When to Waddle: A Comparative Study of Bipedal Torso-Stabilization on Low-Friction Surfaces

LIPM is everywhere in legged-locomotion control, but almost always as a modeling choice rather than as something the controller's cost actually prefers. This note tries to make that link more explicit. Working from a small centroidal OCP that penalizes the rate of angular momentum, we look at what its optimum tends to look like. Three things come out. With full-rank stance, the optimum drifts toward a pendular force pattern at a rate determined by the SVD of the moment Jacobian; the constant is set by foot-span geometry and matches the experiments to within 16%. With N=2 stance, as in trot, the friction cone introduces a lower bound on $\|\dot{H}_G\|$ that no amount of weight tuning fixes; we also see a non-smooth feasibility kink at a critical horizontal acceleration that we can write in closed form. Adding a task term that asks for a nonzero $\dot{H}_G$ moves the optimum off the pendular set in a predictable way. None of this is far from the classical ZMP/DCM picture. We test these claims on a point-mass quadruped and on the Unitree Go1 in MuJoCo (open-loop QP and a torque-level closed-loop controller), and we note where the asymptotic story stops being a good description of what the closed loop actually does.

Learning-based quadrupedal locomotion typically relies on complex reward formulations that entangle task specification, operational limits, gait preference, and terrain adaptation within a single optimization objective. We instead treat these functions through distinct mechanisms: rewards for task specification, constraints for operational limits, energy minimization for gait preference, and exteroceptive perception for adapting energy use to terrain difficulty. We show that these components jointly enable efficient, terrain-adaptive locomotion, and that removing each component exposes a distinct failure mode. Our formulation removes explicit gait priors (including air-time, contact-count, and foot-clearance targets) in favor of emergent behavior. Compared to a conventional complex-reward baseline, our formulation achieves comparable terrain traversal while reducing cost of transport by 56% and operational-limit violations by 96%. The resulting policies transfer zero-shot to a physical Unitree Go2 using LiDAR-based elevation mapping. Project website with videos: https://tinyurl.com/locomposition.

Bipedal robots are challenging to control because they operate close to instability, where small variations in foot-terrain contact can rapidly destabilize locomotion. On rigid terrain, bipedal robots mitigate this fragility by using well-established contact mechanics and control strategies. On flowable surfaces such as granular slopes, foot contact can induce large surface deformations and solid-fluid-like transitions, coupling terrain effects with robot dynamics, leading to underperformance or failure. This is partly due to the lack of reliable methods to represent the dynamics of flowable terrain, making it difficult to account for terrain effects in locomotion design. Here, we investigate how controlling terrain response can improve bipedal locomotion on granular slopes by studying the terradynamics of cleated feet, thin plates emanating from the foot soles. Systematic studies of a small-scale (1.4 kg) robophysical biped reveal that cleats with sparse and dense spacing lead to excessive terrain yielding and resistance, respectively, degrading performance and leading to failure. An intermediate cleat spacing distributes interaction forces to maintain substrate stresses near (or below) the yield threshold, enabling walking on granular slopes up to 30 degrees. Guided by these principles, we design a foot that actively adjusts cleat depth and accommodates both rigid and granular terrain. We also demonstrate that the principles of effective foot-terrain interaction translate to a larger (15 kg) autonomous biped. Our study presents an alternative to conventional body-centric robot control approaches, which regulate terrain-induced effects through body motion, by instead regulating terrain interactions through limb-centric approach.