Organizations: AI for Good (AIGO), Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Liguria, Italy · DITEN, University of Genoa, Genoa, Liguria, Italy · Department of Computer Science, University of Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy · Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA · Department of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA · NUS Artificial Intelligence Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore · Siebel School of Computing and Data Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA · Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA · Keiji AI, Seattle, Washington, USA · National Institute of Health Data Science, Peking University, Beijing, China · Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Peking University, Beijing, China · Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, College of Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Medical time series (MedTS), including electrocardiograms (ECG), electroencephalograms (EEG), photoplethysmography (PPG), and vital-sign recordings, are central to clinical diagnosis and health monitoring. As large language models (LLMs) have advanced, a growing body of work has examined how their reasoning, generation, and knowledge-integration capabilities can support MedTS analysis. Yet existing studies remain scattered, and the field still lacks a clear view of how these models should be designed, integrated into clinical workflows, and evaluated. This review synthesizes recent work on large language models for medical time series analysis (MedTSLLMs), covering both methodological progress and issues related to real-world deployment. We review model architectures, data resources, and processing pipelines, and prompt design strategies adapted for diverse clinical scenarios. We further organize existing MedTS applications, ranging from diagnostic interpretation and report generation to longitudinal health monitoring and physiological signal synthesis, highlighting task-specific design choices, common evaluation protocols, and empirical findings reported across studies. By bringing together current practices and open challenges, this review aims to provide a clearer foundation for developing, evaluating, and deploying MedTSLLMs responsibly in healthcare. We also maintain a regularly updated list of MedTSLLM studies and resources at: https://github.com/hy727/MedTSLLM-Review.
Figures & tables
Review
Focus
Multimodal Integration
Architecture
Pipeline
LLM Role
Prompt Design
Evaluation Protocol
Clinical Guidance
Task Scope
Zhou et al. [ 266 ]
Medicine
✓
✓
✓
×
×
✓
✓
D+G+H
Ansari et al. [ 8 ]
ECG
✓
✓
×
×
×
✓
×
D+G
Khan et al. [ 98 ]
ECG
✓
✓
×
✓
×
×
✓
D+G
Babu et al. [ 12 ]
EEG
✓
✓
×
✓
×
×
×
D+G+S
Arava et al. [ 10 ]
Wearable
✓
×
✓
✓
×
✓
✓
G+H
Ding et al. [ 46 ]
MedTS
×
✓
×
×
×
×
×
D+G+H+S
Table 1: Comparison of our review with existing review papers in LLM for biosignals. Abbreviation: MedTS: medical time series. D: diagnosis. G: generation. H: health monitoring. S: medical time-series synthesis.
Figure 1: Overview of MedTSLLM workflow. Here we outline the workflow of MedTSLLMs from multi-source MedTS acquisition and signal streams to LLM-based pipeline, knowledge integration, and downstream clinical applications.
Strengths: Bidirectional contextual modeling and efficient representation learning. Limitations: Limited generation and instruction-following capabilities; task-specific heads are often required.
ClinicalBERT [ 169 ]
∼ 110M
880M words
BiolinkBERT [ 246 ]
∼ 110M/333M
21GB text
BEiT [ 14 ]
86M/304M
14M images
Ada-v2 [ 162 ]
-
-
ViLT [ 103 ]
∼ 87M
5.1M image-text pairs
Table 2: Summary of the LLMs used in existing MedTS studies, including their underlying structures, numbers of parameters, pre-training data scales, representative applications, and key strengths and limitations. Column “# Params” denotes the number of parameters. Abbreviations: K: thousand; M: million; B: billion; T: trillion; GB: gigabyte; IFT: instruction fine-tuning data.
Paradigm
Parameter size
Computational Cost
Data Requirements
Key Strengths & Limitations
Representative Applications
SFT
Large
High
Task-specific labeled signal-text pairs
Strengths: Strong task specialization. Limitations: Data-intensive and prone to overfitting on limited datasets.
Strengths: Strong instruction following and controllable outputs. Limitations: Sensitive to instruction quality and coverage.
Medical QA; Health assessment; Clinical report generation
PEFT
Small
Low
SFT/IFT data
Strengths: Compute- and memory-efficient. Limitations: Limited adaptation capacity and configuration-sensitive.
Medical QA; EEG-to-text translation; Clinical report generation
Table 3: Comparison of common fine-tuning paradigms for MedTSLLMs in terms of trainable parameter size, computational cost, data requirements, key strengths and limitations, and representative applications.
