INSPECT: Learning Robot View Selection from Assistant Use

Recently, end-to-end robotic manipulation models have gained significant attention for their generalizability and scalability. However, they often suffer from limited robustness to camera viewpoint changes when training with a fixed camera. In this paper, we propose VistaBot, a novel framework that integrates feed-forward geometric models with video diffusion models to achieve view-robust closed-loop manipulation without requiring camera calibration at test time. Our approach consists of three key components: 4D geometry estimation, view synthesis latent extraction, and latent action learning. VistaBot is integrated into both action-chunking (ACT) and diffusion-based ($π_0$) policies and evaluated across simulation and real-world tasks. We further introduce the View Generalization Score (VGS) as a new metric for comprehensive evaluation of cross-view generalization. Results show that VistaBot improves VGS by 2.79$\times$ and 2.63$\times$ over ACT and $π_0$, respectively, while also achieving high-quality novel view synthesis. Our contributions include a geometry-aware synthesis model, a latent action planner, a new benchmark metric, and extensive validation across diverse environments. The code and models will be made publicly available.

Robotic reward models evaluate task execution from visual observations, but their predictions can change with camera viewpoint and occlusion even when the underlying task state is unchanged. Adapting a pretrained reward model to a local task therefore requires accounting for how that task is observed. We introduce AnyviewMeter, a geometry-conditioned adaptation framework for robotic reward models that represent task progress as a scalar reward signal. It combines low-rank fine-tuning with token-aligned Plucker rays and synchronous block attention: ray conditioning incorporates camera geometry into visual features and attention queries and keys, while block attention fuses synchronized views inside the pretrained decoder. The framework supports both single-view reward prediction and joint multi-view evaluation through parameter-efficient adaptation of a pretrained Robometer model. On PickCube, single-view adaptation improves progress prediction in every camera group and reduces mean absolute error under a changed field of view by approximately 21% relative to RGB fine-tuning. Across simulated manipulation tasks, joint multi-view prediction reduces progress error by 41-69% compared with averaging single-view RGB predictions and improves temporal ordering in approximately 88% of task-camera groups. On real tasks with fixed and wrist-mounted cameras, mean absolute error decreases by approximately 21% relative to averaged RGB fine-tuning. These results support camera geometry and joint visual evidence as useful components of task-specific robotic reward adaptation.

Robots that store past experiences must select which one to reuse in a new scene. Most systems select by visual similarity, and most evaluations report only the success of the selected experience. That number does not show whether the selection was good: a rule can score well by repeatedly using one broadly transferable experience, or poorly because its preferred experience is weak. Since robots increasingly adapt by reuse rather than retraining, a score that describes the library rather than the rule misleads what the field builds next. We contribute an audit methodology: execute every stored experience in every query scene, over two manipulation tasks, three reuse mechanisms, and libraries of $K=3$, $10$, and $50$. Because every alternative's outcome is known, a score can be traced to per-scene selection or to library quality. The audited rules select by nearest-neighbor distance in five visual embeddings, from raw pixels to CLIP. (1) One fixed experience, chosen with hindsight, captures 30-58% of the gap between random selection and an oracle; per-scene selection competes for the remaining 0.07-0.15 in success rate. (2) At $K\ge10$, visual rules concentrate on one experience 1.5-3 times more than the oracle does, and their scores then follow that experience's quality. (3) Wherever a rule differs significantly from a shuffle that keeps its selection rates but pairs them with scenes at random, the rule is worse, for every learned image policy. (4) Visual distance predicts well whether a given pair will succeed (AUROC up to 0.96), yet ranks the candidates within one scene no better than chance for four of five embeddings at $K=50$ (AUROC 0.45-0.52). Exhaustive execution is usually infeasible, so the audit reduces to two cheap reports any study can give: the distribution of selected experiences, and the success of the best single experience in hindsight.