MAC-RRG: Iterative Multi-Agent Collaboration for X-ray Radiology Report Generation

Radiology report generation (RRG) has attracted significant attention due to its potential to reduce the workload of radiologists. The performance of current RRG approaches remains unsatisfactory against clinical standards. This paper introduces a novel RRG method, MLLM-RRG, that integrates multimodal large language models (MLLMs) with various types of clinical knowledge to generate accurate and comprehensive chest X-ray reports. Our method first designs a referring anatomical feature extractor that leverages anatomical knowledge to analyze different regions of the chest X-ray image and extract visual features without explicitly detecting regions. Next, based on the MLLM's decoder, we develop a multimodal report generator that leverages multimodal prompts constructed from dedicated visual features and textual instructions to produce the radiology report in an auto-regressive way. Finally, we introduce a disease-oriented clinical classification and alignment scheme in a multi-task learning manner to leverage disease knowledge to better preserve the clinical relevance among the generated reports. Once the model is trained, we also introduce a novel clinical quality reinforcement learning strategy to enhance the MLLM with report knowledge, further refining the tones of the generated reports towards radiologists. Extensive experiments on the MIMIC-CXR and IU X-Ray datasets demonstrate the superiority of our method over the state of the art. Our codes will be available at https://github.com/viscom-tongji/MLLM-RRG.

Automated radiology report generation (RRG) can ease radiologist workload, yet most existing systems produce a report in a single forward pass, with no mechanism to check a claim against the image or revisit a finding once stated. We present CogRad, a cognitively inspired multi-agent framework that structures generation around four stages of a radiologist's reading process. A Scout agent discovers anatomical regions directly from image patches via slot attention and assigns region and disease-level triage scores; an Investigator agent concentrates representational capacity on the regions Scout flags as suspicious; a Writer agent compiles these signals into a disease gated visual prefix for a large language model; and a Verifier agent supervises training with a visual entailment loss and, at inference, re-examines its own draft sentence by sentence, regenerating any report it judges insufficiently grounded. On CheXpert Plus, CogRad attains a BLEU-4 of 0.316 and a CIDEr of 0.322, the best scores among the methods we compare against. On IU X-Ray, it attains a BLEU-4 of 0.201 and a CIDEr of 0.724, leading every baseline on every standard NLG metric. We further evaluate CogRad with RadGraph F1, CheXbert F1, and a hallucination analysis to assess clinical accuracy beyond standard text-overlap metrics, complemented by ablation studies and Grad-CAM-based visualizations that characterize each agent's contribution and the model's visual grounding.

Purpose: Automatic radiology report generation (RRG) has been widely explored to improve reporting accuracy and reduce radiologists' workload. Most existing methods rely on autoregressive (AR) frameworks that generate reports token by token and cannot revise earlier content, making them prone to error propagation and inconsistent with the iterative refinement process of radiological reporting. In contrast, discrete diffusion large language models (DLLMs) generate text through iterative denoising, naturally enabling report refinement. However, DLLMs have not been extensively investigated for RRG. In this study, we developed and evaluated a discrete diffusion framework for RRG that enables iterative refinement rather than conventional left-to-right autoregressive decoding. Materials and methods: We developed DRRG, a DLLM-based framework that formulates RRG as iterative masked-token denoising. DRRG incorporates a clinical-entities-aware complementary mask to improve token supervision coverage and emphasize clinically important entities, together with a concept-conditioning module that injects image-derived clinical concepts into visual representations. DRRG was trained and evaluated on MIMIC-CXR and CheXpert Plus. Results: On MIMIC-CXR, DRRG achieved BLEU-4 of 0.210, CheXpert-F1 of 0.549, RadGraph-F1 of 0.281, GREEN of 0.360, and RaTEScore of 0.604, outperforming the compared methods on most reported metrics, despite employing a substantially smaller LLM decoder. On CheXpert Plus, DRRG achieved the highest BLEU-4 (0.119) and CheXpert-F1 (0.347) among the compared methods. Conclusion: Discrete diffusion provides an effective alternative to autoregressive radiology report generation by enabling iterative, bidirectional report refinement. Incorporating clinically focused masking and image-derived concept conditioning improves report quality and clinical consistency.