Person re-identification (ReID) is essential for multi-camera surveillance and tracking, yet remains difficult due to viewpoint and illumination changes, occlusion, background clutter, and low resolution imagery. We propose a generative AI integrated multimodal ReID framework designed explicitly for robustness under missing cues and low latency deployment. The key idea is a cost aware early-exit cascade that prioritizes inexpensive, high confidence evidence and only triggers expensive modalities for ambiguous cases. Our system integrates (i) global visual embeddings from segmented person regions, (ii) automatically generated fine grained semantic attribute descriptions generated by vision-language models (VLMs), and (iii) optional facial embeddings when face observations are reliable. To optimize the balance between accuracy and latency, we use a cost aware early-exit cascade instead of fusing all modalities. Specifically, we first inspect the top-k retrieval results to determine whether the query is unambiguous. If the best match is clearly separated from the remaining candidates, we stop early and return the result to minimize latency; in ambiguous cases, we keep multiple hypotheses and invoke additional modalities (face/semantic) with adaptive reliability weighting to refine the decision. We report person re-identification performance using mAP and Rank-1 accuracy on the Market-1501 and DukeMTMC-reID benchmarks. The proposed adaptive early-exit cascade resolves 60.7% of DukeMTMC-reID queries and 68.4% of Market-1501 queries without invoking semantic reasoning, reducing computational overhead while maintaining competitive retrieval performance.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Proposed generative AI integrated multimodal framework for multi-camera person re-identification with early-exit cascade retrieval and temporal aggregation.
Backbone
Method
DukeMTMC-reID
Market-1501
mAP
Rank-1
mAP
Rank-1
CNN
MGN [ 16 ]
78.4
88.7
86.9
95.7
DG-Net [ 17 ]
74.8
86.6
86.0
94.8
SAN [ 18 ]
75.5
87.9
88.0
96.1
Pyramid [ 19 ]
79.0
89.0
88.2
95.7
ViT
TransReID [ 20 ]
80.6
89.6
88.2
95.0
TABLE I: Comparison with State-of-the-Art Methods
Component
Latency (ms)
% Time
Mean
Min
Max
Semantic Extraction
2125.30
1455.04
3070.61
96.1
Visual Extraction
34.54
19.90
71.96
1.6
Face Extraction
27.53
2.19
283.08
1.2
Detection + Crop
18.82
8.52
985.65
1.0
Cascade Retrieval
3.67
0.67
86.54
0.1
TABLE II: Component-wise Latency Analysis
Cascade Outcome
DukeMTMC-reID
Market-1501
Queries
%
Queries
%
Early-Exit
1352
60.7
2303
68.4
Escalated
876
39.3
1065
31.6
No Match
0
0.0
0
0.0
Total
2228
100.0
3368
100.0
TABLE III: Cascade Path Distribution Across Datasets
Fig. 2: Qualitative comparison of the same identity across different camera views: (a) and (b).
Department of Computer Science, Drexel University · School of Electrical Engineering and Robotics, Queensland University of Technology · Department of Electrical and Computer Engineerin, Drexel University