As Large Language Model (LLM) agents are applied in continuously interactive environments, driving the evolution of their own capabilities becomes a core problem for achieving long-term autonomy. Currently, environmental knowledge is typically treated as an external fixed input rather than as part of the agent's ongoing evolution. Reinforcement learning methods usually optimize policies through environmental interaction but tend to adapt only to fixed task distributions or single environments. This paper proposes TTSE (Two-Track Self-Evolution), a dual-track online self-evolution framework that separates evolving knowledge into FACT (environmental facts, whose reliability is continuously verified through interaction evidence) and TIP (task-conditioned implementation procedures). From a decision-theoretic perspective, we decompose the agent's excess risk into environment-representation regret and conditional-execution regret, characterize the conditions under which environment-conditioned policies strictly outperform condition-agnostic policies, and bound the downstream risk in terms of FACT identification error and cross-condition mismatch cost. In practice, TTSE's ablation experiments on GDPevo validate the advantage of dual-track evolution. On the classic agent task benchmarks ALFWorld and ScienceWorld, TTSE further demonstrates superior task adaptation. Moreover, TTSE is broadly compatible with existing skill self-evolution methods; combined with the Bayesian-Agent algorithm, a single-track ablation validates the dual-track advantage, substantially improving the aggregate score across the five major domains of SOPBench over three independent repetitions. Finally, on the real end-to-end task benchmark PinchBench, TTSE is integrated into a general agent framework via retrieval-based injection and stably outperforms the baseline across three independent runs.
Agent self-evolution in long-horizon LLM systems is largely procedural: useful experience is not merely stored information, but reusable procedures for searching, debugging, and verification. Yet current evaluations do not isolate this form of transfer. Agent benchmarks test single-episode task solving; memory benchmarks target information retention rather than procedural reuse. We introduce EvoAgentBench, a benchmark for agent self-evolution via Ability-guided transfer across four agentic domains: web research, algorithmic reasoning, software engineering, and knowledge work. EvoAgentBench extracts trace-grounded Abilities from agent executions, canonicalizes them into operational units, and builds domain-specific Ability Graphs linking tasks that share procedural overlap. By design, every test task is backed by verified training-side Ability support. Across a 528/267 train/test split, two scaffolds, and three backbones, curated Ability content transfers reliably across model families, but no current automatic method sustains positive gain in all settings. EvoAgentBench shifts self-evolution evaluation from aggregate accuracy comparison to fine-grained diagnosis of experience encoding, routing, and uptake. The benchmark is publicly available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/EverMind-AI/EvoAgentBench.
Large language model agents increasingly operate in dynamic environments where tool interfaces, APIs, and user requirements change after deployment. Existing self-evolution methods mainly follow two paradigms: harness-based approaches, which externalize feedback into editable memories or skills for rapid adaptation, and parameter-based approaches, which internalize experience into model parameters for deeper capability improvement. However, using either mechanism alone creates a trade-off between flexibility and performance. This paper asks how an agent can coordinate both channels to achieve robust self-evolution. We present COVE, a unified agent self-evolution framework that combines harness-based and parameter-based learning through task-aware routing, stage-aware scheduling, and knowledge optimization. Through this design, COVE treats self-evolution not as indiscriminate accumulation of experience, but as a coordinated process that matches tasks and knowledge types to appropriate learning mechanisms. Experiments across multiple task categories show that COVE outperforms single-channel evolution strategies, demonstrating more robust and efficient improvement under changing environments.
Although Large Language Model (LLM) agents have demonstrated strong performance on complex tasks, their learning is often limited by inefficient interaction feedback and static training environments, which hinder broader generalization. To address these limitations, this paper introduces Role-Agent, \textcolor{black}{a framework} that harnesses a single LLM to function concurrently as both the agent and the environment, enabling a bootstrapped co-evolution. Role-Agent comprises two synergistic components: World-In-Agent (WIA) and Agent-In-World (AIW). In WIA, the LLM acts as the agent and predicts future states after each action; the alignment between predicted and actual states is then used as a process reward, encouraging environment-aware reasoning. In AIW, the LLM analyzes failure modes from failed trajectories and retrieves tasks with similar failure patterns, thereby reshaping the training data distribution for targeted practice. Experiments on multiple benchmarks show that Role-Agent consistently improves performance, yielding an average gain of over 4% over strong baselines.