cs.LGSep 17, 2026

Ranking Competing geologic interpretations via foundation-model-assisted generative hydrologic inversion

Authors: Harun Ur Rashid, Daniel O'Malley

Read PDF
Ask AI
Cite

Copy citation

DOINot available for this paper

Abstract

High-consequence subsurface decisions often rely on sparse data that permit competing geological interpretations. Determining consistency of these interpretations with the available observations remains challenging. We present a workflow that addresses this challenge by translating competing geologic interpretations into alternative priors and ranking them according to their consistency with hydraulic-head observations. A key step in this workflow is exploiting the broad knowledge of image-generation foundation models to transform nuanced geologic interpretations into data ready for computer modeling. For each interpretation, a text-to-image foundation model generates an ensemble of geologic images, and a separately trained variational autoencoder learns an interpretation-specific latent representation. A supervised inverse network maps head observations into this latent space, and the frozen decoder reconstructs an image that is mapped to a log-conductivity field. Steady-state flow simulations predict heads, and the aggregate normalized head error determines the ranking. We evaluate the framework using a synthetic benchmark based on the Johansen Formation with three interpretations of decreasing consistency with the reference geology. Across 595 test cases, the Precise & Accurate interpretation produces lower normalized errors than Accurate in 58.5% of cases and Mismatched in 82.5% of cases. Accurate outperforms Mismatched in 65.5% of cases. We then compare spatial representations of two published conceptual models of the Culebra Dolomite Member at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. The revised representation yields an aggregate normalized error of 7.598, compared with 8.595 for the original, consistent with the documented conceptual-model revision. The framework enables quantitative comparison of competing geological interpretations using available hydraulic observations.

Explore similar work

CardsList
Jun 23, 2026cs.LG

What Do Language Priors Contribute to Darcy-Flow Inversion? A Mechanistic Audit

In ill-posed inverse problems, the recovered solution depends as much on the prior as on the data, yet much of the engineering knowledge that could serve as that prior is recorded qualitatively rather than in formal mathematical form. Here we test whether sentence embeddings can act as an inference-time interface for injecting geological descriptions into a learned Darcy-flow inverse solver. Across six synthetic geological classes and an exploratory transfer to a benchmark reservoir model (SPE10), we vary only the conditioning representation and find that text conditioning reduces reconstruction error by 81 % relative to a no-text counterfactual. Most of this gain comes from a categorical, class-level constraint whose value concentrates where the hydraulic head leaves the conductivity field underdetermined, while within-class geometric detail is secondary and pattern-dependent. Compared with a discrete class label, sentence embeddings add little dense-observation accuracy but improve training stability and enable paraphrase-based sensitivity analysis and open-vocabulary inputs. These results show that language priors can serve as an engineering-informatics interface for injecting geological knowledge into learned inverse solvers, while clarifying when they help and what signal they actually carry.
Taiga Saito, Yu Otake, Daijiro Mizutani +1
Ill-Posed Inverse ProblemGeological Semantic UnderstandingPrior KnowledgeEngineeringAlgorithm Auditing
AskPDF
May 13, 2026cs.LG

Mini-JEPA Foundation Model Fleet Enables Agentic Hydrologic Intelligence

Geospatial foundation models compress multispectral observations into dense embeddings increasingly used in natural-language environmental reasoning systems. A single planetary-scale model, e.g. Google AlphaEarth, handles broad characterization well but may compromise on specialized hydrologic signals. Such generalist models are also often inaccessible, expensive, and require large-scale compute. We propose Mini-JEPAs: a fleet of small sensor-specialized Joint Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) foundation models consulted by a routing agent for specialized questions. We pretrained five 22M-parameter Mini-JEPAs sharing an identical Vision Transformer backbone, JEPA recipe, and 64-d output space, using Sentinel-2 optical, Sentinel-1 SAR, MODIS thermal, multi-temporal Sentinel-2 phenology, and a topography-soil stack. Each Mini-JEPA reconstructs the variable matched to its sensor, with cross-validated R2R^2 reaching 0.97 for elevation, 0.97 for temperature, and 0.81 for precipitation. The five manifolds differ in geometric structure, with global participation ratios from 8.9 to 20.2 and local intrinsic dimensionalities from 2.3 to 9.0. Joint topography-soil and phenology models add predictive value beyond AlphaEarth alone for soil moisture, aridity, and precipitation (ΔR2ΔR^2 up to 0.031). A router LLM reads per-modality references and selects appropriate sensors with a perfect hit rate over a curated question set. In paired LLM-as-Judge evaluation, dual retrieval over AlphaEarth and the routed fleet outperforms AlphaEarth alone on physics-matched questions (Cohen's d=1.10d = 1.10, p=0.031p = 0.031). Locally-trained Mini-JEPAs can be operationalized for hydrologic intelligence with modest compute.
Mashrekur Rahman
Geospatial Foundation ModelsFundamental Hydrological PrinciplesSphere-JepaWireless Foundation ModelsSentinel-2Foundation Model
AskPDF
Aug 10, 2026cs.CL

Verifiably grounded machine interpretation of lunar geology

Planetary geology relies on historical, interpretive reasoning to reconstruct past events from diverse observations. Here, we present a step toward an automated "machine intelligence geologist" by embedding this distinct methodology of geologic knowledge discovery and inference into a multimodal vision-language architecture. Focusing on the stratigraphy of lunar basaltic mare volcanism, we train a model to generate verifiably grounded geologic interpretations directly from co-registered topographic, spectral, and geologic maps. We demonstrate that while the system successfully balances established geological priors with local visual evidence to accurately describe stratigraphy and terrain, numeric age dating derived solely from vision defaults to memorized priors. Integrating an open-book retrieval mechanism resolves this, enabling the model to faithfully cite published chronologies. Our findings delineate the necessary architecture for automated geologic inference: site evidence must be visually interpreted from local data, while quantitative historical context must be retrieved from the scientific record.
Tom Sander, Kay Wohlfarth, Christian Wöhler
Geological Semantic UnderstandingLunar SurfaceVisual EvidenceLarge Vision Language Models
AskPDF