Robots searching for a target from a natural-language description must determine not only where to search, but also which observed candidate is the desired target. These decisions reflect two distinct sources of uncertainty - spatial uncertainty over candidate locations and semantic uncertainty over target identity - that are often conflated in VLM-based search systems. We introduce a spatial-semantic uncertainty formulation that maintains separate beliefs over each component and integrates probabilistic VLM evidence into a global target-identity posterior, including probability mass for undiscovered targets. This decomposition allows an information-theoretic planner to independently value candidate discovery and target disambiguation through spatial and semantic expected information gain (EIG), providing an explicit mechanism for trading broader exploration against earlier identification. We evaluate six VLM uncertainty-elicitation interfaces on 500 synthetic targets and show that similar recognition accuracy can conceal substantial differences in calibration and false confidence. In degraded-observation search-and-identify experiments, EIG-based planners reach confident decisions in 75.0%-92.5% of trials, compared with 20.0% for Random search, while different spatial-semantic weightings achieve comparable identification accuracy once confidence is attained. Increasing semantic emphasis reduces unnecessary exploration and VLM queries, demonstrating that explicitly planning over semantic uncertainty can accelerate target resolution without sacrificing decision quality. These results highlight the distinct roles of uncertainty representation and uncertainty-driven planning in embodied VLM systems.
Theory of Space framework (ToS) assesses the spatial understanding of curiosity-driven Vision-Language Models (VLMs) under partial observability. As AI techniques are increasingly applied to safety-critical scenarios, it is crucial to understand whether VLMs possess robust spatial memory and make reliable decisions. In this paper, we assess whether VLMs' decisions are based on physical evidence or are corrupted by visual-language biases, if their memory processes align with human cognitive patterns, and how they respond to environmental hazards. We extend the ToS framework into a safety-critical, goal-driven pipeline, named Explore, Map, Remember, and Decide (EMRD). We then quantify Exploration Competence (Explore) through metrics of environmental coverage and temporal efficiency, assess Spatial Fidelity (Map), evaluate, with a suite of psychological metrics, Memory Persistence (Remember), and measure, using focal-point metrics, Cognitive Decision-Making (Decide). Our results show that in terms of decision-making capabilities, VLMs frequently select evacuation points based on pre-trained textual priors while lacking the spatial grounding to justify their choices. We also show that spatial reasoning degrades in low-light conditions, but it is not affected by texture and colour tampering. Our findings suggest that VLM memory fundamentally diverges from human cognition, creating unpredictable risks of misalignment.
Gabriele La Malfa, Nitay Alon, Emanuele La Malfa +2
Robots deployed in human-centric environments routinely receive natural-language descriptions of spatial information ("I left my backpack on the table") that reference parts of the world beyond their perceptual field of view. Traditional metric-semantic mapping ignores this signal, while off-the-shelf multimodal models remain limited in 3D spatial reasoning and are not directly amenable to fusion with other sensor modalities. To convert language observations into a calibrated spatial distribution, we train a Language Sensor Model (LSM) that maps each utterance and its scene-graph context to a multimodal distribution, with mixture weights encoding referential ambiguity (e.g., "which table") and component covariances encoding spatial uncertainty (e.g., where "on the table" the target lies). We then introduce VL-Map (Vision-Language Metric-Semantic Mapping), a probabilistic framework that treats these language predictions as stochastic observations and fuses them with onboard perception within a unified belief map. On the VLA-3D benchmark as well as on a real-world mobile robot, LSM is the only language predictor whose covariance estimates remain within the calibrated regime; fused into VL-Map, it leads to more accurate predictions of the target object location (~70% more probability mass on the true target compared to the strongest foundation-model baseline).
Long-horizon robot operation requires spatio-temporal memory to record the environment state and recall it for downstream reasoning. Scene graphs and retrieval-augmented systems ground VLM descriptions to persistent 3D entities with rich semantic descriptions. However, VLM captions are noisy and viewpoint-inconsistent, and existing systems treat them as an oracle with no mechanism to detect unreliable stored descriptions. We introduce object-level semantic uncertainty for multi-view VLM memory: a score that measures object-centric cross-view semantic scatter of captions and identifies semantically unresolved objects. Then, we include our uncertainty scores in an advanced spatial-semantic memory system, that we dub UQ-DAAAM. UQ-DAAAM uses this score to actively refine uncertain objects under a fixed query budget by selecting high-quality views and fusing the resulting multi-view captions into a single object description. We also derive probabilistic guarantees showing that higher-quality candidate views (as selected by our approach) are more likely to reduce uncertainty. Our experiments show that uncertainty quantification can make embodied 4D memory systems more reliable and more effective. In particular, on the OC-NaVQA benchmark, UQ-DAAAM achieves substantially larger uncertainty reduction and better spatio-temporal question answering performance than baselines.