Building Trustworthy Mental Health Benchmarks on Bluesky: A Validation-Aware Weak-Supervision Framework
Authors: Gaurab Chhetri, Anandi Dutta, Subasish Das
Organizations: Department of Computer Science Texas State University San Marcos, Texas, USA · Ingram School of Engineering Texas State University San Marcos, Texas, USA
Decentralized social media platforms create new opportunities and challenges for computational mental health research because data access, moderation, labeling, and deployment responsibilities are distributed across multiple technical and governance layers. This paper presents a validation-aware weak-supervision system for constructing and evaluating suicidal ideation (SI) and broader mental health (MH) disclosure benchmarks on Bluesky, a decentralized social media platform built on the AT Protocol. The system integrates public firehose collection, task-specific lexicon filtering, Llama-3-8B-assisted binary annotation, human-adjudicated validation subsets, and transformer-based model benchmarking. Using this pipeline, we construct two task-specific corpora containing 8,346 SI-labeled posts and 9,988 MH-labeled posts. The evaluation shows that model performance depends strongly on both task definition and validation protocol. BERT+LSTM achieves the highest SI stratified cross-validation F1-score, RoBERTa achieves the strongest SI holdout F1-score, and DistilRoBERTa achieves the best MH cross-validation F1-score. Human validation reveals different weak-label failure modes across tasks, with SI labels dominated by false negatives and MH labels dominated by false positives. These findings show that decentralized social media can support reproducible mental health benchmarking, but only when system design, label provenance, validation strategy, and deployment constraints are evaluated together.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: System architecture for validation-aware weak-supervision benchmarking on Bluesky.
Figure 2Figure 3
Measure
SI
MH
Validation sample
276
250
Human-human Cohen’s ( κ )
0.762
0.595
LLM-human observed agreement
88.8%
55.6%
LLM-human Cohen’s ( κ )
0.636
0.222
LLM-human precision
0.947
0.276
LLM-human recall
0.554
0.977
Table 1: Human validation of LLM-assisted weak labels.
Category
Positive examples in scope
Excluded cases
SI
First-person desire to die, passive death wish, current self-harm ideation, planning language, or recent self-directed suicidal intent.
News about suicide, advocacy posts, condolences, quotations, jokes, hypotheticals, and third-person discussion without self-directed ideation.
MH
First-person disclosure of depression, anxiety, panic, hopelessness, distress-related insomnia, help-seeking, or self-harm-related distress.
General awareness posts, clinical information sharing, political commentary, metaphors, sarcasm, and statements about another person’s mental health.
Ambiguous content
Labeled positive only when self-directed disclosure was explicit enough to support the task definition.
Labeled negative when context was insufficient, quoted, purely rhetorical, or not attributable to the author.
Table 2: Annotation boundary rules used for human validation.
Design element
SI
MH
Primary validation
Holdout + CV
5-fold CV
Optimization metric
F1
F1
Model emphasis
broad architecture set
compact encoders
Transformer epochs
3
up to 5
Early stopping
hybrid models
all models
Train batch size
16
8
Table 3: Task-specific evaluation design.
Property
SI
MH
Collection window
14 days
2 months
Labeled posts
8,346
9,988
Positive posts
2,180
4,793
Negative posts
6,166
5,195
Positive rate
26.1%
48.0%
Unique users
6,648
not reported
Table 4: Dataset summary for the two Bluesky benchmarks.
Model
Accuracy
Precision
Recall
F1
Train time (s)
RoBERTa-base
0.892
0.799
0.784
0.792
841
ELECTRA-base
0.891
0.813
0.757
0.784
834
ALBERT-base-v2
0.886
0.789
0.768
0.778
908
BERT-base
0.883
0.785
0.763
0.774
835
DistilBERT-base
0.883
0.780
0.766
0.773
423
XLNet-base
0.884
0.797
0.745
0.770
1359
Table 5: SI holdout validation performance.
