ToneCL: Contrastive Learning for Few-Shot Syllable-Level Tone Classification

Tonal low-resource languages are widely spoken but remain underserved by modern speech technologies. A central challenge is learning speech representations that are robust to nuisance variation, such as speaker gender, while preserving lexical tone, which carries word meaning. We propose SITA, a lightweight adaptation recipe for pretrained wav2vec-style self-supervised speech encoders. Rather than designing a new backbone or objective, SITA combines existing objectives in a staged optimization framework to reduce tone collapse while preserving ASR capability. Stage 1 improves speaker invariance without erasing tonal contrasts by combining a cross-gender contrastive loss with a tone-repulsive loss that separates same-word, different-tone realizations. Stage 2 restores recognition-oriented linguistic information through CTC fine-tuning and knowledge distillation on upper encoder layers. We evaluate SITA primarily on Hmong, a tonal language with limited digital resources and a small speaker pool. Against multilingual, speaker-adversarial, label-aware, and semi-supervised baselines, SITA achieves the best trade-off between cross-gender lexical retrieval and tone separation, while maintaining ASR accuracy close to an ASR-adapted XLS-R teacher. Results on Mandarin show consistent gains, suggesting that SITA is a general plug-in recipe for tonal speech representation learning.

In Yorùbá, pitch alone separates \d{o}k\d{o} (husband, Mid), \d{o}k\d{ò} (vehicle, Low), and \d{o}k\d{ó} (hoe, High) -- the diacritics ARE the tone marks. Yet character error rate (CER), the standard automated metric for text-to-speech (TTS), is in practice computed from ASR output that drops those marks: a synthesizer can ace CER and still say vehicle for husband. We introduce DunDun -- named for the dùndún, the Yorùbá talking drum that speaks through pitch alone -- an automated, reference-free lexical-tone metric that needs no tone-labelled corpus. The gold High/Mid/Low sequence is read from the input text's diacritics (in TTS that text exists by construction, so no reference recording is needed); the prediction comes from the audio's pitch track. We validate three ways. Flattening pitch with PSOLA resynthesis collapses DunDun while CER does not move. Inverting High and Low in the answer key of 300 native recordings drives the two-class readout to 0.14, symmetrically below its 0.35 chance level -- a consistency check on the scoring path, not independent evidence. And three native listeners, over 67 blind A/B trials, pick the tone-correct clip 89.6% of the time (95% CI 80.0-94.8; p < 1e-4); whether DunDun tracks those judgements trial by trial is not resolved at this sample size. Applied to a massively multilingual zero-shot TTS model, DunDun shows what CER cannot: Yorùbá tone sits near the native anchor before any Yorùbá fine-tuning (0.567 +/- 0.02 over five decode seeds vs. 0.596; chance 0.33), despite the 21.4% CER the model's own paper reports; and a few hours of clean audio halve CER (5.6% to 2.7% by 5h, 1.7% by 15h) while tone saturates within the hour. On non-tonal Swahili, CER already captures the gains: the metric a language needs is language-dependent. We release the metric and the complete validation protocol.

Neural TTS systems can sound natural across languages, but naturalness does not guarantee the preservation of sound contrasts that distinguish words from their grammatical forms. Standard metrics like MOS do not test for this. We propose a classifier-based framework that audits TTS output against language-specific phonological patterns using human speech as a benchmark. Testing Assamese advanced tongue root (ATR) vowel harmony with Meta's MMS TTS, we show that a classifier trained on human speech transfers to synthesized speech with minimal loss. The faithfulness audit reveals that [+ATR] mid vowels are realized as [-ATR] in 1/3 tokens despite an underlying [+ATR] specification, a bias absent in human speech. At the word level, predicted ATR labels classify harmony more accurately than transcription labels, indicating a gap between intended and produced phonology. The framework offers task-specific diagnostics and generalizes to other phonological contrasts with measurable acoustic cues.