Open-vocabulary multimodal emotion recognition (OV-MER) aims to generate open natural-language emotion labels from multimodal affective cues. In real-world scenarios, however, complete and synchronized modal data are difficult to obtain due to limitations of acquisition devices and user privacy constraints. Existing OV-MER methods are largely designed for full-modal inputs, and fail to perform effective feature fusion under modal missing conditions. Meanwhile, current fusion approaches designed for incomplete modalities mainly focus on fixed-label recognition context, and cannot satisfy the demand for fuse emotional cues guided with arbitrary emotion semantics in OV-MER context. To tackle these challenges, this paper proposes an Affect-Prototype-Conditioned Fusion (APCF) framework for incomplete open-vocabulary emotion recognition. As a candidate-free generative framework, APCF extends modal contribution learning to scenarios guided by arbitrary emotional semantics. Specifically, we construct an affect-prototype library to explicitly model multimodal contribution characteristics corresponding to diverse emotions, which provides dynamic constraints for modal fusion under different emotional semantic perspectives. Conditional retrieval and feature aggregation are conducted based on available modal features. The refined fused affective representations are then fed into an LLM decoder to produce open-vocabulary emotion labels. Experiments on the OV-MERD+ and MER-FG datasets demonstrate that APCF substantially outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of the proposed APCF framework.
Figure 2: Structure of affect-prototype causal routing.
Modality view
Dataset
Method
A
V
T
AV
AT
VT
AVT
OV-MERD+
OV-MER ( Lian et al. 2025c )
33.914
45.211
47.085
44.969
48.304
50.163
46.952
Emotion-LLaMA ( Cheng et al. 2024 )
29.104
29.464
38.215
48.257
42.108
44.961
54.439
AffectGPT ( Lian et al. 2025a )
46.655
49.138
53.775
54.160
55.650
60.518
62.229
AffectAgent-R ( Wang et al. 2026 )
48.226
49.941
53.594
55.502
58.173
61.004
62.832
APCF (ours)
56.490
50.587
54.116
58.818
61.086
61.193
63.015
Table 1: Open-vocabulary comparison on OV-MERD+ and MER-FG. Cells report (%): level-1 F1 on OV-MERD+ and Avg on MER-FG.
Modality view
Dataset
Method
A
V
T
AV
AT
VT
AVT
OV-MERD+
MulT ( Tsai et al. 2019 )
9.491
10.361
47.778
18.591
47.786
47.702
47.791
MMIN ( Zhao et al. 2021 )
17.740
21.856
48.359
22.249
48.230
48.351
48.399
MPLMM ( Guo et al. 2024 )
49.852
49.981
48.989
55.724
53.447
54.660
56.148
ComP ( He et al. 2026 )
41.342
35.055
50.147
14.592
49.797
49.832
49.783
BALM-FCM ( Nguyen et al. 2026 )
45.144
40.286
46.771
55.580
53.719
48.441
54.402
Table 2: Comparison with missing-modality methods adapted to open-vocabulary emotion generation. Cells report the dataset-native score (%): level-1 F1 on OV-MERD+ and Avg on MER-FG.
Tested components
All7 (%)
MVL
SPT
PSF
TPA
SCR
OV-MERD+
MER-FG
∘
∘
∘
∘
∘
48.38
36.87
∙
∘
∘
∘
∘
53.87
40.36
∙
∙
∘
∘
∘
53.42
40.93
∙
∙
∙
∘
∘
54.19
41.05
∙
∙
∙
∙
∘
55.82
41.08
Table 3: APCF component ablation. Filled and open circles denote enabled and disabled components. Values are the average over all seven modality combinations (All7, %), using level-1 F1 on OV-MERD+ and Avg on MER-FG. Best results are bold.
Figure 3: Affect-prototype adaptation diagnostics averaged over target-training seeds 64, 65, and 71.