Figure 2: Diagram of the prompt templates used in MedTSLLM studies. Here we take ECG-based arrhythmia diagnosis as an example to show how to design a prompt template under different prompt settings. Due to the space limitation, we use some abbreviations in this figure. Abbreviations: MedTS: medical time-series. TS: time-series. AFib: atrial fibrillation. PAC: premature atrial contractions. PVC: premature ventricular contractions. HC: healthy control. User: user profile. Q: question. DK: domain knowledge. To help readers assess the maturity and current adoption of different prompt designs, we report the number of representative studies using each template in the surveyed literature: Type 1: Basic Prompt Template ( n=10 ), Type 2: User-Profile Augmented Template ( n=9 ), Type 3: Domain Knowledge-Enhanced Template ( n=11 ), Type 4: Retrieval-Augmented Generation Template ( n=3 ), Type 5: Label-Injected Template ( n=5 ), and Type 6: Soft Embedding Learnable Template ( n=2 ).
Figure 3: Integrated overview of potential applications of MedTSLLMs. Here, we briefly present six main applications of MedTSLLMs and outline their frameworks and key components of MedTSLLMs in different clinical scenarios. Abbreviations: AF: atrial fibrillation. STEMI: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. HCM: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. HTN: hypertension. BP: blood pressure. HR: heart rate.
The rise of large language models (LLMs) has shifted time series analysis from narrow analytics to general-purpose reasoning. Yet, existing benchmarks cover only a small set of health time series modalities and tasks, failing to reflect the diverse domains and extensive temporal dependencies inherent in real-world physiological modeling. To bridge these gaps, we introduce HEARTS (Health Reasoning over Time Series), a unified benchmark for evaluating hierarchical reasoning capabilities of LLMs over general health time series. HEARTS integrates 16 real-world datasets across 12 health domains and 20 signal modalities, and defines a comprehensive taxonomy of 110 tasks grouped into four core capabilities: Perception, Inference, Generation, and Deduction. Evaluating 16 state-of-the-art LLMs on more than 20K test samples reveals intriguing findings. First, LLMs substantially underperform specialized models, and their performance is only weakly related to general reasoning scores. Moreover, LLMs often rely on simple heuristics and struggle with multi-step temporal reasoning. Finally, performance declines with increasing temporal complexity, with similar failure modes within model families, indicating that scaling alone is insufficient. By making these gaps measurable, HEARTS provides a standardized testbed and living benchmark for developing next-generation LLM agents capable of reasoning over diverse health signals.
Sirui Li, Shuhan Xiao, Mihir Joshi +4
University of California, Los Angeles, 2Google Research · 2Google Research
While multimodal large language models (MLLMs) excel in medical applications, most of them favor static images or short-term signals. In the critical field of dynamic electrocardiograms (ECG), models struggle with complex temporal reasoning and diagnostic report generation due to a lack of high-quality datasets and benchmarks. To address this, we introduce (i) Holtercare-23K, a large-scale multimodal dynamic ECG dataset comprising 22,980 QA pairs derived from 788 clinical Holter records and featuring a novel signal-video-text tri-modal alignment. Based on this dataset, we present (ii) Holtercare-Bench, a multimodal benchmark that evaluates models on temporal localization, clinical diagnosis, and global summarization. Zero-shot evaluations of leading MLLMs reveal a significant performance gap in processing ultra-long pathological sequences. However, fine-tuning representative models yields substantial improvements. This work illuminates the limitations of current MLLMs in electrophysiology and provides a foundational benchmark for long-term medical MLLMs. Our project is available at https://github.com/ZJU4HealthCare/Holtercare-Bench.
Yihan Xie, Hanwen Cui, Runze Ye +8
Zhejiang University · Beijing Institute of Technology · University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Medical time series (MedTS) signals such as electroencephalography (EEG) and electrocardiography (ECG) support many clinical applications. However, substantial subject-level heterogeneity often induces subject-level distribution shift, causing a fixed parameter set to generalize poorly to unseen individuals. Compared with domain adaptation methods that often depend on extra adaptation components or target-batch statistics, Test-Time Training (TTT) provides a more practical solution for sequential clinical data by enabling online adaptation from unlabeled test samples. However, many representative TTT methods require iterative inner-loop optimization, increasing test-time overhead. In this paper, we propose MedTS-TTT, a test-time training framework for medical time series modeling. MedTS-TTT is built upon Closed-Loop Self-Alignment Test-Time Training (CLSA-TTT) and a Gated Convolutional Backbone (GCB). CLSA-TTT constructs a token-level self-supervised target and performs a single-step fast-weight update for intra-layer closed-loop alignment, enabling rapid sample-wise adaptation without iterative inner-loop optimization. GCB combines CLSA-TTT-based fast adaptation and token-level fusion with a gated convolutional branch to balance local dynamic modeling and information-flow control. On 4 public datasets (2 EEG and 2 ECG) with subject-independent splits, MedTS-TTT achieves 11 top-1 rankings out of 12 evaluations across 9 baselines and 3 metrics. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/mingzhi-c/MedTS-TTT.
Mingzhi Chen, Yiyu Gui, Guibo Luo
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ultra High Definition Immersive Media Technology, Shenzhen Graduate School, Peking University, Shenzhen, China