraint estimation with a common optimization step formula indexed by update count. Each noise level has 48 runs and a budget of 20000 tuples. Batch size four uses 5000 updates; the other configurations use 20000 . A dash indicates that there is no recursive estimate.
Primal-dual optimization jointly updates decision variables and constraint multipliers to solve constrained problems with feasibility and optimality guarantees.
We study nonasymptotic convergence of primal-dual methods for a class of nonconvex constrained optimization problems under local multiplier regularity. Both the objective and functional inequality constraints are compositions of convex Lipschitz outer functions with smooth nonlinear mappings. Unlike existing analyses requiring regularity globally or along the entire iterate sequence, we impose multiplier regularity only near the feasible set. Using an auxiliary minimax problem with a compact dual set, we derive Lyapunov estimates that identify nearly feasible iterates under feasible initialization and a sufficiently large penalty, without assuming multiplier boundedness. Local regularity then bounds the associated multipliers and makes dual truncation inactive, yielding approximate KKT certificates for the original problem. The smoothed prox-linear augmented Lagrangian method with dual regularization yields an O(K−1/3) KKT residual rate. Without regularization, piecewise linear outer functions and additional local structural assumptions yield a local dual error bound and the sharper O(K−1/2) rate.
Linglingzhi Zhu, Jiajin Li
H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA. · Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Augmented Lagrangian and optimistic primal--dual methods stabilize equality-constrained optimization through seemingly different mechanisms: the former adds constraint-dependent primal curvature, while the latter adds dual memory. Recent work has shown that these mechanisms are equivalent for scalar parameters. We extend this equivalence to matrix-valued correction. We prove an additivity principle: for symmetric matrix parameters, the ideal primal trajectory depends only on the summed correction matrix, not on how it is split between augmented and optimistic channels. This exposes a design freedom: algebraically equivalent decompositions can have different finite-step feasibility because augmented correction affects primal curvature, whereas optimistic correction affects the scale of the dual memory correction. We formulate the resulting step-size-limited design problem and derive a closed-form hybrid rule that selects a matrix correction, splits it between the two channels, and chooses primal and dual steps using local spectral weights. Experiments on nonlinear equality-constrained problems with controlled constraint-Jacobian conditioning show that the hybrid design improves over pure augmented and pure optimistic endpoints, closely tracks a grid-search hybrid oracle, and is competitive with first-order primal--dual baselines under mild-to-moderate ill-conditioning. The experiments also identify the expected limitation: exact cancellation requires increasingly large matrix corrections as the constraint Jacobian becomes ill-conditioned.
For solving nonconvex equality-constrained optimization problems, a recent Gradient-Eigenstep Algorithm by Goyens et al.~is an iteration-efficient approach, based on minimizing Fletcher's augmented Lagrangian function, for finding an approximate second-order stationary point from an arbitrary starting point. In this paper, the analysis of this algorithm is extended, offering a two-fold contribution. First, it is shown that a local-linear rate of convergence can be obtained by this method if it is initiated sufficiently close to a strong second-order stationary point and employs a sufficiently small step-size parameter and sufficiently large penalty parameter. In this case, the algorithm reduces to a gradient descent algorithm applied to minimize Fletcher's augmented Lagrangian. Second, as a particularly useful application of the first result, it is shown that the Gradient-Eigenstep algorithm can be used as an iteration-efficient subproblem solver in the context of a progressive sampling strategy for solving equality-constrained optimization problems when the objective and constraint functions are defined by large sample averages, ultimately offering an algorithm with an improved worst-case sample complexity when compared to an approach that solves a full-sample problem directly.
Frank E. Curtis, Lingjun Guo, Daniel P. Robinson
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Lehigh University