MCPGen: Benchmarking LLMs on Executable MCPWorkflow Development

Large Language Model (LLM) agents increasingly interact with external systems through tool-calling protocols such as the Model Context Protocol (MCP). In prevailing architectures, the agent must reason about every tool invocation in every session, consuming tokens proportional to the number of actions performed--even when the task has been solved before. We present the MCP Workflow Engine, a novel MCP-native orchestration layer that decouples intelligence (deciding what to do) from execution (carrying it out). An agent reasons once to produce a declarative workflow blueprint--a JSON document specifying a directed sequence of MCP tool calls with parameterized templates, loops, parallel branches, and data piping. Subsequent executions are triggered by a single run_workflow tool call, consuming one invocation's worth of tokens regardless of the blueprint's internal complexity. We formalize the MCP Mediator architectural pattern--an MCP server that simultaneously acts as a client to downstream MCP servers--and implement it in TypeScript against the MCP SDK. We evaluate the engine on a production-scale Kubernetes CMDB synchronization task spanning 67 orchestrated steps across 2 MCP servers, 38 namespaces, 13 worker nodes, and 22 distinct resource types. The engine reduces per-execution token cost by over 99%, completes the full cluster graph--comprising 1,200+ nodes and 2,800+ relationships across 20 relationship types--in under 45 seconds, and achieves deterministic, idempotent execution with zero agent involvement at run time.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly serving as autonomous agents, and their utilization of external tools via the Model Context Protocol (MCP) is considered a future trend. Current MCP evaluation sets suffer from issues such as reliance on external MCP services and a lack of difficulty awareness. To address these limitations, we propose MCPAgentBench, a benchmark based on real-world MCP definitions designed to evaluate the tool-use capabilities of agents. We construct a dataset containing authentic tasks and simulated MCP tools. The evaluation employs a dynamic sandbox environment that presents agents with candidate tool lists containing distractors, thereby testing their tool selection and discrimination abilities. Furthermore, we introduce comprehensive metrics to measure both task completion rates and execution efficiency. Experiments conducted on state-of-the-art LLMs reveal significant performance differences in handling complex, multi-step tool invocations. All code is open-source at https://github.com/Brunestuder/MCPAgentBench.

Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed over Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, yet the benchmarks used to evaluate them score the final answer or a fixed "ground-truth" list of tools, both of which are fragile once the underlying data is live and stateful. We present DynamicMCPBench, a reusable framework rather than a fixed dataset. A practitioner can run it on their own MCP servers to test models on their own tasks, or let it collect servers automatically to measure a model's general ability to solve agentic tasks. Given the servers and any set of models, it generates realistic goals, pursues each one live to record a successful trajectory, distills that trajectory into path-agnostic effect checkpoints, and scores an agent on whether it reproduces those effects, never on the final answer. To show what the framework reveals, we run it at scale: 24 models over 121 servers and 750 tasks spread evenly over 15 task categories (50 each), where each category targets a distinct tool-use challenge of the generated questions. Each task is scored by pass^3: it counts as solved only if all three independent attempts succeed. Even the strongest agents solve only about half of the tasks, 31% of tasks are solved by no model at all, and accuracy collapses as the required tool chain grows longer (from 39% on the shortest chains to 13% on the longest). A human validation study confirms the automatic scoring is reliable (chance-corrected agreement of 0.76). DynamicMCPBench thus turns benchmark construction into something practitioners can rerun on their own servers and models, while exposing a consistent inability of current agents to handle long, multi-step agentic tasks.