ZO-COSMO: Index-Free One-Hop Mixing for Decentralized Zeroth-Order Optimization

Zeroth-Order (ZO) optimization is pivotal for scenarios where backpropagation is unavailable, such as memory-constrained on-device learning and black-box optimization. However, existing methods face a stark trade-off: they are either sample-inefficient (e.g., standard finite differences) or suffer from high variance due to randomized estimation (e.g., random subspace methods). In this work, we propose Coherent Coordinate Descent (CoCD), a deterministic, sample-efficient, and budget-aware ZO optimizer. Theoretically, we formalize the notion of gradient coherence and demonstrate that CoCD is equivalent to Block Cyclic Coordinate Descent (BCCD) with ``warm starts,'' effectively converting historical (stale) gradients from a liability into a computational asset. This mechanism enables $O(1)$ query complexity per step while maintaining global descent directions. Furthermore, we derive error bounds revealing a counter-intuitive insight: larger finite-difference step sizes can induce an implicit smoothing effect on the optimization landscape by reducing the effective smoothness constant, thereby improving convergence stability. Experiments on MLP, CNN, and ResNet architectures (up to 270k parameters) demonstrate that CoCD significantly outperforms BCCD in terms of sample efficiency and convergence loss/accuracy, and exhibits superior stability over randomized ZO methods. Our results suggest that deterministic, structure-aware updates offer a superior alternative to randomization for lightweight ZO optimization.

Low-bit forward evaluation is an attractive route to memory-efficient zeroth-order (ZO) adaptation: the optimizer needs only scalar losses, and the model can be queried near deployment precision. The obstacle is that a quantized ZO query is not a continuous finite difference followed by harmless storage rounding. The query chooses endpoints, the low-precision engine rounds them, and the loss difference is measured along the rounded chord. For nonuniform companding quantizers, this makes the codebook insufficient to predict ZO behavior: a fixed weight-space radius can collapse in dense cells, over-span sparse cells, or assign a rounded chord to an unrounded update direction. We identify the missing object as query geometry and model scalar nonuniform quantization as $Q = φ^{-1} \circ U \circ φ$. CAQ-ZO (Compander-Aligned Queries for Zeroth-Order Optimization) forms one-grid-step Rademacher stencils $z \pm Δr$ in $z = φ(x)$, maps endpoints back through $φ^{-1}$, and updates in $z$. Our theory proves the grid-span mismatch, decomposes endpoint-rounding estimator residuals, and gives stationarity bounds in which generic off-grid queries retain a $Δ^2/μ^2$ residual channel while CAQ-ZO makes the query-time residual exactly zero. Synthetic experiments isolate this channel, and matched NF4 Qwen/Llama fine-tuning shows that CAQ-ZO improves the trained NF4 baseline under the same quantizer and evaluation budget.

Zeroth-order (ZO) optimization, learning from finite differences of function evaluations without backpropagation, has recently regained attention in deep learning due to its memory efficiency and applicability to gray- or black-box pipelines. Yet, ZO methods are often dismissed as fundamentally unscalable because of estimator variance and unfavorable query complexity. We argue that this conclusion might be misguided: ZO optimization is underexplored, not underpowered. We show that many perceived limitations stem from myopic development practices, most notably full-space, element-wise, estimator-centric designs. We articulate six positions spanning the algorithmic, systems, and evaluation stack. First, we revisit the feasibility boundaries of estimator-centric ZO methods through variance control, variance-query tradeoffs, and directional-derivative lenses. Then, we identify three underexplored opportunities: (i) subspace and spectral views of ZO that enable interpretable variance reduction with graceful query scaling, (ii) the forward-only nature of ZO as a systems advantage for communication-efficient, pipeline-friendly, and resource-constrained training, and (iii) the need to de-obfuscate ZO evaluations from task complexity. We strongly advocate rethinking ZO optimization around its unique strengths and acting accordingly, opening a viable path toward large-scale, system-aware, and resource-efficient learning with ZO optimization.