Aligned Consensus Teaching for Label-Efficient Oriented Object Detection in Weakly-Aligned Visible-Infrared Imagery
Organizations: Beijing University of Technology · University of Science and Technology of China · Peking University · Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences ·
Abstract
Visible-infrared object detection (VIOD) detects objects with oriented bounding boxes from paired visible and infrared images. Existing methods depend on costly dual-modality annotations. Semi-supervised learning can reduce this burden, but extending it from single-modal detection to VIOD is challenging. In the practical image-pair-level setting considered here, only a few pairs are labeled in both modalities, while the rest are completely unlabeled. This limited supervision creates three challenges: (i) too few labeled boxes for robust cross-modal alignment; (ii) pseudo-label errors caused by branch-wise misses accumulate during self-training; and (iii) tail-class annotations become critically scarce as the labeling budget decreases. We propose Aligned Consensus Teacher (ACT) for label-efficient VIOD in this setting. Its Cycle-Consistent Region Alignment (CRA) combines cycle consistency and sparse anchors with reliability-weighted regional matching. Cross-Modal Consensus Mean-Teacher (CMC-MT) forms consensus pseudo labels under pair-preserving views to recover branch-wise misses and supervise unlabeled pairs. Text-Guided Cross-Modal Instance Augmentation (TG-CMIA) uses a vision-language scene prior to compose tail-class instance pairs while preserving RGB--IR offsets. To the best of our knowledge, ACT is the first framework to study semi-supervised VIOD under this image-pair-level setting. Experiments on DroneVehicle and VEDAI show consistent gains across annotation ratios. With 10% labeled pairs on DroneVehicle, ACT reaches 94.3% of the mAP obtained by the same detector under full supervision. Code and models will be available on GitHub to facilitate future work.
Figures & tables
| Method | car | truck | bus | van | freight | mAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C 2 Former [ 41 ] | 0.896 | 0.442 | 0.872 | 0.340 | 0.326 | 0.575 |
| DMM [ 47 ] | 0.900 | 0.555 | 0.888 | 0.449 | 0.521 | 0.663 |
| SM3Det [ 18 ] | 0.897 | 0.474 | 0.881 | 0.360 | 0.434 | 0.609 |
| M2D-LIF [ 45 ] | 0.889 | 0.508 | 0.778 | 0.412 | 0.423 | 0.602 |
| MT [ 31 ] | 0.890 | 0.492 | 0.880 | 0.364 | 0.435 | 0.612 |
| SOOD [ 11 ] | 0.897 | 0.462 | 0.862 | 0.367 | 0.383 | 0.594 |
| Components | Annotation ratio | |||||
| CMC-MT | TG-CMIA | CRA | 1% | 5% | 10% | 100% |
| 0.299 | 0.485 | 0.575 | 0.724 | |||
| ✓ | 0.489 | 0.619 | 0.665 | – | ||
| ✓ | ✓ | 0.510 | 0.639 | 0.679 | – | |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 0.511 | 0.644 | 0.683 | – |
Object Detection
Object detection locates and classifies objects in images or video, balancing localization accuracy, robustness, and inference speed.
See all 629 papers