Abstract
Shared control often allocates robot authority based on confidence in inferred human intent, assuming reliable autonomous execution. When this assumption fails, high intent confidence can cause over-helping. We present a capability-aware shared-control framework in which a vision-language model (VLM) infers human intent and provides semantic-intent confidence, while a vision-language-action (VLA) policy generates autonomous actions. VLA capability confidence is estimated online from the dispersion and local instability of stochastic action trajectories. We design a nonlinear arbitration policy that combines Bayesian-filtered semantic-intent confidence with VLA capability confidence through a sigmoid mapping to adapt robot authority. Our evaluation combined VLM/VLA confidence assessment with a study involving 12 participants performing pick-and-place and bidirectional stacking under in-distribution and out-of-distribution conditions. The proposed method achieved the highest task success rate (92%), compared with manual teleoperation (83%), intent-only arbitration (44%), and fixed equal-weight blending (10%). It also achieved higher control friendliness and lower authority-weighted disagreement than both shared-control baselines. These results demonstrate the benefit of incorporating VLA capability into authority allocation to mitigate over-helping and improve shared-control performance.
Explore similar work
Jun 14, 2026cs.RO
Recent advancements in Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have demonstrated impressive generalist capabilities in robot manipulation, yet these policies can be brittle under out-of-distribution spatial and semantic perturbations. While human teleoperation offers reliable recovery, it can demand high cognitive load and precise manual control, and existing policy steering methods often require auxiliary models or sampler modifications. In this work, we introduce Shared Autonomy for Policy Steering (SAPS), a framework that blends real-time human teleoperation commands with pretrained policy actions at the action level. SAPS requires no policy retraining, auxiliary dynamics models, or architectural modifications. We propose and evaluate three arbitration strategies to balance human and VLA policy control, including a dynamic Cosine-similarity arbitration strategy that computes the geometric agreement between human and policy actions. Across evaluations in simulation (LIBERO, LIBERO-PRO, CALVIN) and on real-world robot hardware, SAPS improves task success rates over autonomous execution by up to 82% in both simulation and the real world. Furthermore, our approach drastically reduces human intervention compared to pure teleoperation, while simultaneously achieving faster task completion times than both autonomous execution and pure teleoperation. These results demonstrate that action-level shared autonomy is a practical, model-agnostic approach for reliably deploying generalist robot policies in real-world contexts involving a human operator,with promising applications in assistive teleoperation and scalable data collection.
Crystal Zhou, Jehan Yang, Douglas J. Weber +1
Jun 29, 2026cs.RO
Shared autonomy systems combine user input with autonomous assistance to help users with motor impairments control robot arms to perform everyday manipulation tasks, by inferring user goals and providing appropriate guidance. However, the robot's internal beliefs about user goals cannot be observed by users. Traditional shared autonomy systems provide assistance along efficient shortest paths toward inferred goals, but when multiple objects lie in similar directions, such assistive motion remains ambiguous and fails to reveal the specific goal identified by the robot. This creates two critical problems. First, when the robot correctly infers the goal, users continue controlling because they cannot perceive understanding from ambiguous assistive motion, wasting effort when autonomous completion would suffice. Second, when the robot misunderstands intent, users cannot quickly detect errors until assistive motion diverges significantly, requiring substantial corrective input. We address this by introducing legible motion into shared autonomy, where robot actions must both advance toward the goal and clearly reveal which goal has been inferred, enabling users to understand the robot's beliefs and adjust control accordingly. The robot modulates communication strength through confidence-aware adaptive authority allocation by providing assertive legible assistive actions when confident while increasing user authority when uncertain, transforming shared autonomy into transparent bidirectional collaboration. User studies including simulation, and physical experiments with a six-degree-of-freedom robot arm demonstrate that legible shared autonomy significantly improves users' understanding of robot beliefs and reduces user control effort compared to standard shared autonomy.
Jinwei Liu, Pengfei Li, Shaofeng Chen +2
May 14, 2026cs.RO
Robot imitation data are often multimodal: similar visual-language observations may be followed by different action chunks because human demonstrators act with different short-horizon intents, task phases, or recent context. Existing frame-conditioned VLA policies infer each chunk from the current observation and instruction alone, so under partial observability they may resample different intents across adjacent replanning steps, leading to inter-chunk conflict and unstable execution. We introduce IntentVLA, a history-conditioned VLA framework that encodes recent visual observations into a compact short-horizon intent representation and uses it to condition chunk generation. We further introduce AliasBench, a 12-task ambiguity-aware benchmark on RoboTwin2 with matched training data and evaluation environments that isolate short-horizon observation aliasing. Across AliasBench, SimplerEnv, LIBERO, and RoboCasa, IntentVLA improves rollout stability and outperforms strong VLA baselines
Shijie Lian, Bin Yu, Xiaopeng Lin +8