Transferring the Intelligence of VLMs to Robotic Control
Organizations: Tsinghua University · Tencent Hunyuan
Abstract
Humans can seamlessly adapt to both physical and digital worlds, suggesting that while a digital-to-real gap exists in embodiment, environment and task, human intelligence itself may transfer across this gap. This naturally raises a fundamental question: can the intelligence of vision-language models (VLMs) similarly generalize from the digital world to the physical world for robotic control? We investigate this question through RoboDawn, a human-intuitive interface that exposes robotic control to an agentic VLM through a compact set of discrete translation, rotation, and gripper commands. Using this interface, the VLM controls a robot in a closed loop: it observes the current visual state, reasons about the next action, executes it, and adapts subsequent decisions to the resulting state. Furthermore, we introduce an in-context learning (ICL) scheme that uses a few demonstrations to ground the VLM in both interface usage and task-solving strategies. Experiments on RoboTwin 2.0 C2R and RoboDojo demonstrate that RoboDawn achieves strong performance without task-specific robot training. In the zero-shot setting, RoboDawn outperforms several strong policies trained on benchmarkspecific robot data, while a single in-context demonstration further yields substantial performance gains and establishes state-of-the-art (SOTA) results. On RoboTwin 2.0 C2R, the success rate increases from 53.2% zero-shot to 73.6% one-shot, exceeding the solid baseline π0.5 (46.0%). Similar gains are observed on RoboDojo, where success rate improves from 35.67% zero-shot to 47.17% one-shot. The same framework also transfers to real-world robots, performing block-in-basket and block stacking on Franka.
Figures & tables
| Method | Number of Shots | Success rate (%) |
|---|---|---|
| FastWAM Yuan et al. (2026) | Full Set | 1.9 |
| StarVLA Community (2026) | Full Set | 10.6 |
| GalaxeaVLA Jiang et al. (2025) | Full Set | 12.7 |
| Xiaomi-Robotics-0 Cai et al. (2026) | Full Set | 18.2 |
| GR00T-1.7 Bjorck et al. (2025) | Full Set | 20.7 |
| X-VLA Zheng et al. (2025) | Full Set | 20.9 |
| Method | # Shots | Score | Success rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LingBot-VLA Wu et al. (2026) | Full Set | 5.50 | 2.96 |
| X-VLA Zheng et al. (2025) | Full Set | 10.13 | 6.52 |
| Intelligence et al. (2025) | Full Set | 11.41 | 6.91 |
| Hy-Embodied-0.5-VLA Zhang et al. (2026a) | Full Set | 13.07 | 8.80 |
| Xiaomi-Robotics-1 Team et al. (2026b) | Full Set | 20.07 | 13.93 |
| GalaxeaVLA (G0.5) Liu et al. (2026a) | Full Set | 20.23 | 14.88 |
| Block in Basket (Franka) | Block Stacking (Franka) | Cloth Folding (Piper) | |
| Success Rate | 9/10 | 5/10 | 0/10 |
VLMs for Robotics
Vision-language models for robotics connect visual and linguistic understanding to grounded navigation, manipulation, and robot control.
See all 657 papers