Model
Stratified 5-fold
Repeated 5-fold
Mean F1
SD
Mean F1
SD
BERT+LSTM
0.9162
0.007
0.9148
0.009
RoBERTa-base
0.9017
0.012
0.9024
0.010
BERT-base
0.8986
0.006
0.8993
0.010
XLNet-base
0.8904
0.008
0.8896
0.014
ELECTRA-base
0.8863
0.006
0.8860
0.016
Table 6: SI cross-validation performance.
Figure 2: SI holdout F1 versus stratified cross-validation F1.
Figure 3: SI efficiency summary. Bars show holdout F1; right-side labels report F1, training time, and recall for every model.
The growing availability of online support groups has opened up new windows to study mental health through natural language processing (NLP). However, it is hindered by a lack of high-quality, well-validated datasets. Existing studies have a tendency to build task-specific corpora without collecting them into widely available resources, and this makes reproducibility as well as cross-task comparison challenging. In this paper, we present a uniform benchmark set of four Reddit-based datasets for disjoint but complementary tasks: (i) detection of suicidal ideation, (ii) binary general mental disorder detection, (iii) bipolar disorder detection, and (iv) multi-class mental disorder classification. All datasets were established upon diligent linguistic inspection, well-defined annotation guidelines, and human-judgmental verification. Inter-annotator agreement metrics always exceeded the baseline agreement score of 0.8, ensuring the labels' trustworthiness. Previous work's evidence of performance on both transformer and contextualized recurrent models demonstrates that these models receive excellent performances on tasks (F1 ~ 93-99%), further validating the usefulness of the datasets. By combining these resources, we establish a unifying foundation for reproducible mental health NLP studies with the ability to carry out cross-task benchmarking, multi-task learning, and fair model comparison. The presented benchmark suite provides the research community with an easy-to-access and varied resource for advancing computational approaches toward mental health research.
General-purpose health benchmarks increasingly anchor claims about LLM medical performance, but they are not always resolved by clinical specialty, making domain-specific performance hard to isolate. Mental health is of acute public-health concern as millions of people turn to LLMs for psychological support, and most existing evaluations are bespoke academic benchmarks that are difficult to integrate into developer workflows. We introduce HealthBench-Psych and HealthBench-Psych-Hard. We screened HealthBench's 5,000 physician-rubric conversations for mental-health relevance with a transparent LLM-applied rubric, then validated the subset through two rounds of blinded clinician review with concealed known-exclude controls, yielding 610 conversations (12.2% of the corpus). Evaluating 20 frontier and open models under a cross-vendor panel of three LLM judges, we find a statistically tied frontier cluster, measurable refusal behavior in two models, and near-identical rankings across judges (τ≥0.92). We release the subset, pipeline, model responses, grades, and analysis code as a reusable resource.
Matthew Flathers, Phuong Anh Nguyen, Jill Noorily +7
Division of Digital Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA · Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
Social media text data are often used to train Machine Learning (ML) models to identify users exhibiting high-risk mental health behaviors. However, sharing this sensitive data poses privacy risks and limits the growth of benchmark datasets. We comprehensively evaluate whether privacy-preserving ML techniques can enable safer data sharing while preserving performance. Specifically, we apply federated learning (FL) and Differentially Private FL for two widely-studied mental health prediction tasks: depression detection on X (Twitter) and suicide crisis detection on Reddit. We simulate realistic data-sharing scenarios by treating each user as a client in a non-IID setting, evaluating across different client fractions, aggregation strategies, and privacy budgets. While FL achieves comparable performance to centralized training (centralized F1 = 85.63; best FL model F1 = 83.16) on depression identification, we find that Differentially Private FL has a large performance-privacy trade-off (up to F1 = 27.01 drop) even with low levels of noise (epsilon = 50). This is due to the distortion of highly informative yet sparse mental health linguistic markers related to mental health, like health topics and emotion words. This research empirically demonstrates the potential and limitations of current privacy preservation techniques for mental health inference tasks.
Nuredin Ali Abdelkadir, Anjali Ratnam, Zeerak Talat +1